Germany’s
Collective Self-Debasement
by
Paul Gottfried
German
historian Wolfgang Schivelbusch published a far-ranging 2003 study on the
culture of defeated nations that focuses on three cases: the American South
after the Civil War, the French after their defeat in the Franco-Prussian War
in 1871, and Germany after WWI. According to Schivelbusch, defeated nations
(Verlierernationen) as typified by the three cases he investigates stress myths
that mitigate their defeat and create a favorable view of those who fought for
their “lost cause.” Before its recent conversion to PC, the American South was
paradigmatic for the way nations handle defeat, and there is little to be found
in Germans’ attitudes after 1918 that does not mirror how the South saw itself
after 1865.
Defeated
powers, according to Schivelbusch, insist they were overwhelmed rather than
really defeated, and they tend to pin the blame on their triumphant enemy’s
unfair advantage or dishonorable tactics or on some internal foe who betrayed
their side. The German legend of being knifed in the back in 1918 has its
counterpart in the French view of the treacherous, cowardly government of Louis
Napoleon that tricked them into war and then sued for peace against the
Prussians; or the perfidy of General Longstreet, who supposedly showed his
defeatist attitudes by joining the Reconstruction government after the Late
Unpleasantness.
The
only significant exception to the “culture of defeat” that Schivelbusch
describes is his own country after 1945. In the introduction he suggests that
the enormity and extravagance of the German exception may have driven him into
writing his study. Unlike other societies he analyzes, including the Germans
after WWI, contemporary Germans seem to luxuriate in “collective self-debasement.”
Germans not only claim no honor for their soldiers in WWII but glorify their
enemies who inflicted fire-bombing on their hapless civilians, or in the Soviet
case, cut a swath across Central Europe murdering and raping. This ethic of
self-rejection has gone so far that German historians and journalists delight
in accepting blame for their wretched country in earlier European conflicts,
and they typically view all of German history before 1933 as a lead-in to the
Third Reich.
Such
a mindset is evident in how German politicians present the decision to save the
Greeks from their self-inflicted bankruptcy. Serious arguments could be cited
for Angela Merkel and her Christian Democratic government’s decision to help
out the profligate Greeks; for example, German creditors’ entanglement in the
Greek debacle, Germany’s centrality as the EU’s economic force, and the German
economy’s present dependence on the euro. Nonetheless, German politicians and
intellectuals have appealed to the image of Germany as a moral leper in order
to justify further loans to Greece and other “scapegrace” EU members. A leading
German economic historian and a direct descendant of Germany’s renowned
nineteenth-century classicist and theologian Albrecht Ritschl has insisted that
such payments be viewed as the reparation debts that Germans never fully paid
for starting WWI. Ritschl is upset that his countrymen were never sufficiently
fined for the Great War’s horrendous crime, which has turned them “into the
greatest debtor nation in world history.” Paying off the Greeks should be only
a modest beginning in compensating the world for the sins of Kaiser Bill.
Other
politicians, such as Gregor Gysi of the Party of Democratic Socialists (read:
retread communists) and the chancellor (who represents something that
substitutes for Germany’s center-right), argue that if the Greeks do not
receive German economic aid, all hell might break loose. The EU could be
endangered, with Germany thereafter propelled toward a national resurgence that
could threaten peace in Europe. The Krauts, it seems, aren’t quite ready for
political prime time. All the wars they’ve unleashed (supposedly with zero help
from the other side) show that they have to be imprisoned in some international
structure lest they feel tempted to act out. From reading such descriptions,
one gets the impression that the EU must be kept intact as a loony bin for a
psychotic country.
Perhaps
the most comical argument for bailing out Greece has come from Merkel’s CDU
Labor Minister and outspoken feminist Ursula von der Leyen, who has been vocal
in her support for “helping the Greeks get back on their feet.” In a recent
appearance on a weekend talk show hosted by TV celebrity Günther Jauch, Ms. von
der Leyen went after those who criticize Greece’s spending habits and bloated
state bureaucracy. According to van der Leyen, such a captious judgment does
not take into account the close resemblance between the “Greeks at the present
hour and the Germans in 1945, when we were a battered people.” To the Labor
Minister, assisting the Greeks seems the proper thing to do. It is “like the
CARE-packages that the Americans sent us after the War.”
This
last comparison borders on the lunatic, except when a German politician is
trying to be “nice.” Then it simply reflects the dominant national culture.
Perhaps the Germans should insist on a fundamental right which the Americans
once exercised: to carpet with bombs an enemy country and then hang its leaders
as war criminals. Once having done this, the Germans could get on with the good
stuff, such as providing those they’ve mercilessly “battered” with chocolate
bars and sewing kits. Like other German politicians, von der Leyen is
accustomed to the double kowtow (der doppelte Kotau), which involves
simultaneously sucking up to the Yankees and non-German Europeans. Whereas
Germans were once feared for lunging at their neighbors’ necks, now they’re
delighted to be at everyone’s feet.
Presumably
the banks, which made loans to the Greeks at the German government’s urging, will
have to be saved as a first step to dealing with Greek insolvency. An article
in the relatively right-wing Preußische Allgemeine Zeitung explains a
ridiculous situation: The Germans have the same representation in the EU
Council as Cyprus and Malta combined, yet they contribute 28% of the
organization’s available capital as opposed to the 0.3% given by Cyprus and
Malta. Germans are watching their earnings decline while paying for other
countries’ insolvency, yet they seem determined to make their problem even
worse. Although Germans gripe about the bailout, the vast majority support
leftist parties that will give away even more of their money to foreign
governments. German voters snub and even despise parties such as the
Republikaner which oppose the bailouts.
The
Republikaner, who have been critical of Muslim immigration and bailouts and
whose members favor a freer market economy, had been under the surveillance of
the Verfassungsschutz, a German agency set up to monitor “extremist” parties
thought to threaten the German constitutional order. The surveillance soon
ended because there is nothing about the party that could possibly threaten the
German constitution. The major “democratic” parties, including the former
communist party, had a hand in influencing the decision to investigate their
opponents’ “extremism,” and the cloud under which they arranged to place the
Republikaner with the partisan Verfassungsschutz worked well. Their incipient
opposition received no more than 0.4 percent of the votes cast in the 2009
general elections. By contrast, the antinational, antifascist, socialist bloc
is expected to run the next German government.
Given
the systematically instilled distrust of themselves and their history, one must
assume that German voters will follow their antifascist chancellor, who in the
face of collapsing EU economies has called for a “far more unified Europe.”
Merkel hopes to strengthen the EU prison house created for her country of
would-be juvenile delinquents.
No comments:
Post a Comment