Wednesday, September 11, 2024

Loose Ends

And quiet is the thought of you

The file on you complete

Except what we forgot to do

A thousand kisses deep



Wednesday, March 13, 2024

In a Lonely Place (1950, dir. Nicholas Ray)

‘I was born when she kissed me.

I died when she left .

I lived a few weeks while she loved me.’



Wednesday, October 18, 2023

Waiting Around to Die

A Great Run and a Fascinating Ending. 

Mission accomplished. 



We, The Drowned

. . . The Lost and sometimes Found, for a few precious moments.



Friday, June 9, 2023

A glimpse into perfection

You have to die a few times before starting to live



Tuesday, April 4, 2023

Presque Vu

The subtle gravity of levitation



Tuesday, September 20, 2022

Nirvana

Not much chance, completely cut loose from purpose, he was a young man riding a bus through North Carolina on the way to somewhere and it began to snow and the bus stopped at a little café in the hills and the passengers entered. He sat at the counter with the others, he ordered and the food arrived. The meal was particularly good and the coffee. The waitress was unlike the women he had known. She was unaffected, there was a natural humour which came from her. The fry cook said crazy things. The dishwasher in back, laughed, a good clean pleasant laugh. The young man watched the snow through the windows. He wanted to stay in that café forever. The curious feeling swam through him that everything was beautiful there, that it would always stay beautiful there. Then the bus driver told the passengers that it was time to board. The young man thought, I'll just stay here, I'll just stay here. But then he rose and followed the others onto the bus. He found his seat and looked at the café through the bus window. Then the bus moved off, down a curve, downward, out of the hills. The young man looked straight forward. He heard the other passengers speaking of other things, or they were reading or trying to sleep. They had not noticed the magic. The young man put his head to one side, closed his eyes, pretended to sleep. There was nothing else to do. Just to listen to the sound of the engine, the sound of the tires in the snow.







Friday, August 12, 2022

Redemption

It wasn't just about sex.
It was about redemption.
The best sex usually is.
You don't just want to empty your glands; you want to fill your heart, or share part of it with someone else.
She was going to raise this dumb guy up to a higher level.
And sex and affection was only one rung.
-- Marlon Brando with Eva Marie Saint in "On the Waterfront"



Wednesday, June 22, 2022

Beginnings

I don't really care about happy endings.
Endings are the saddest part,
So just give me a happy middle,
And a very happy start.



Monday, June 13, 2022

Ghost Hunters

We pine for the things that might have been, 
the words that were never said, 
and the love that remains elusive.



Saturday, June 4, 2022

Girl in Blue

 'When I know your soul, I will paint your eyes'

― Amedeo Modigliani



Thursday, May 26, 2022

It will set you free for a price

People love simple and preposterous lies. 

They much prefer them to the truth. Truth is elusive. Difficult to discover. Infinitely nuanced. Hard to hold onto.

Each tiny bit of truth comes at a high price: A love lost. A marriage ruined. A business bankrupt. Money wasted. And a sorry soul burning on some ash pit in Hell. Nor does truth make you feel good. Like a magnifying mirror, it shows blemishes. You squirm in your seat when you see it. Often, you want to turn off the lights.

Not so with myth. It comes right over to you, fawns over you, airbrushes your photo, and botoxes your face. It flatters you with weak light and strong angles. It pretends you are the noble master and it is merely the humble slave… willing to do your bidding.


Monday, May 23, 2022

Wednesday, April 20, 2022

Serial Killers

 What doesn't kill you makes you something



Friday, April 15, 2022

Easier said than done

 A few things about ditching



Tuesday, April 12, 2022

Public domain

Pick your poison privately





Saturday, February 19, 2022

Not bad.

 “Life can’t be all bad when for ten dollars you can buy all the Beethoven sonatas and listen to them for ten years."

                                                     -William F. Buckley Jr.,


Wednesday, February 9, 2022

Time is just a simple function of gravity

Plus a few ever changing constants



Saturday, January 1, 2022

Friday, November 12, 2021

Just be yourself

It' s very simple to be yourself,
but quite difficult to be simple.


                               

Friday, October 1, 2021

Sunday, March 28, 2021

Leap in Void

 You never realize the holes they left until you fall into them.



Tuesday, February 9, 2021

Friday, January 1, 2021

Take a break

If it’s not broken, don’t fix it. 
Even if it is broken, leave it alone, you’ll probably make it worse.





Friday, August 28, 2020

All you need is love

Perhaps not love itself but the knowledge that love is there. 
Like new batteries in the flashlight in the emergency kit in the hall closet



Saturday, March 28, 2020

Reservations

You still hold a special place in my heart. 
I keep this special place just for you, like a ‘Reserved’ sign on a quiet corner table in a restaurant.



Sunday, March 1, 2020

Tiny Beautiful Things Gone

 “The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it’s profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater.”

- Frank Zappa


Sunday, February 9, 2020

Learning how to fly

  I was advised that to make her fall in love, I had to make her laugh. 
  But every time she laughs, I’m the one who falls in love. 



Wednesday, January 1, 2020

Days of future past

The days came along one after another, 
and then four months were gone, 
and everything was gone, 
and I was gone.



Monday, November 4, 2019

2Little2Late

 Nothing is better than something



Sunday, September 1, 2019

Turning the lights off

Either we forget right away or we never forget.



Thursday, August 29, 2019

Lullabies for Little Criminals

A bullet must have passed through your heart when you were very young, causing you to bleed out slowly, over things and lovers and every white surface that you had ever come across.




Thursday, August 15, 2019

Everything you want in life has teeth

Few people can tell the difference between denial and what used to be known as hope.




Friday, July 26, 2019

Serial Killers

Most wanted serial killer of the last century.




Wednesday, July 24, 2019

It’s a mystery how some people just feel like home.

The amazing thing is that even after we've fallen, we'd still get in line to do it again.

Tuesday, July 2, 2019

Stranger in a Strange Land

The way to love someone is to lightly run your finger over that person’s soul until you find a crack, and then gently pour your love into that crack.



Friday, June 28, 2019

The things that matter don’t necessarily make sense

Fate is like a strange, unpopular restaurant filled with odd little waiters who bring you things you never asked for and don’t always like, but you fall for them anyway.



Saturday, February 9, 2019

What I like best

Like is what happens between Love and Hate. 
Like is for strangers



Tuesday, January 1, 2019

Looking forward for the next miracle

 Old things are better than new things, because they've got stories in them



Wednesday, August 1, 2018

Things to do today

“I've suffered loss in my career for not being obedient.

Believe me, the loss was little compared to the fear all of you stomach every day.
When the sun sets, I can sing ‘My Way’ with Elvis, Frank Sinatra, and Francis Coppola.
What is your anthem?”
- john milius




Friday, February 9, 2018

Taking a stroll

 We’re all just walking each other home.

Monday, January 1, 2018

Thursday, February 9, 2017

Things we love to hate or love

We lose ourselves in things we love. 
We find ourselves there, too.


Sunday, January 1, 2017

Queen of lilac, queen of blue

People are not of symmetrical importance in each others memories.




Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Options

 The past is never dead. It’s not even past



Friday, January 1, 2016

A few tips about 2016

You've got to know when to hold 'em
Know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away
And know when to run 
You never count your money 
When you're sittin' at the table 
There'll be time enough for countin' 
When the dealin's done.



Monday, February 9, 2015

Sailing along for the ride

 It’s never fifty-fifty. It’s always seventy-thirty, or sixty-forty.



Monday, January 26, 2015

Forward into the past

Meanwhile at a small Balkan country 

Saturday, January 24, 2015

This time is different

A short comment on Greek elections

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Still looking for an avalanche

Like any dealer he was watching for the card

That is so high and wild

He'll never need to deal another



One of these days


What was the last time you did something for the first time ?



Monday, July 7, 2014

CENSORSHIP IS BEING OUTSOURCED TO THE MOB

Two recent cases Down Under show how dangerous Twittermobs can be.
By BRENDAN O’NEILL
One of the curious things about the twenty-first-century West is that it feels deeply censorious even though, historically speaking, there isn’t a huge amount of state censorship. Yes, many Western societies have anti-‘hate speech’ laws, debate-choking defamation statutes, and a host of methods for regulating the raucous press, all of which limit how daring or just downright offensive we can be. But we don’t exactly live under nightmarish Orwellian regimes that pass laws explicitly designed to silence political opinions, or to punish anti-Christ iconoclasm, or to criminalise people found in possession of indecent novels or art. How do we explain the existence of an almost unprecedented culture of censoriousness in the absence of too much old-style state censorship?
It’s because censorship has been outsourced to the mob. Censorship is alive and well; it’s just that today it is enforced, not so much by brute law and the copper’s boot, but by mobs of self-styled guardians of acceptable thought.
The illiberal job that was once done by the state and its offshoots - the policing of thought and the punishment of outré speech - is now increasingly done by informal intolerant networks. Outsourcing has been all the rage among Western states in recent years. They’ve outsourced responsibility for aspects of policing, for the guarding of prisoners, even for the fighting of wars, as we saw with the use of mercenary outfits in the West’s conquering of Iraq. Now, the moral authority to decree what can and can’t be uttered in the public sphere has been outsourced, too, passed from the government to moral lynch mobs, noisy cliques of non-state censors. The relatively small amount of explicit state censorship today shouldn’t be taken as a sign that we live in a more free society, but rather speaks to something quite terrifying - that the state doesn’t really need to enact laws that police our words at a time when there are so many mobs willing to do that dirty work on its behalf.
In Australia over the past week, there have been two striking examples of outsourced censoriousness, which reveal how this new phenomenon works and how damaging it can be.
In the first case, a Georgian opera singer, Tamar Iveri, was hounded out of Opera Australia (OA) after it was revealed she once made homophobic comments on her Facebook page. Ms Iveri had been due to perform in OA’s production of Otello, which opens in Sydney next month. But then someone exposed that, a year ago, she had said on FB that she was glad Georgian protesters had spat on Gay Pride marchers in Tbilisi, and had asked the Georgian president not to let into Georgia what she called the ‘West’s faecal masses’ - that is, homosexuals. Oz’s left-leaners, small-L liberals and artsworld inhabitants decided that such a person was not fit to perform in Australia, and so they used their considerable influence - their newspaper columns, their social-networking pages, the financial leverage of their patronage of the arts, which they made clear could be withdrawn - to put pressure on OA to drop Ms Iveri. They won. Ms Iveri was cast out, dumped by OA on the basis that her views were ‘unconscionable’. And thus was Australian opera made morally pure once more.

Sunday, July 6, 2014

Incredible confusions, Part 2

Of interest and the dangerous habit of suppressing it
The idea that the charging of interest is unethical and should be banned has a long tradition in the history of human civilisation. It seems to have played a role at some point in all the major religions, certainly in Christianity, Judaism and Islam, and it is today promoted most strongly by advocates of Islamic banking.
As an economist I cannot (and should not) comment on matters of religion. Religion and economics deal with completely different aspects of human existence. Religion is about ‘ultimate ends’ and ‘personal values’. Economics does not deal with ends but with means. Economics does not tell anybody what his or her values should be. Contrary to what is frequently claimed – usually by those who do not understand economics – economics does not tell you that you should strive for more material goods and more services at your disposal.
But it so happens that we live in a world in which most people have personal aims or goals that involve having at least a certain material wealth, and in which most people prefer the possession of more material goods to less material goods; and the science of economics – for economics is a science, and in fact an objective, wertfreie (value-free) science – can then explain why people have a better chance of achieving these (material) aims if they use such social institutions as the division of labor, private property, trade, money, and many others. Additionally, the science of economics can show how these social institutions work, demonstrate the laws and regularities inherent in them, and can develop rules for their most appropriate use. Economics is purely about the means of social cooperation for the attainment of material goals. It never concerns itself with ultimate ends.
If most of the population became Buddhist monks tomorrow and would lose any interest in accumulating material wealth, would happily withdraw into monasteries and dedicate themselves to meditation, none of the principles and laws of economics would have suddenly become less true or invalid. The law of comparative advantage as articulated by David Ricardo would be as true on that day as on any other. The laws of economics would still apply just as the laws of gravity would. Of course, the interest in economic studies would probably diminish rapidly but that is all. Or, not quite all: Society would also be rapidly impoverished in material terms – even to the point of mass starvation –, and this the economist can ascertain with certainty, although nothing can be said about any compensating gains in spiritual wealth, of course.
If you believe that your God demands that if you lend money you should not charge interest, than there is nothing that I, as an economist, can say to you – other than, maybe, give me a call whenever you have some extra cash. The point at which I can – and should – comment is when you were to claim in addition that the observance of this rule would lead to a more stable and better functioning economy, that the non-charging of interest would not diminish society’s wealth but even increase it, or that the resulting economic structure would at least conform better to some generally accepted notion of fairness. Here we have reached a point where debate has become possible, not because I, as an economist, have intruded onto the religious ground of values and ultimate ends but because the advocate of religion has intruded onto the economists’ ground of the study of the laws for wealth creation.

Thursday, July 3, 2014

Incredible confusions Part 1

‘Positive Money’ and the fallacy of the need for a state money producer
By Detlev Schlichter
I am usually inclined to encourage the inquiry of the fundamental aspects of money and banking. This is because I tend to believe that only by going back to first principles is it possible to cut through the thicket of widely accepted but deeply flawed theories that dominate the current debate in mainstream media, politics and the financial industry. From my own experience in financial markets I can appreciate how convenient and tempting it is in a business context, where quick and easy communication is of the essence, to adopt a certain, widely shared set of paradigms, regardless of how flimsy their theoretical foundations. Fund managers, traders and financial journalists live in the immediate present, preoccupied as they are with what makes headlines today, and they work in intensely collaborative enterprises. They have neither the time nor inclination to question the body of theories – often no longer even perceived as ‘theories’ but considered accepted common wisdom – that shapes the way they view and talk about the outside world. Thus, erroneous concepts and even outright fallacies often remain unquestioned and, by virtue of constant repetition, live comfortably in the bloodstream of policy debates, economic analysis, and financial market reportage.
This goes a long way in explaining the undeserved survival of a number of persistent modern myths: deflation is the gravest economic danger we face; Japan has been crippled by deflation for years and would grow again if it only managed to create some inflation; lack of ‘aggregate demand’ explains recessions and must be countered with easy monetary policy; and money-printing, as long as it does not lead to higher inflation, is a free lunch, i.e. we can only expect good from it. None of these statements stand up to scrutiny. In fact, they are all utterly absurd. Yet, we can barely open a newspaper and not have this nonsense stare us in the face, if not quite as bluntly as stated above, than at least as the intellectual soil from which the analysis or commentary presented has sprung. Deep-rooted misconceptions can only be dismantled through dissection of their building blocs and a discussion of basic concepts.
The dangers of going back to basics
However, going back to basics and to first principles, analyzing critically the fundamental aspects of our financial system, is not free of danger. Here, too, lies a minefield of potentially grave intellectual error, and when things go wrong here, at the basic level, the results and policy recommendations derived from such analysis are bound to be nonsensical too, if not even more nonsensical than what the mainstream believes. In this and the following essays I am going to address some of the erroneous notions at the fundamental level of money and banking that seem to have gained currency in the public debate of late.
I get periodically confronted with these confusions through readers’ comments on my website. Some of the questions and suggestions expressed there reveal the same, or very similar, errors and misunderstandings, and these often seem to have their origin in other publications circulating elsewhere on the web. Among them are the following fallacies, in no particular order:
§  The idea that the charging of interest, or in particular the charging of interest on money, is a fundamental problem in our financial system.
§  The notion that there must be a systematic shortage of money in the economy because banks, through fractional-reserve banking, bring into circulation only amounts of money equivalent to the principal of the loans they create but not the necessary amount to pay the interest on these loans.
§  The notion that it is a problem that money-creation is tied to debt-creation (again, as a consequence of fractional-reserve banking) and that it would be possible and advantageous to have the state issue money directly (debt-free) rather than have the banks do it.
§  The idea that schemes are feasible that allow the painless shrinkage or even disappearance of the national debt.
 All these ideas are nonsensical, based on bad economics and fundamental logical flaws, and to the extent that they entail policy proposals, these policies, if enacted, would not only not give us a stable and more prosperous economy but would surely lead to new instabilities or even outright chaos.
None of these misconceptions originate, or even resonate, as far as I can tell, with the ‘mainstream’. The mainstream– the financial market professionals, the central bankers, financial regulators, and the media – remain resolutely uninterested in dealing with fundamental questions of money and banking for the reasons given above. Here, the discussion continues to centre on how the economy can be ‘stimulated’ more, what ‘unconventional’ policies the central banks may still have up their sleeves, and if the central banks need new targets or better central bankers. Icebergs or no icebergs, these deckchairs need re-arranging.
Read more at :

Monday, June 30, 2014

The Great War And Its Terrible Aftermath

Sarajevo Is The Fulcrum Of Modern History
By David Stockman
One hundred years ago today the world was shook loose of its moorings. Every school boy knows that the assassination of the archduke of Austria at Sarajevo was the trigger that incited the bloody, destructive conflagration of the world’s nations known as the Great War. But this senseless eruption of unprecedented industrial state violence did not end with the armistice four years later.
In fact, 1914 is the fulcrum of modern history. It is the year the Fed opened-up for business just as the carnage in northern France closed-down the prior magnificent half-century era of liberal internationalism and honest gold-backed money. So it was the Great War’s terrible aftermath—–a century of drift toward statism, militarism and fiat money—-that was actually triggered by the events at Sarajevo.
Unfortunately, modern historiography wants to keep the Great War sequestered in a four-year span of archival curiosities about battles, mustard gas and monuments to the fallen. But the opposite historiography is more nearly the truth. The assassins at Sarajevo triggered the very warp and woof of the hundred years which followed.
The Great War was self-evidently an epochal calamity, especially for the 20 million combatants and civilians who perished for no reason that is discernible in any fair reading of history, or even unfair one. Yet the far greater calamity is that  Europe’s senseless fratricide of 1914-1918 gave birth to all the great evils of the 20th century— the Great Depression, totalitarian genocides, Keynesian economics,  permanent  warfare states, rampaging central banks and the exceptionalist-rooted follies of America’s global imperialism.
Indeed, in Old Testament fashion, one begat the next and the next and still the next. This chain of calamity originated in the Great War’s destruction of sound money, that is, in the post-war demise of the pound sterling which previously had not experienced a peacetime change in its gold content for nearly two hundred years.
Not unreasonably, the world’s financial system had become anchored on the London money markets where the other currencies traded at fixed exchange rates to the rock steady pound sterling—which, in turn, meant that prices and wages throughout Europe were expressed in common money and tended toward transparency and equilibrium.
This liberal international economic order—that is, honest money, relatively free trade, rising international capital flows and rapidly growing global economic integration—-resulted in  a 40-year span between 1870 and 1914 of rising living standards, stable prices, massive capital investment and prolific  technological progress that was never equaled—either before or since.
During intervals of war, of course, 19th century governments had usually suspended gold convertibility and open trade in the heat of combat.  But when the cannons fell silent, they had also endured the trauma of post-war depression until wartime debts had been liquidated and inflationary currency expedients had been wrung out of the circulation. This was called “resumption” and restoring convertibility at the peacetime parities was the great challenge of post-war normalizations.
The Great War, however, involved a scale of total industrial mobilization and financial mayhem that was unlike any that had gone before.  In the case of Great Britain, for example, its national debt increased 14-fold, its price level doubled, its capital stock was depleted, most off-shore investments were liquidated and universal wartime conscription left it with a massive overhang of human and financial liabilities.
Yet England was the least devastated. In France, the price level inflated by 300 percent, its extensive Russian investments were confiscated by the Bolsheviks and its debts in New York and London catapulted to more than 100 percent of GDP.
Among the defeated powers, currencies emerged nearly worthless with the German mark at five cents on the pre-war dollar, while wartime debts—especially after the Carthaginian peace of Versailles—–soared to crushing, unrepayable heights.
In short, the bow-wave of debt, currency inflation and financial disorder from the Great War was so immense and unprecedented that the classical project of post-war liquidation and “resumption” of convertibility was destined to fail.  In fact, the 1920s were a grinding, sometimes inspired but eventually failed struggle to resume the international gold standard, fixed parities, open world trade and unrestricted international capital flows.
Only in the final demise of these efforts after 1929 did the Great Depression, which had been lurking all along in the post-war shadows, come bounding onto the stage of history.
Read more at : http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/sarajevo-is-the-fulcrum-of-modern-history-the-great-war-and-its-terrible-aftermath/


Wednesday, June 25, 2014

This time is really, but really, different

These Fake Rallies Will End in Tears
By Detlev S Schlichter
Investors and speculators face some profound challenges today: How to deal with politicized markets, continuously “guided” by central bankers and regulators? To what extent do prices reflect support from policy, in particular super-easy monetary policy, and to what extent other, ‘fundamental’ factors? And how is all this market manipulation going to play out in the long run?
It is obvious that most markets would not be trading where they are trading today were it not for the longstanding combination of ultra-low policy rates and various programs of ‘quantitative easing’ around the world, some presently diminishing (US), others potentially increasing (Japan, eurozone). As major U.S. equity indices closed last week at another record high and overall market volatility remains low, some observers may say that the central banks have won. Their interventions have now established a nirvana in which asset markets seem to rise almost continuously but calmly, with carefully contained volatility and with their downside apparently fully insured by central bankers who are ready to ease again at any moment. Those who believe in Schumpeter’s model of “bureaucratic socialism”, a system that he expected ultimately to replace capitalism altogether, may rejoice: Increasingly the capitalist “jungle” gets replaced with a well-ordered, centrally managed system guided by the enlightened bureaucracy. Reading the minds of Yellen, Kuroda, Draghi and Carney is now the number one game in town. Investors, traders and economists seem to care about little else.
“The problem is that we’re not there [in a low volatility environment] because markets have decided this, but because central banks have told us…” Sir Michael Hintze, founder of hedge fund CQS, observed in conversation with the Financial Times (FT, June 14/15 2014) [1]. “The beauty of capital markets is that they are voting systems, people vote every day with their wallets. Now voting is finished. We’re being told what to do by central bankers – and you lose money if you don’t follow their lead.”