How to Be Removed from Polite
Company
by wintercow20
I am extremely saddened by the
passing of Steve Jobs, as seems to be most people I know. I think half the
tweets and facebook statuses I follow are making some reference to what Steve
Jobs meant to them in terms of his inspirational qualities and of course the wonders
of the products he delivered. I agree. The world is a poorer place without him
in it. I can only hope that he inspires millions of others to take risks,
understand what his fellow man wants, and to be amiable through it all (or so
he appeared to be).
Now, here’s how to get oneself
banned from polite company – use the occasion of someone’s death to score
points.
But reflect for a moment on Steve
Jobs. He took resources from no one. He coerced no one. He pandered to no one.
He made hundreds of millions of people happy. He ended up being responsible for
the creation of tens if not hundreds of thousands of jobs, and inspired
countless others to mimic him, or to beat him, or to otherwise complement his
work. He asked for no special favors. He was adopted, and certainly was not
dealt the best hand in the lottery of life. He blamed no one else for his
failures. He shared in his successes. I would argue that this one man’s short
life was far more important than a century’s worth of politicians who claim to be
working in your interest.
Sure, tears are shed at the passing
of “great” political leaders, and indeed some leaders have done a fine job of
representing their constituents. But even the best political leaders are best
at laying the foundations and groundwork so that remarkable people like Steve
Jobs can flourish. That does not mean the work of good political leaders is
unimportant – of course not — a cursory look across the planet to some
dysfunctional countries confirms that. But it does mean that the general scorn
applied to the entrepreneurs who have done so much to help us become healthy,
wealthy and wise is disproportionately large given the scorn applied to a
political class whose exclusive tool is to employ coercion (which again, is
perhaps necessary, if unfortunate). Why are we able to appreciate the life of a
Steve Jobs and to ignore the millions of others doing the same thing? And why
is the default view of the political class more like the way Jobs himself is
being treated today? Contrast what Jobs has done for the world with what Ted
Kennedy did for the world. The reaction to Senator Kennedy’s death reminded me
a bit of the reaction we are seeing today. Am I crazy for hearing these two
reactions as discordant when played together?
No comments:
Post a Comment