By Charles
Hugh Smith
For those Americans earning
between $34,500 and $106,000, the real-world middle class tax burden in
high-tax locales is 15% + 25% + 5% + 15% + 15% = 75%. Yes, 75%. Before you
start listing the innumerable caveats and quibbles raised by any discussion of
taxes, please hear me out first. Let's start by defining "taxes" as
any fee that is mandated by law or legal necessity. In other words, taxes are
what is not optional.
If we include
all taxes, the real-world tax rate is much higher than the "official"
income tax rate. These "other taxes" vary from
nation to nation. France, for example, has a "television tax." It is
mandatory, and since virtually every household has a TV this operates as a
universal tax. The argument that this is "optional" is specious.
In every other advanced democracy, basic universal healthcare is paid by tax revenues. In the U.S., healthcare insurance is "optional" but this too is specious: in the real world, private healthcare insurance is mandatory because the alternative--having zero insurance--places your entire net worth and income at risk of catastrophic loss.
Having no healthcare insurance
only makes sense if you have no real assets and a low income. At that point,
your care will be provided by the taxpayer-funded Medicaid program, which is
the default universal-care program in the U.S.
Yes, the super-wealthy can
absorb a $150,000 hospital bill, but the 99.9% cannot. Thus any claim that
healthcare insurance is "optional" is specious.
Property tax is mandatory. Some countries have no
property tax, others do. Once again, only counting social-insurance and income
taxes as the "official tax rate" is horrendously misleading. For
countries without property taxes, the revenues are collected as value-added
taxes (VAT) or higher income taxes. One way or another, the services paid by
property taxes in the U.S. are paid by other tax schemes in countries without
property taxes. So property taxes must be included in any accounting of total
taxes paid.
Many of us who reside in
states such as Illinois, New York, New Jersey and California pay $12,000 or
more annually in property taxes. That is about 15% of our household income.
Renters pay the property taxes
indirectly, but to the degree that rents would be lower if property taxes were
eliminated and the tax burden shifted to a VAT, then renters "pay"
the tax just like property owners.
Employees looking at the
paycheck stubs do not see the entire tax paid on their labor. Empoyees may wonder why
their net pay has stagnated for decades. One reason is that the total
compensation costs of employees has risen substantially.
To give but one example of
many, Social Security taxes were once modest, 3% paid by the employee and 3%
paid by the employer for a total of 6% of the wage. Now the total for Social
Security (12.4%) and Medicare (2.9%) is 15.3%. Self-employed people pay the
total 15.3% as "self-employment tax." This is the real-world tax burden
of Social Security and Medicare. The 15.3% Social Security/Medicare tax starts
with dollar one of net income. The Social Security tax goes away above around
$106,000 in income, the Medicare tax does not.
Most employees do not know how
much healthcare insurance "tax" is paid by their employer. To the
degree that wages would rise if the healthcare "tax" was not paid by
employers, then employees pay for this "tax" indirectly. To act like
it isn't a mandatory part of compensation costs is both specious and
misleading.
The only transparent way to
calculate the total tax burden is to count all taxes (or equivalent) paid by
self-employed property owners. Not counting the indirect taxes of healthcare
and property taxes is misleading to the point of blatant misrepresentation. The
basic Federal income tax gives each individual earner $9,500 in standard
deductions and exemptions. The tax rate for all income above that is:
$1 to $8,500: 10%
$8,501 to $34,500: 15%
$34,501 to $83,600: 25%
$83,601 to $174,400: 28%
$174,401 to $379,150: 33%
Above $379,151: 35%
$8,501 to $34,500: 15%
$34,501 to $83,600: 25%
$83,601 to $174,400: 28%
$174,401 to $379,150: 33%
Above $379,151: 35%
These rates are scheduled to
rise at the end of 2012 unless Congress acts to maintain rates at current
levels.
Many households have gigantic
interest deductions stemming from gigantic mortgages, but let's set aside
outsized debt-based tax deductions as far from universal.
Above a rather modest $34,600 in taxable income and up to around $106,000, the real-world middle class tax burden in high-tax American locales is 75%: Social Security and Medicare: 15.3%
Above a rather modest $34,600 in taxable income and up to around $106,000, the real-world middle class tax burden in high-tax American locales is 75%: Social Security and Medicare: 15.3%
Federal income tax: 25% (28%
above $83,600)
State income tax: 5%
(mid-range)
Healthcare insurance: 15%
Property tax: 15% 15%
+ 25% + 5% + 15% + 15% = 75%
Clearly, the percentage of
income devoted to healthcare insurance and property taxes declines as income
rises. Someone earning $200,000 has not only dropped the 12.4% Social Security
tax for income above $106,000, healthcare insurance and property taxes as a
percentage of their income drops from about 30% for those earning around
$86,000 to 15%.
We can argue fruitlessly about
how many tax angels can dance on the head of a pin, but all the caveats and
quibbles don't change the basic fact that real-world tax rate for the
"middle class" earning more than $34,500 in taxable income in
high-tax locales is a confiscatory 75%.
Please don't tell me the U.S.
is a "low-tax" nation; I might suffer a breakdown that I couldn't
afford due to exclusions in my "voluntary" healthcare coverage.
No comments:
Post a Comment