The energy-saving light bulb ends up as hazardous waste, too much insulation promotes mold and household drains are emitting a putrid odor because everyone is saving water. Many of Germany's efforts to protect the environment are a chronic failure, but that's unlikely to change.
By Alexander Neubacher
Germans support protecting the environment, and they
have a special relationship with nature. They like animals and plants, blue
skies and the ocean. They want their children to grow up in an intact
environment, and try to set an example for others. When it's time to save the
world, the Germans are there, doing their utmost. They are determined that
conservation efforts won't fail because of them.
Germany used to declare war on its neighbors. Today we
explain how they can renounce
nuclear power. We've lost the
title of the world's top exporter and only manage to come in third place in
global soccer rankings, but no one can get the better of us when it comes
recycling our waste. Acid rain and forest decline have opened our eyes to the
destructive force of civilization from an early age, even though Germany's
forests, contrary to expectations, have somehow survived.
Our newest goal is to minimize our ecological footprint. Thursdays are veggie days, and old-fashioned, hand-cranked washing machines are back in vogue. Websites offer environmental tips for all kinds of situations, from cosmetics based on the phases of the moon to vibrators made of plastic without toxic chemical softeners. There are urns made of cornstarch and coffins made of cardboard, so that we can embark on our final journey in an environmentally correct manner -- a final good deed before everything turns to compost.
When something benefits the environment, the need to
justify it suddenly disappears. The green label eliminates all controversy. And political parties are essentially in agreement that society cannot
do enough for the environment. No progressive politician wants to expose
himself to the career-ending suspicion that he lacks environmental
consciousness.
Outcome Ignored
Because environmental policy pursues noble goals,
politicians who specialize in the environment have a moral advantage over those
who deal with issues such as government finances, domestic security or pension
contribution rates. The positive aura in the German Environment Ministry is so
strong that it even managed to bathe a technocrat like former Environment
Minister Jürgen Trittin in a soft light. Current Environment Minister Norbert Röttgen, a cool-headed strategist who, only a few years ago,
would have liked to become the managing director of the Federation of German Industries,
now plays the environmental saint, riding his bicycle to meetings with the
chancellor.
In legislative procedure, politicians address
environmental problems with bureaucratic thoroughness. It's no accident that
Germany's Environment Ministry emerged from a department at the Interior
Ministry. Because protection of the environment usually involves burdens, or at
least inconveniences, for the economy and consumers, strict planning, control
and enforcement are indispensible, with police and regulatory law providing the
necessary instruments.
In the end, it isn't even all that important whether
an environmental protection measure achieves the desired outcome. The can
deposit has not only eliminated cans from the market, but has unfortunately
also spelled the death of the environmentally advantageous deposit bottle. No
bother, the system will remain as it is.
So what if fine particle pollution levels are
skyrocketing in environmental zones? The requirement for vehicle permit
stickers will be expanded. Contrary to expectations, energy consumption rises
in summer. And? We'll still change our clocks when the seasons change, first
setting them forward by an hour and then back by an hour.
We buy organic food, put E10 in our gas tanks and
switch to green electricity. Our roofs are covered in solar panels and our
walls plastered with insulation. This makes us feel good about ourselves. The
only question is: What exactly does the environment get out of all this? Let's
take a look at our systems for dealing with garbage, water, light and
insulation.
Garbage
I sort my garbage. There are four symmetrically
arranged containers in front of my front door: a blue one for paper and a
yellow one for plastic on the right, along with a brown one for compost and a
gray one for everything else on the left. It doesn't look very nice. It also
stinks a little, especially on summer days when I wouldn't mind sitting
outside. But I know that I have to make sacrifices.
The German ordinance on packaging is respected, and
the product recycling regulations are held in high esteem. According to the
rules of Germany's dual system of waste management, when yoghurt containers are
put into the recycling bin, they have to be "completely empty,"
"drop-free" and "spoon-clean." Some people even put the
containers in the dishwasher before stuffing them into a yellow recycling bag.
But then something strange happens. My yoghurt
container, which I've carefully rinsed and sorted, isn't recycled at all. In
fact, it's dumped into an incinerator with all the rest of the garbage and
burned.
Yes, this is allowed. By law, the dual system is
required to recycle exactly 36 percent of plastic waste. Waste disposal
companies can do what they want -- and what is most cost-effective for them --
with the remaining 64 percent. As a result, much of it ends up in waste
incinerators for what's called "thermal recycling," bringing the
cycle to a sudden end.
The federal government's council of experts on
environmental issues has argued for years that the entire system needs to be
fundamentally reconceived. In principle, two garbage cans ought to be
sufficient, say experts: one for moist garbage like food waste and diapers, and
the other for everything else.
The moist waste would first be used to generate
biogas, and then it would be incinerated. The dry waste would be sorted
automatically and as much of it as possible would be recycled. The concept has
many advantages. It's less work for citizens, for one thing. It would help the
environment, for another. Everything would be easier.
But nothing will come of it. Instead, a dispute has
now erupted between private and municipal waste disposal companies over who is
responsible for which waste. As a result, we recently got a fifth garbage bin,
the "valuable materials bin."
When I came home from work one evening, there it was:
bright orange with a capacity of 240 liters. Now there's even less room in our
driveway, but I'm sure I'll get used to it. I'm even thinking of getting a
sixth bin for waste glass, which we've been keeping in a makeshift box at the
basement staircase until now. Six garbage cans would also restore symmetry.
Water
Showerhead technology has undergone rapid development
in recent years. Less water, more air, says the European Union's environmental
design guideline. Gone are the days when it was enough for a showerhead to
simply distribute water. Today an aerosol is generated through a complicated
process in the interior of the showerhead. The moisture content in the
resulting air-water mixture is so low and the air content so high that taking a
shower feels more like getting blow-dried.
The government is even teaching our smallest citizens
how important it is to treat precious water responsibly. The Environment
Ministry's children's website admonishes them to "Think about how you can
save water! Taking a shower is better for the environment than taking a bath.
Turn off the water when you're soaping yourself. Never let the water run when
you're not using it. And maybe you can spend less time in the shower,
too."
This is all very well and good, but there's only one
problem: It stinks. Our street is filled with the stench of decay. It's
especially bad in the summer, when half of Berlin is under a cloud of gas.
A "Competency Center" established by the Berlin Water Authority recently published a list of the neighborhoods where the problem is especially egregious. Ironically, the upscale Gendarmenmarkt square tops the list. Pariser Platz, at the Brandenburg Gate, smells like a diaper pail. It isn't just a problem in Berlin. Entire neighborhoods are also affected in Hamburg, the northeastern city of Rostock and the western Ruhr region.
Our consumption has declined so much that there is not
enough water going through the pipes to wash away fecal matter, urine and food
waste, causing blockages. The inert brown sludge sloshes back and forth in the
pipes, which are now much too big, releasing its full aroma.
The water authorities are trying to offset the stench
with odor filters and perfumed gels that come in lavender, citrus and spruce
scents. But toxic heavy metals like copper, nickel and lead are also
accumulating in the sewage system. Sulfuric acid is corroding the pipes,
causing steel to rust and concrete to crumble. It's a problem that no amount of
deodorant can solve.
The waterworks must now periodically flush their pipes
and conduits. The water we save with our low-flow toilets is simply being
pumped directly through hoses into the sewage system below. On some days, an
additional half a million cubic meters of tap water is run through the Berlin
drainage system to ensure what officials call the "necessary flow
rate."
Germany has a lot of water. It has many rivers and
lakes. The amount of rain that falls from the skies over Germany is five times
as much as the entire water requirements of the entire population and industry.
Less than 3 percent of the country's water reserves would be enough to supply
all households.
The obvious solution to our pipeline problems would be
to use more water again. But that's not how the Germans work. People who have
been urged for so long to use as little water as possible when taking a shower
don't just toss their habits overboard. The conservation appeals have created
deep imprints in our psyche.
Light
Mercury is a dangerous substance. It evaporates at
room temperature. Even small amounts can damage the liver, lungs and brain.
Paracelsus, the famous physician, inadvertently killed himself with mercury.
Since then, doctors have advised against inhaling it.
This makes the renaissance of the toxic heavy metal in
our homes all the more astonishing. Like all good Europeans, we are in the
process of replacing our old light bulbs with modern energy-saving light bulbs.
This is what the European Commission has decreed. The fact that each of these
new light bulbs contains up to five milligrams of mercury is seen as a
necessary evil, because they consume less electricity than conventional light
bulbs.
We're having trouble saying goodbye to the old light
bulbs, which we liked. They came on immediately when we flipped the switch,
which is something our new light bulbs can't do. And you can't drop them onto
the floor either, because if you do the environmentally friendly light bulb
becomes an eco-killer.
"Inhaled mercury enters the brain through the
bloodstream," says Gary Zörner of the Laboratory for Chemical Analysis in
Delmenhorst in northern Germany. "And every bit of mercury makes us a
little more stupid. It can lead to total derangement."
Scientists with the German Federal Environment Agency
have done tests to determine how dangerous energy-saving light bulbs are. They
broke bulbs from the product line of a European brand-name manufacturer. Then
they measured the concentration of toxic materials in the air of the room, once
after five minutes and a second time after five hours.
All readings were well above permissible levels. In
some cases, the mercury level was 20 times as high as the benchmark value. Even
after five hours, there was still so much mercury in the air that it would have
endangered the health of pregnant women, young children and sensitive
individuals.
Because of the mercury, throwing broken energy-saving
light bulbs into the ordinary trash is of course prohibited. A waste disposal
company from Nuremberg in southern Germany has invented a machine that
carefully cuts apart each light bulb and sucks out the fluorescent material and
mercury. The mixture is then packed into airtight bags and filled into blue,
300-kilogram barrels. The barrels are loaded onto a truck and taken to a former
salt mine in the Harz Mountains of central Germany. Thus, the energy-saving
light bulb ends up in an underground waste depot, where it will remain forever
as contaminated waste.
Insulation
First the cherubs and ledges are knocked off from the
façade. Then the plaster and the pediments are removed. The old wall disappears
under insulation panels as thick as mattresses, which are then painted, and
suddenly the old house is an energy-efficient house. The old decorative
elements, which are now missing, are simply painted onto the exterior. It
doesn't make much of a difference visually, at least from a distance.
Strolling past the historic brick structures in the
Dulsberg section of Hamburg, Albert Schett of the city's monument preservation
office points out the acoustic difference between insulated and non-insulated
houses. "Listen," says Schett, as he taps the facades, which now
consist of an insulating layer covered with imitation brick. "It sounds completely
hollow." But what wouldn't we do to save a few liters of heating oil?
There is another problem, however: the people who live
in these thermally insulated houses and are complaining about their "poor
ventilation behavior," as a brochure published by the Federal Office of
Construction calls it. Unfortunately, it's all too often forgotten that any
insulation changes the interior climate. For example, it can lead to mold
spreading in places where it would never have been expected, like inside the
roller shutter box, behind radiators and underneath the windowsill.
When mold has penetrated supporting beams, the house
has to be abandoned, particularly as the insulating panels become increasingly
moist over time. "It's like putting on a wet sweater on a cold day,"
explains a construction expert. "Yes, we're becoming the world's best
insulators," says Boris Palmer, the Green Party mayor of Tübingen near
Stuttgart, "and yes, we are deliberately spoiling our building
stock."
What Can We Do?
It would be nice if we would occasionally subject our
certainties to a reality check. If it turns out that we made a mistake, there
is nothing wrong with taking a step back and trying something different. A can
deposit law that also eliminates the environmentally friendly deposit bottles should
be thoroughly reformed, and so should the subsidization of inefficient solar
energy, some of our insulation regulations and plastics recycling.
No one should be forced to bring toxic
mercury-containing light bulbs into the house. It doesn't make sense to shut
down more nuclear power plants if it just makes us dependent on imported
nuclear electricity from France. And as long as a disposal paper bag is worse
for the environment than a plastic bag, the green morals police should think
about whether it's the plastic bag that they should be banning.
People who shop in organic grocery stores, eat a vegan
diet or drive an electric car are free to do so. But this should not give them
the right to lecture others on the environmentally correct way to live their lives.
Things are sometimes more complicated than they seem at first glance.
No comments:
Post a Comment