By RICH KARLGAARD
In March 1986, Microsoft ended its first day as a
public company with a market capitalization of $780 million. Its value grew
more than 700 times that over the next 13 years and made Bill Gates, in 1999,
the richest man ever with a net worth of $101 billion. When Facebook goes
public this Friday its market cap could easily hit $100 billion, bringing
founder Mark Zuckerberg's net worth to more than $18 billion. That's about 50
times what Mr. Gates was worth after Microsoft's IPO.
Facebook's big payday should be cause for celebration in a liberal
democracy. Instead it has provoked two kinds of anxiety. Both imply America's
best days are over.
The first is that America's innovation engine, Silicon Valley, is again
overheating. Evidence: Last month Facebook swapped $1 billion in pre-IPO shares
and some cash for Instagram, a two-year-old start-up with 11 employees and no
revenue. A week later, another Silicon Valley start-up called Splunk, slyly
allied with the decades's two hottest buzz generators—cloud computing and big
data—went public at a $1.5 billion value on just $121 million in sales this
year. Yet shareholders swooned for Splunk and bid up its $17 IPO share price to
$37 in the first two days of trading.
This has to be a bubble, right?
The second worry is that only a certain kind of company is getting rich in
the Obama economy. These are outfits that make algorithms—bits of software code
cleverly strung together to take the form of an iPhone operating system, a
LinkedIn social network, or a proprietary trading scheme.
The modern-day code rockers are not mere nerds, either. They form an
Algorithmic Army of slightly surreal folks like, well, Mr. Zuckerberg. They
seem to be pale men with oddly flat voices and faraway gazes who prefer to hide
out in the bathroom during the IPO roadshow. When finally coaxed onto the stage
to face investors, the great Zuckerberg appeared in a hoodie.
That can't be America's future, can it?
The debate about whether America will own the global economy in the 21st
century or else become a dude ranch for rich Chinese and Brazilians hinges on
whether innovation can break out of the box. Can it go mainstream and transform
the really big things: transportation, energy, electricity, food production,
water delivery, health care and education?
If it can't do that—or if it is thwarted by high taxes and complex
regulation—then welcome to the new normal of 2% annual growth. Our future will
become sadly familiar. Just follow Spain, France and Great Britain down
history's sinkhole of lost status and influence.
But America can do better than that, and it will. In fact, the seeds are
being planted now. In Silicon Valley, investing in social-media companies is
already passé. Last year, as private investors were bidding up Facebook's
valuation to $100 billion, the veteran Silicon Valley investor Roger McNamee
said "the next 500 social-media companies will lose money." He's
broadly right. The time to make big returns in Facebook and in social media has
passed.
There's a growing interest among bright minds to apply "exponential
technologies" (the phrase used by Ray Kurzweil and Peter Diamandis,
founders of Singularity University) to solve problems much larger than whom to
friend on Facebook. Transportation is one of those big deals. Would you rather
own a car, an iPad or a Facebook membership? Thought so. By 2050 the planet
will have nine billion inhabitants and three billion cars. This will create
huge demand for fuel and road access.
Silicon Valley's biggest new thing, therefore, is not Instagram or Splunk
but Google's robot-driven car. The Google car is only four years old. In 2008,
it could barely get around pylons in a parking lot. Last year it got down San
Francisco's snaky Lombard Street with no human driver and today it races over
mountain passes with only R2-D2's second cousin behind the wheel. This rate of
progress is normal in the algorithmic world, but it is new in the physical
world.
Manufacturing? America will own the mid-21st century. Geopolitical
instability and rising oil prices will wreck the late 20th-century rationale
for outsourcing. Chinese labor costs are rising 20% a year while robotic costs
are dropping by 30% a year. Do the math.
"Made in the USA" is set to have a major comeback. The
showstopper will be 3-D printing, which makes physical objects from a digital
file. It will turn our artists into artisanal manufacturers and reward American-style
creativity.
Energy? America's natural-gas and shale oil boom will bridge us to 2030 or
so when solar energy and algae-based fuels will be closer to market parity and
begin to make a real contribution. As long as I'm on the topic of the natural-gas
boom, what key technology made this happy surprise possible? High-tech
horizontal drilling. Who knew? We were all too busy fiddling with our iPhone
apps to see it coming.
Question: If America could have only one of the following—Facebook, Twitter
or horizontal drilling—which would be the smarter choice?
Happily, we don't have to make that choice. America remains the world's
innovator, a country without limits.
No comments:
Post a Comment