SAINT GEORGE AND THE
FLAGGIN'
By Mark Steyn
When it's not
explicitly hostile, Western liberals' attitude to Ayaan Hirsi Ali is deeply
condescending. One thinks of Nicholas Kristof in the New York Times, pondering the
author's estrangement from her Somali relatives:
I couldn't help thinking that perhaps Hirsi Ali's family is dysfunctional simply because its members never learned to bite their tongues and just say to one another: "I love you."
In Somalia, they don't bite their tongues but they do
puncture your clitoris. Miss Hirsi Ali was the victim of what Western hospitals
already abbreviate to "FGM" ("female genital mutilation")
or, ever more fashionably, "FGC" (the less judgmental "female
genital cutting"). Group hugs may work at the Times op-ed desk when the Pulitzer
nominations fail to materialize, but Mr. Kristof is perhaps being a wee bit
Upperwestsideocentric to assume their universality. Miss Hirsi Ali has been on
the receiving end of both Islam and the squishy multiculti accommodation
thereof. For seven years, she has been accompanied by bodyguards, because the
men who killed the film director Theo van Gogh would also like to kill her.
She was speaking in Calgary the other day and, in the
course of an interview with Canada's National
Post, made a sharp observation on where much of the world is headed. It's
not just fellows like Mohammed Bouyeri, the man who knifed, shot, and, for good
measure, near decapitated van Gogh. She noted the mass murderer Anders Breivik,
who killed dozens of his fellow Norwegians supposedly as a protest against the
Islamization of Europe — if one is to believe a rambling manifesto that cited
her, me, Jefferson, Churchill, Gandhi, Hans Christian Andersen, and many
others. Much media commentary described Breivik as a "Christian." But
he had been raised by conventional Eurosecularists, and did not attend a church
of any kind. On the other hand, he was very smitten by the Knights Templar.
"He's not a worshiping Christian but he's become
a political Christian," said Ayaan, "and so he's reviving political
Christianity as a counter to political Islam. That's regression, because one of
the greatest achievements of the West was to separate politics from
religion." Blame multiculturalism, she added, which is also regressive: In
her neck of the Horn of Africa, "identity politics" is known as
tribalism.
That's a shrewd insight. We already accept
"political Islam." Indeed, we sentimentalize it — dignifying the
victory of the Islamist Ennahda party in post–Ben Ali Tunisia, the restoration
of full-bore polygamy in post-Qaddafi Libya, and the slaughter of Coptic
Christians in post-Mubarak Egypt as an "Arab Spring." On the very day
Miss Hirsi Ali's interview appeared, the mob caught up with the world's
longest-serving non-hereditary head of state. Colonel Qaddafi had enlivened the
U.N. party circuit for many years with his lavish ball gowns, but, while he was
the Arab League's only literal transvestite, that shouldn't obscure the fact
that most of his fellow dictators are also playing dress-up. They may claim to
be "pan-Arabists" or "Baathists," but in the end they
represent nothing and no one but themselves and their Swiss bank accounts. When
their disgruntled subjects went looking for something real to counter the
hollow kleptocracies, Islam was the first thing to hand. There is not much contemplation
of the divine in your average mosque, but, as a political blueprint, Islam was
waiting, and ready.
Multicultural Europe is not Mubarak's Egypt, but,
north of the Mediterranean as much as south, the official state ideology is
insufficient. The Utopia of Diversity is already frantically trading land for
peace, and unlikely to retain much of either. In the "Islamic Republic of
Tower Hamlets" — the heart of London's East End, where one sees more
covered women than in Amman — police turn a blind eye to misogyny, Jew-hatred,
and gay-bashing for fear of being damned as "racist." Male infidel
teachers of Muslim girls are routinely assaulted. Patrons of a local gay pub
are abused, and beaten, and, in one case, left permanently paralyzed.
The hostelry that has so attracted the ire of the
Muslim youth hangs a poignant shingle: The George and Dragon. It's one of the oldest
and most popular English pub names. The one just across the Thames on Borough
High Street has been serving beer for at least half a millennium. But no one
would so designate a public house today. The George and Dragon honors the
patron saint of England, and it is the cross of Saint George — the flag of
England — under which the Crusaders fought. They brought back the tale from
their soldiering in the Holy Land: In what is now Libya, Saint George
supposedly made the Sign of the Cross, slew the dragon, and rescued the damsel.
Within living memory, every English schoolchild knew the tale, if not all the
details — e.g., the dragon-slaying so impressed the locals that they converted
to Christianity. But the multicultural establishment slew the dragon of England's
racist colonialist imperialist history, and today few schoolchildren have a
clue about Saint George. So the pub turned gay and Britain celebrated
diversity, and tolerance, and it never occurred to them that, when you tolerate
the avowedly intolerant, it's only an interim phase. There will not be infidel
teachers in Tower Hamlets for much longer, nor gay bars.
The "multicultural society" was an
unnecessary experiment. And, in a post-prosperity Europe, demographic
transformation is an unlikely recipe for social tranquility. If Ayaan Hirsi Ali
is right, more than a few Europeans cut off from their inheritance and adrift
in lands largely alien to them will seek comfort in older identities. In the
Crusaders' day, the edge of the maps bore the legend "Here be
dragons." They're a lot closer now.
No comments:
Post a Comment