“What I was looking at was a tussle between two groups of mass-men, one large and poor, the other small and rich. As judged by the standards of a civilised society, neither of them any more meritorious or promising than the other. The object of the tussle was the material gains accruing from control of the State’s machinery. It is easier to seize wealth than to produce it; and as long as the State makes the seizure of wealth a matter of legalised privilege, so long will the squabble for that privilege go on.”
Alfred Jay
Nock - Memoirs Of A Superfluous Man - 1943
Mr
Nock published his memoirs after a lifetime of watching the state enhance and
widen its means of making “the seizure of wealth a matter of legalised
privilege.” He recognised the process as being exactly what it was far better
than the vast majority of his fellow Americans and described it better still.
Were he alive today, he would not be surprised at the state of the world. Nor
would he be surprised at the degree of gullibility shown by the fact that most
people still cling to the hope that the perpetrators of the mess can “fix” it
if only the necessary power is invoked. He would, perhaps, be surprised that
the entire structure has not yet fallen down around the ears of those who
constructed it.
A Declining Power?
Here
is a quote from the other “sophisticate” who runs the US financial system. A
few days before Mr Bernanke’s speech, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner was
speaking at the Economic Club of Chicago. Among many other things, he said
this:
“Cutting government investments in education and infrastructure and basic science is not a growth strategy. Cutting deeply into the safety net for low-income Americans is not financially necessary and cannot plausibly help strengthen economic growth.”
Government investment is a contradiction in terms. Since a government produces no real wealth but merely expropriates it from those who do, it has nothing to invest. To buy the concept that government spending is “investment” you must also buy the concepts that taxes are “contributions” and that money created by edict out of thin air is “wealth”. But Mr Geithner goes on to talk about a “growth strategy”. It is true that any move to curtail the government’s ability to expropriate and inflate will curtail “growth”. It will in fact curtail the growth of government, a “strategy” that Mr Geithner does NOT approve.
As
for the assertion that cutting into the welfare state is “not financially
necessary”, the unasked question is - TO WHOM? Cutting very deeply indeed into
the welfare state is a necessary pre-requisite to ANY progress towards genuine
prosperity. But again, doing so would curtail the growth of government.
The
crowning glory of Mr Geithner’s latest contribution to the debate goes like
this: “This strategy is a recipe to make us a declining power.” If the “us”
here refers to Mr Geithner, Mr Bernanke, Mr Obama and all the rest, we couldn’t
agree more. And the sooner the better!
The Reason For The Fix
By
its nature, government intervention in an economy cannot take place to any
great extent until the government gains monopoly control over what is used as
money in that economy. Next year will see the centennial of the US government
putting itself in that position - the Fed was created in 1913. Once the
government DOES control the money, the intervention always increases. The size
and rapidity of that increase is inversely proportional to the REAL wealth
generating capacity of that economy. The more the government (which
produces NOTHING) interferes, the less is left over for those
who do produce.
The
US government passed a law prohibiting its citizens from owning Gold in 1933.
Shortly after that, it passed a series of laws which created the US welfare
state. By the time Americans were again allowed to own Gold in early 1975, the
government’s stranglehold on the circulating money was complete. The US Dollar
was redeemable in NOTHING. In the meantime, the US welfare state had pushed
funded and UNFUNDED government debt into the $US TRILLIONS. In the US and
everywhere in the world, we are witnessing a long delayed but always inevitable
phenomenon. The welfare state can no longer be sustained by the dwindling
wealth-creating capacity of the economy. The
jig is up.
No comments:
Post a Comment