By Andrew G. Biggs
The size of government is
of particular interest these days, with many Americans believing that rising
government spending is crowding out the ability of individuals and businesses
to control their own well-being and improve the economy. Indeed, Gallup reported last
week that, on average, Americans think the federal government wastes 50 cents
of each dollar it spends.
But how much does the
federal government really spend?
On paper, the
Congressional Budget Office reports that
in 2010, the federal government spent $3.456 trillion, an amount that is equal
to 23.8 percent of gross domestic product. That’s one-quarter higher than the
historical norm of around 19 percent of GDP.
But direct spending isn’t
the only spending Washington does. As Lori Montgomery reports in
the Washington Post, last year the federal government spent an additional $1.08
trillion on tax expenditures, which are tax breaks that for all intents and
purposes are spending.
From the mortgage
interest deduction to employer-provided health coverage to credits for
purchasing corporate jets, these tax expenditures reduce individual and
corporate taxes only if the individuals and corporations do what the government
would like them to do. Rent a house? No tax break. Buy your own health
insurance rather than have your employer provide it? Same story. Buy a
corporate boat rather than jet? Nope, no tax cut for you.
That $1.08 trillion in
tax expenditures is 24 percent of all federal spending, and is all off the
books, allowing a much bigger government than official statistics tell—and much
bigger than people might be willing to tolerate if they knew.
Tax expenditures, as Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan said, are “boob bait for the bubbas,” with the bubbas being conservative Republicans who will support anything that calls itself a tax cut even if it walks, talks, and quacks like government spending.
Tax expenditures, as Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan said, are “boob bait for the bubbas,” with the bubbas being conservative Republicans who will support anything that calls itself a tax cut even if it walks, talks, and quacks like government spending.
Put it all together and
the federal government spends an amount equal to 31.2 percent of GDP—that is,
almost one-third of everything produced in the economy.
Moreover, according to the
Congressional Research Service, tax expenditures have grown by about 24 percent
relative to the size of the economy since 1974, from 5.8 percent of GDP to 7.2
percent. So not only do tax expenditures add to overall government spending,
they’re adding more today than they did 37 years ago.
On top of this you have
the cost of government regulations, which also amount to de facto federal
spending because they impose costs on businesses which are used to further
policy goals. A recent report from
the Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy finds that the total
cost of federal regulations was $1.175 trillion, equal to over $8,000 per
employee or 8.1 percent of gross domestic product.
Add regulations to the
mix and the total sway of the federal government over the private sector equals
roughly 39 percent of the economy, a larger portion than in prior decades. And,
as the baby boom generation retires and entitlement costs skyrocket, the
federal share of GDP will rise even further.
We can argue regarding
the costs and benefits of larger government; but we should not argue that
larger government is in fact what we have today.
No comments:
Post a Comment