Syria’s Alawite heartland is defined by its funerals.
In Qirdaha in the mountainous Latakia province, hometown of the Assad dynasty,
I watched as two police motorcycles drove up the hill, pictures of Bashar
mounted on their windshields. An ambulance followed, carrying the body of a
dead lieutenant colonel from state security. As the convoy passed, the men
around me let off bursts of automatic fire. My local guides were embarrassed
that I had seen this display, and claimed it was the first time it had
happened. ‘He is a martyr, so it is considered a wedding.’ Schoolchildren and
teachers lining the route threw rice and flower petals. ‘There is no god but
God and the martyr is the beloved of God!’ they chanted. Hundreds of mourners
in black walked up through the village streets to the local shrine. ‘Welcome,
oh martyr,’ they shouted. ‘We want no one but Assad!’
It was April, my sixth month travelling through Syria.
After I left I heard of another funeral not far away, in the village of Ras
al-Ayn, near the coast. A village of seven thousand people now had seven
martyrs from the security forces, six missing or captured and many wounded.
‘Every day we have martyrs,’ an officer said. ‘It’s all a sacrifice for the
nation.’ Another talked about ‘their’ crimes, and said ‘they’ had killed the
soldier because he was an Alawite. One of my guides berated him for speaking of
the conflict in sectarian terms in front of me. ‘The opposition have left us no
choice,’ another soldier said. ‘They accept nothing but killing.’
Alawites – the heterodox Shia sect to which the Assads
belong and which remains most loyal to the president and his government – make
up about 10 per cent of the population. Most Syrians – about 65 per cent – are
Sunni Arabs. The Alawites are one of several minorities, along with Sunni Kurds
and Christians, the Druze, non-Alawite Shi’ites and Ismailis. But they have
always been seen as a special case. Few Alawites are familiar with the tenets
of Alawite faith: they are known by initiates only. But belief in the
transmigration of the soul, reincarnation and the divinity of the Prophet’s
cousin Ali – in a trinity comprising Ali, Muhammad and one of his companions,
Salman al Farisi – puts Alawites at a remove from mainstream Islam. For most
Alawites, religion is less a rigorous faith than an expression of their
culture.
Alawite identity turns on a minority complex and fear
of Sunni domination. Alawites like to rehearse the story of their oppression.
‘The lot of the Alawis was never enviable,’ the Palestinian historian Hanna
Batatu wrote. ‘Under the Ottomans they were abused, reviled and ground down by
exactions and, on occasion, their women and children led into captivity and
disposed of by sale.’ They were practically serfs to the Sunni feudal lords put
in place by the Ottomans. It was only when the French mandate began in 1920
that the traditional Sunni elite was eroded and minorities, Alawites among
them, began to enjoy a measure of social mobility. The Alawites pleaded in vain
with the French to grant them a separate state that would protect them from a
Sunni ascendancy.
To Alawites, the pan-Arab doctrine of the Ba’ath
Party, which took power in a coup in 1963, was a way to transcend sectarian
identity. The army and the civil service gave them a way out of their
impoverished villages. Soon all kinds of people with rural backgrounds, but
Alawites especially, began to dominate the non-commissioned officer corps and
the military academies. In 1971 Hafez al-Assad, an Alawite and a former
commander of the air force, now the minister of defence, led a coup against a
Ba’athist rival. When Hafez died in 2000, after thirty years in power, his son
Bashar took over. In that time Alawites had gone from marginalised minority to
protégés of the state, and the state in turn became the bulwark of Alawite
identity. ‘Working for cohesion at the present juncture is the strong fear
among Alawis of every rank that dire consequences for all Alawis could ensue
from an overthrow or collapse of the existing regime,’ Batatu wrote in 1981.
Historically, Alawites stood so far at the margins of
Islam that Assad the elder had to ‘Islamise’ them in order to be accepted as
the ruler of Syria by its Sunni majority. Alawites regard themselves as more
‘liberal’ and secular than mainstream Muslims. They point to their use of
alcohol, the Western dress codes of Alawite women and their freer interaction
with men. Sometimes they disparage the more conservative Sunnis. They remember
the Muslim Brotherhood uprising of the 1980s as a time of sectarian violence in
which the regime crushed terrorists; Sunnis think of it as a time of regime
brutality during which they were collectively targeted. These days it’s hard to
find a Sunni member of the opposition who didn’t lose an uncle or have a father
or grandfather imprisoned in the crackdown that followed. The opposition has
said nothing about what would or should be done with the hundreds of thousands
of men in the security forces if the present regime falls. Alawites believe
they have reason to be afraid.
In the coastal province of Tartus and other parts of
the Alawite heartland, countless new loyalist checkpoints have been set up,
manned by the Syrian Army or by paramilitary members of popular committees in a
mix of civilian clothes and military gear. The countryside has armed itself. In
May I visited the mountain town of Sheikh Badr in Tartus province. Forty-three
townsmen in the security forces had been killed; seven others had been captured
or were missing. While I was in the mayor’s office he received news that a
wounded soldier had just been brought in. Sheikh Badr’s first martyr was killed
in Daraa in April 2011, one month into the uprising. Its most recent, a colonel
killed in Damascus, was buried two days before I visited.
The town is known for its shrine to Sheikh Saleh
al-Ali, an anti-colonial figure who fought the French. ‘In a famous speech he
rejected the idea of an independent Alawite state because he loved the
country,’ the mayor said, reciting part of the speech to me from memory while
Abu Haidar, a local security man, listened on. ‘We don’t believe in Hafez
al-Assad because he was Alawite but because he was great patriot,’ the security
man said. ‘Can any regime rule for forty years without the consent of its
people?’ The mayor struggled when I asked him how he would respond to a new
president ruling Syria. Like most Alawites I met he couldn’t imagine a government
without an Assad. One of the men with him wondered why – in Libya, Tunisia,
Egypt, Saudi Arabia and elsewhere – the West was supporting Islamists rather
than ‘the more secular and advanced movements’. The mayor, like many regime
supporters, believed there was an Islamist conspiracy in the region. To him,
the uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya were not a spontaneous eruption of
popular protest but an organised conspiracy connecting the US, the Muslim
Brotherhood and Arab Gulf countries. ‘This is not a popular movement, this is a
Salafi movement,’ one of the men said. ‘What did the revolutions in Tunisia,
Libya, Egypt achieve?’ Abu Haidar asked. The rise to power of Islamists in
those three countries made government supporters even more uncomfortable at the
prospect of regime change.
I asked the security men why Bashar had only started
his (timid) reforms after the protests in Syria began in March 2011. Abu Haidar
answered as regime supporters always do that events in 2003 (the invasion of
Iraq), 2005 (the assassination of the Lebanese prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri
and the Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon), 2006 (Israel’s war on Lebanon), 2008
(internal fighting in Lebanon) ‘prevented us from having the freedom to
reform’. I asked them if security forces had shot at unarmed demonstrators.
They all said no and insisted that the regime had prohibited the use of weapons
against protesters. I knew this to be false. In six months in Syria I had been
at more than a hundred opposition demonstrations. I had been shot at in many of
them. Once a young man standing beside me who had thrown a rock was shot in the
abdomen and killed.
To travel safely through Alawite areas I hired an
off-duty state security sergeant called Abu Laith. He was from Rabia, a town in
the Hama countryside. In the year I had known him he seemed never to eat but
smoked nargileh pipes every chance he had; he was constantly on the phone
arranging deals for his second job as a cigarette smuggler. His salary was
17,000 liras a month, about £160. ‘We don’t have connections in the state,’ he
told me, and therefore can’t get civil service jobs: ‘we cannot find employment
except in the army or security.’ By selling smuggled cigarette cartons he could
make an extra 1000 to 1500 liras a day. Several of his brothers were in the
army or police. As we drove through areas he didn’t know he would ask people
how to avoid Sunni towns. In some areas locals had plotted circuitous routes
through Alawite and Christian towns, with arrows spraypainted on walls in one village
pointing to the next so that bus drivers and others could avoid opposition
strongholds. When we came close to Sunni areas Abu Laith loaded his Makarov
pistol. ‘So I won’t go cheaply,’ he explained. ‘The most important thing is you
don’t go cheaply.’ He told me that about a hundred men from his regional
security force had been killed and two hundred injured. Five of his cousins had
been killed.
Most of Rabia’s men serve in the army or security
forces elsewhere in the country. Many live in military housing complexes or
have settled in the working-class Alawite neighbourhoods of greater Damascus.
Qudsaya, a Sunni suburb of Damascus, has two Alawite areas, one called Wurud
and the other named after the Republican Guard, whose soldiers were given
housing there. Both areas border working-class Sunni neighbourhoods, and since
the uprising began there have been clashes between communities. Many of the
buildings in Wurud were hastily and illegally constructed on state land. The
authorities turn a blind eye to these informal settlements because the
residents are pillars of the security forces. Here, as in the villages most of
them came from, few roads are paved and services are poor. But despite the
neglect they remain stalwart regime supporters, its praetorian guard on the
streets. The security men who showed me round stressed the poverty of the area
to prove that Alawites don’t benefit from the regime. ‘We never asked for
anything, we don’t want anything, we just want security.’
When Abu Laith took me to Rabia itself, news of our
arrival spread quickly. Thousands of residents staged a seemingly spontaneous
but clearly sincere demonstration in support of the regime in the centre of
town, next to a statue of Hafez al-Assad holding an olive branch and a sword.
The statue, paid for by locals, was erected after the uprising started. Behind
it was a massive poster with a picture of Hafez and Bashar. On it was written
‘Rabia is the lion’s den,’ a play on the word assad, which means
‘lion’. I was dragged from house to house so people could speak of their dead
and wounded relatives, and of Rabia’s 42 martyrs. I told one group of local men
that when I visited opposition strongholds like Baba Amr in Homs I always heard
similar stories about fathers or sons being martyred. ‘Our sons were just going
to work,’ an army colonel whose nephew was killed in Idlib said in reply.
‘There is a difference between killing a man going to work for the state and
killing an armed man taking up weapons against the state. Is it peaceful
demonstrators who kill five officers at a checkpoint?’
For the past year Rabia’s Alawites have clashed with
neighbouring Sunni villages. Last summer the town’s students couldn’t travel
into the city of Hama to take their exams because the opposition had blocked
the road. Around thirty Alawite families from one nearby majority Sunni village
have settled in Rabia, feeling it was no longer safe to stay where they were.
The displaced families were disappointed with the government’s response. ‘We
didn’t have any weapons or we would have fought back,’ one man told me. ‘They
should have sent in tanks but the opposition blocked the roads. We want the
state to solve our problems and the army to return us to our land. The army has
to enter the villages, but the army is busy in Hama. Why is the state taking
its time?’ Abu Laith’s father, a retired soldier, agreed. ‘Only the army can
solve this,’ he said. ‘If we respond ourselves it will be seen as sectarian
violence and other villages will join them against us. They will outnumber us.’
From Rabia I headed north-west towards Aziziya, a
remote Alawite village which has clashed with the neighbouring Sunni village of
Tamana. As in most Alawite villages, the majority of its men work in security
or the army. Its Sunni neighbours all support the opposition, and opposition
militias have been operating in the area since last spring. Salhab, the nearest
town of any size, contains hundreds of displaced Alawite mothers and children
who have fled the village. The fight between Aziziya and Tamana showed no sign
of abating and in the town I found several families in a near hysterical state.
A woman who’d recently reached Salhab shouted at me: ‘We left under fire! Our
dignity is precious! Our leader is honourable! They are traitors! Everything
for Bashar!’
‘We asked the state for reinforcements,’ another
complained, ‘and they didn’t send them.’ All agreed that relations with their
Sunni neighbours had been close until the uprising. ‘We were neighbours,’ one
mother told me, ‘eating together, going to each other’s houses. Then there was
sectarian incitement. They would come out and demonstrate and curse.’ Despite
their frustration with the regime’s inability to protect them – you hear this
in many Alawite communities – they wanted me to know how devoted they were to
Bashar. ‘They can kill us all,’ one woman said, ‘but if there is one left he
will still support the president.’ It’s an intriguing contradiction. Alawites
regard themselves as the country’s poorest citizens, with their origins in
lowly villages, thoroughly neglected by Damascus, and yet they’re willing to
die in droves for the very state they argue has failed to protect them.
Early in the uprising I had got to know Dr Yahya
al-Ahmad, an influential figure in one of the middle-class Alawite parts of
Homs. Then, his main concern had been to work alongside Sunni friends to reduce
sectarian tensions. I was sitting on the roof of his building during one of his
meetings when snipers suddenly opened fire on us. Nobody was hurt; the doctor
and his colleagues suspected that the snipers weren’t members of the opposition
but extreme regime loyalists. When we met again earlier this year things had
deteriorated – the building had been mortared twice by the opposition – and he
spent most of his time in a nearby town. Nearly all the local shops were shut.
He told me that Alawites had been kidnapped, and that other Alawite men had
retaliated with force. I asked how many Alawites had been killed. ‘The dead, the
numbers?’ he replied. ‘The clock stopped ticking. The numbers stopped
mattering.’ My friends in the opposition said much the same of their own dead.
‘Armed men control things,’ Yahya went on. ‘I am
armed. It’s a response, if the state fails to provide security then it’s down
to me. You cannot, as an Alawite, put all your trust in the state. What if the
security man at the checkpoint is asleep?’ Yahya’s position had changed. ‘A
year ago if you’d asked me who could replace Bashar al-Assad I’d have said: this
guy or that guy. Ask me today and I’ll tell you I don’t accept anyone but
Bashar al-Assad.’ But there was the same ambivalence one finds in many
Alawites. ‘Bashar weakened the role of security in daily life, which is one of
the reasons for this situation.’ I wanted him to acknowledge the enormous
civilian death toll that has resulted from the government’s crackdown.
‘Innocent people are always killed,’ he said. ‘You can’t distinguish whether a
target is innocent or not. Do you think there is any authority in the world
that wouldn’t defend itself?’
A senior security figure, responsible for Homs among
other places, told me that eighty officers and NCOs were in detention for
‘mistakes’ – abuse, atrocities, torture – and at least ten could expect
fifteen-year sentences. The assertion seemed meaningless in the face of the
regime’s violence against civilians. (If the security services have made any
attempt to discipline their personnel, they haven’t publicised it.) Alawites
aren’t wrong to feel that for all the fury of its repression, the state is at a
loss to know how to protect them. It is this feeling, above all, that has led
to the growth of the increasingly powerful independent loyalist militias who
act with impunity and often embarrass the regime. The militias have been
responsible for several massacres in Homs and Hama, but Bashar is in no
position to bear down on his most diehard supporters. An engineer in Homs, an
Alawite who had joined the opposition, told me that the first time he saw
loyalist gangs in action was in March 2011. ‘It was random and nobody organised
them,’ he said. ‘They only had clubs. But by July they were organised. Now they
work on their own account … The most dangerous thing in a civil war is the
people who live off it and depend on it financially. I saw this in Lebanon. In
Homs it’s open civil war.’
In the days of Hafez al-Assad the term shabiha, which means ‘ghosts’, referred only to
organised criminals and smugglers who co-operated with the security forces.
Some were part of the Assad clan – Bashar’s brother famously crushed and jailed
elements of the Assad shabiha who got out of control – but by no means all were
Alawites. When the uprising started, however, the word shabiha quickly came to refer to the loyalist
militias, and in due course to any government loyalists. Soon many loyalists
could be heard at pro-regime rallies directing chants at the opposition: ‘We
are the shabiha! Screw your freedom! Shabiha for ever!’ There are thousands of
shabiha, or popular committee members, in the Alawite neighbourhoods of Homs, a
security officer told me. They are not paid for their militia activities, he
said, but they continue to draw their government salaries even though they no
longer go to work. They answer to local mayors. ‘They can arrest somebody from
Khaldiyeh or Bayada,’ he said, naming two Sunni neighbourhoods, ‘and hand him
over to security forces. They co-ordinate with security.’
The opposition engineer in Homs was more blunt: ‘A
shabih is somebody who loves Bashar more than Bashar. A shabih is a culture not
a person. He feels he is above the law, he is the law … For now the state can
control them but I don’t know if they can control them in the future. The state
is using them now. The state did it.’ Alawites who join the opposition, he
added, are regarded as traitors against the sect. Some Alawites who were active
in the opposition in Homs, as he is, had died at the hands of loyalist
militias: in April 2011 in one of Homs’s main squares, an opposition sit-in
which even included some Alawites ended in a massacre by security forces and
popular committee men.
What becomes of the Alawites if the regime falls, and
what becomes of Bashar’s support base as a whole, are not the same question.
Bashar’s following includes other minorities besides the Alawites, not to
mention Sunnis. From the outset the government has described the opposition as
motivated by sectarianism – an accusation that encourages the very tendency it
claims to deplore – but it has carefully refrained from any show of sectarianism
itself, even if its Alawite supporters are less fastidious. Loyalists say that
they are diverse while the opposition is almost entirely Sunni. Yet Sunni
officers and soldiers belong to some of the most elite army units such as the
4th Division and the Republican Guard, and many opposition intellectuals have
admitted that if the government’s base was confined to Alawites, it would have
fallen long ago. Were this struggle to be reduced to a bald conflict between
Sunnis and Alawites the government would lose its Sunni support and be left
with only 10 per cent of the population behind it, plus a few stragglers from
the other minorities.
When I asked Abu Rateb, leader of the Homs military
council, what would happen to the security forces and shabiha, the hundreds of
thousands of armed Alawites, if the government fell, he told me I was
exaggerating the numbers. He foresaw what he described as ‘slaughter’ but felt
that an alternative to Bashar would emerge from within the regime and preside
over a settlement. ‘Bashar is the central figure for them. They will be broken
by the fall of Bashar and lose motivation.’ After a difficult transition a new
Syria would be born, ‘a free Syria, just and democratic’. A leading insurgent
in Duma, the largest suburb of Damascus, told me he worried about fighting
between Sunni and Alawite villages like Aziziya and Tamana. ‘We can’t say that
we have the right to live here and they do not,’ he said, but ‘after the
revolution Alawites will return to their natural place. They won’t have the authority.’
It is not clear what that ‘natural place’ would be.
Are they meant to leave the cities and resume their traditional links with the
rural areas? A new generation of Syria pundits in the West is already
discussing the possibility of a separate Alawite state, but one hears of no
such thing from the Alawites themselves. Syria has long been their central
project, and their mode of involvement has been to leave their villages and
move towards a version of modernity. It is conceivable that they will end up in
some form of autonomous enclave as a result of a civil war in which the
opposition gains the upper hand, but it is not their wish. They believe they
are fighting for the old Ba’athist ideals of Syrian and Arab nationalism. An
Alawite state would not be viable in any case: the old Alawite heartlands have
never had much in the way of utilities or employment opportunities and the
community would be dependent on outside backers such as Russia or Iran. A
Lebanese solution for Syria, in which different areas have different outside
backers, may be the end result, but it is nobody’s goal.
No comments:
Post a Comment