Canada: "We Believe in Free Trade" and Will
End Dozens of Tariffs on Imports to Help Manufacturing
By Mark Perry
TORONTO (Reuters) - "Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty
said on Sunday the government would eliminate tariffs on dozens more products
used by Canadian manufacturers, aiming to lower their costs and encourage more
hiring. The initiative would scrap custom duties on 70 items used by businesses
in sectors such as food processing, furniture and transportation equipment.
Flaherty, who estimated the tariff cuts would save
Canadian businesses C$32 million ($30.5 million) a year, said the cuts were
part of the Conservative government's overall free trade policy. "We
believe in free trade in Canada," Flaherty said on CTV's
"Question Period" program. "Some of these old-fashioned tariffs
get in the way. So we're getting rid of them."
As part of its Economic Action Plan to pull Canada
through the global slowdown of 2008-09, the government has eliminated more than
1,800 tariff items, providing about C$435 million a year in tariff relief. Its
stated goal is to make Canada a tariff-free zone for manufacturers by
2015."
A few thoughts:
1. We sometimes forget that "tariffs" and
"duties" are really "taxes" on imports; and therefore
eliminating or reducing tariffs or duties is the same thing as eliminating or
reducing taxes on consumers and businesses buying foreign products. In
the same way that "tax cuts" can stimulate economic activity,
"tariff cuts" do the same, and that's the approach being taken in
Canada.
2. When it comes to helping domestic manufacturers
through trade policy, the usual approach is to impose tariffs or restrictions
on imports as a way to protect domestic producers from more efficient foreign
producers. But the Canadian case illustrates the reality that domestic
producers are often using foreign-produced inputs, parts and supplies, to
manufacture products domestically, and in that case reducing tariffs on imports
("cutting taxes") helps domestic manufacturers by lowering the cost
of their foreign inputs.
The chart above displays U.S. imports by category for
2011 (through September) and shows that roughly 58% of imported goods are: a)
industrial supplies and b) capital equipment that are being purchased by U.S.
producers. If we were to completely eliminate tariffs on imports, U.S.
manufacturers relying on foreign inputs would receive significant benefits, while
other U.S. manufacturers competing against imports would be less protected from
foreign competition.
Bottom Line: Even though we usually think of increasing exports as the route to
increased domestic manufacturing output and employment, Canada's trade policy
of reducing tariffs for its manufacturing sector highlights the important
contribution of imports to domestic manufacturing.
Update: By keeping its currency undervalued, China is in effect subsidizing American businesses and consumers buying products "Made in China." We should be thankful for that form of "foreign aid," or transfer of wealth from relatively poor Chinese to rich Americans, as unfair as that might be. If the U.S. pressures China to appreciate its currency, it would be exactly the same as imposing (or increasing) tariffs on Chinese products. And just like increased tariffs would make Americans worse off overall, I would argue that a stronger yuan would have the same result.
Update: By keeping its currency undervalued, China is in effect subsidizing American businesses and consumers buying products "Made in China." We should be thankful for that form of "foreign aid," or transfer of wealth from relatively poor Chinese to rich Americans, as unfair as that might be. If the U.S. pressures China to appreciate its currency, it would be exactly the same as imposing (or increasing) tariffs on Chinese products. And just like increased tariffs would make Americans worse off overall, I would argue that a stronger yuan would have the same result.
No comments:
Post a Comment