By Bloomberg
An accelerating flight of deposits from banks in four European countries is jeopardizing the renewal of economic growth and undermining a main tenet of the common currency: an integrated financial system.By Yalman Onaran
A total of 326
billion euros ($425 billion) was pulled from banks in Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Greece in the 12 months ended
July 31, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The plight of Irish and Greek
lenders, which were bleeding cash in 2010, spread to Spain and Portugal last
year.
The flight of
deposits from the four countries coincides with an increase of about 300
billion euros at lenders in seven nations considered the core of the euro zone, including Germany and France, almost matching the outflow.
That’s leading to a fragmentation of credit and a two-tiered banking system
blocking economic recovery and blunting European Central Bank policy in the
third year of a sovereign-debt crisis.
“Capital flight is
leading to the disintegration of the euro zone and divergence between the
periphery and the core,” said Alberto Gallo, the London-based head of
European credit research at Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc. “Companies pay 1
to 2 percentage points more to borrow in the periphery. You can’t get growth to
resume with such divergence.”
Lending Rates
The erosion of
deposits is forcing banks in those countries to pay more to retain them -- as
much as 5 percent in Greece. The higher
funding costs are reflected in lending rates to companies and consumers. The
average rate for new loans to non- financial corporations in July was above 7
percent in Greece, 6.5 percent in Spain and 6.2 percent in Italy, according to ECB data. It
was 4 percent in Germany, France and the Netherlands.
Some of the
decline in deposits is because German and French banks are reducing their
exposure. They cut lending to their counterparts in the four peripheral
countries plus Italy by $100 billion in the 12 months ended March 31, according
to the latest data available from the Bank for International
Settlements. ECB data count interbank lending as deposits, as well as money being held
for corporations and households.
Banks in the core
countries also have been reducing their holdings of Spanish, Portuguese,
Italian, Irish and Greek government bonds. At the same time, lenders in
the periphery have been buying more of their own governments’ debt. That has
further contributed to the fragmentation of credit along national lines, as
banks collect deposits from people and companies in their own countries and
lend internally.
IMF Warning
Organizations such
as the International Monetary
Fund have warned about the danger of such fragmentation. Financial
disintegration along national lines “caps the benefits from economic and
financial integration” that underlie the common currency, the IMF wrote in an
April report.
The disintegration
can fuel a cycle of deteriorating economic conditions and weakening banks, said
David Powell, a Bloomberg LP economist based in London. The more banks pay for
deposits the less profitable some of their businesses are, he said. A Spanish
lender that borrows at 4 percent from depositors and is limited by Europe-wide
interest rates to charging only 2.5 percent for a mortgage is losing money.
“The financial
divergence is a symptom of the underlying economic divergence, but they feed on
each other, making it harder to break out of,” Powell said. “Until companies
and individuals are convinced that the euro will survive, they won’t invest in
the periphery, and that will keep funds away.”
ECB Loans
The ECB has taken
the place of depositors and other creditors who have pulled money out over the
past two years, largely through its longer-term refinancing operation, known as
LTRO. The Frankfurt-based central bank was providing 820 billion euros to
lenders in the five countries at the end of July, data compiled by Bloomberg
show. Irish and Greek central banks loaned an additional 148 billion euros to
firms that couldn’t come up with enough collateral to meet ECB requirements.
Because
central-bank financing is counted as a deposit from another financial
institution, the official data mask some of the deterioration. Subtracting
those amounts reveals a bigger flight from Spain, Ireland, Portugal and Greece.
For Italian banks, what appears as a 10 percent increase is actually a decrease
of less than 1 percent.
When financing by
central banks isn’t counted, the data show that Greek deposits declined by 42 billion
euros, or 19 percent, in the 12 months through July. Spanish savings dropped
224 billion euros, or 10 percent; Ireland’s 37 billion, or 9 percent;
Portugal’s 22 billion, or 8 percent.
Accelerating Flight
The pace of
withdrawals has increased this year. Spanish bank deposits fell 7 percent from
the beginning of January through the end of July, compared with a 4 percent
drop the previous six months. The decline in Portuguese savings accelerated to
6 percent from 1 percent, while Irish deposits fell 10 percent compared with
almost no change in the last six months of 2011.
Banco
Santander SA (SAN), Spain’s largest bank, lost 6.3 percent of its domestic deposits in July,
according to data published by the nation’s banking association. Savings at
Banco Popular Espanol SA, the sixth-biggest, fell 9.5 percent the same month.
Eurobank Ergasias
SA, Greece’s second-largest lender, lost 22 percent of its customer deposits in
the 12 months ended March 31, according to the latest data available from the
firm. Alpha Bank SA (ALPHA), the country’s third-biggest,
lost 26 percent of client savings during that period.
The ECB data
include items such as deposits by securitization funds that Spanish banks say
they don’t rely on for financing their businesses. Household and company
deposits nationwide are stable if financing from instruments such as commercial
paper sold to retail clients is included, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya
Argentaria SA (BBVA) said in a Sept. 4 report.
Irish Banks
Irish government
officials and bank executives say deposits at three government-backed banks
have stabilized after almost three years of outflows. Bank of
Ireland Plc, the largest lender, saw its customer deposits rise by 11 percent in the
year ended June 30, according to regulatory filings. Ireland also hosts dozens
of foreign institutions that use Dublin as an offshore base to benefit from
lower tax rates and whose movements of funds would show up in the ECB’s Irish
data.
Ireland
nationalized almost all of its domestic banks in 2010, forcing them to
recognize losses on real-estate lending, and injected 63 billion euros to keep
them alive. Spain has resisted a similar cleanup that could cost several
hundred billion euros, according to some estimates. After agreeing to 100
billion euros of potential assistance from the EU in June, the Spanish
government still hasn’t decided how much of that to tap or what to do with its
troubled lenders.
Plugging Holes
ECB cash may have
plugged holes at lenders that otherwise would have had to sell assets at
fire-sale prices as they lost private financing. The aid didn’t prevent funding
costs from rising for the rest of the banks’ borrowing, including deposits.
While Italian
lenders arrested the decline in deposits this year, they paid a high price to
do so, with average deposit rates jumping 50 percent to 3.1 percent in July from a year
earlier, ECB data show. That’s more than the 2.4 percent paid by Spanish banks,
whose deposit wars were halted by a rate cap last year. Those limits were
lifted last month, and Spanish firms have begun raising interest rates on deposits again.
The average
deposit cost at German banks in July was 1.5 percent. Two years ago, Italian
and German deposit rates were the same, at 1.3 percent.
Loan Pricing
The difference in
funding costs is reflected in loan pricing. Italian rates on consumer loans of
less than one year, at 8.2 percent on average, exceeded even those in Greece
and Portugal, ECB data show. Spanish consumers had to pay 7.3 percent to borrow
from their banks, compared with 4.5 percent for German borrowers.
Another blow to
financial integration is the localization of borrowing and lending. Units of
German, French and Dutch banks in Spain, Italy and other peripheral countries
also borrowed from the ECB to reduce the need for funds from their parent
companies. Deutsche Bank AG, Germany’s largest bank, said last week it had cut
the reliance of units on financing by the Frankfurt-based firm 87 percent
through ECB loans.
While the largest
banks say they’re protecting themselves against currency redenomination in case
a country leaves the union, such moves help exacerbate divisions between the
periphery and the core. A locally financed Deutsche Bank unit can’t make loans that
reflect the cheaper funding sources of its parent in Germany.
‘Backdoor Bailout’
By taking over the
financing of weak banks, the ECB is in effect bailing out their creditors in
the core, according to Edward Harrison, an analyst at Global Macro Advisors, an
economic consulting firm in Bethesda, Maryland. If Irish or Spanish lenders
burdened with losses from their nations’ housing busts were allowed to fail,
German and French banks would lose money on loans to financial institutions in
Europe’s periphery.
The ECB’s latest
plan to buy the sovereign bonds of some countries will continue the trend of
bailing out German and French banks, Harrison said.
“The leaders of
the core countries won’t let the periphery countries write down their debt
because then they’d have to capitalize their own banks losing money from those
investments,” Harrison said. “This is a good backdoor bailout of their banks,
but it still doesn’t solve the solvency issue of Spain or Italy.”
The rescue shifts default risk from private
shareholders of core banks to the ECB and, in effect, to euro-area taxpayers.
When Greece restructured its debt earlier this year, so much of it already had
been transferred to the public that losses by European banks outside Greece
were cut in half. Because the ECB and other government lenders wouldn’t take
any losses, the debt load wasn’t reduced enough to make it sustainable.
Bond Yields
The ECB’s offer to
purchase Spanish and Italian government bonds -- if those countries ask for
help and agree to conditions imposed in exchange for the assistance -- would
reduce yields, which have fallen in expectation of the move. Still, the
purchases won’t bring down borrowing costs for companies and consumers in those
countries because banks will continue to pay higher rates for their funding,
according to RBS’s Gallo.
Unlike in the
U.S., where the Federal Reserve’s buying of securities in
2009 and 2010 brought down mortgage rates immediately, there isn’t
as strong a connection in Europe between bond yields and loan rates, Gallo
said.
Increased funding
costs for Italian banks are purely a reflection of the sovereign’s borrowing
costs, not weakness in the banking system, according to Bank of Italy Deputy
Director General Salvatore Rossi. When Italian government-bond yields decline,
banks’ funding costs should too, he said.
‘Vicious Cycle’
“Our banking
system was in good shape before the crisis,” Rossi said in an interview in New York. “If the spread goes down,
credit-market conditions would ease, contributing to halt a vicious cycle,
which is hampering economic activity.”
That spread, the difference between the
yields of Italian sovereigns and the German bunds, fell to 342 basis points
yesterday from a high of 536 in July. One basis point is 0.01 percentage point.
While Italian
banks are affected by their government’s debt overhang, some increased funding
costs result from a rising level of bad loans, Gallo said. The ratio of
nonperforming loans to total lending in Italy has almost tripled since 2008 to
5.6 percent in May, Italian Banking Association data show.
European Union
leaders have acknowledged the dangers of a two-tiered banking system, which is
accentuated by deposit flows from south to north and diverging borrowing costs.
“We cannot pursue price stability now when we have a
fragmented euro zone,” ECB President Mario Draghi told European lawmakers
Sept. 3.
Banking Union
Draghi has said
that the central bank’s plan to buy sovereign bonds addresses the divisions.
Euro-area leaders also have responded by attempting to establish a banking
union. Shared deposit guarantees, a central regulator and a resolution
mechanism for bad banks backed by common funds from member states could reduce concerns
that customers will lose money when lenders fail, halting the deposit shift
from south to north.
The European
Commission unveiled its proposal for such a banking union last week as directed
by leaders in June. The commission is initially focused on a centralized
supervisor, with other elements such as the deposit guarantee to come later.
Even the
supervision proposal has generated controversy. While there’s agreement the ECB
should play a key role overseeing banks, EU members are divided about how it
will interact with national regulators and the scope of its powers.
‘Difficult Road’
Germany, which
spent about 50 billion euros to rescue its failed lenders in 2008, has opposed
placing all banks under ECB supervision. At an EU finance ministers’ meeting in
Cyprus last weekend, Germany was joined by the Netherlands in warning against a
hasty move toward central supervision, while non-euro members such as Sweden
criticized the plan for not protecting those outside the common currency.
While a banking
union is seen as a first step toward a more fiscally united euro zone, getting
there will be politically challenging and take longer than initially
envisioned, according to Alexander White, European political analyst at
JPMorgan Chase & Co. in London. Euro-area leaders had called for the
establishment of a central supervisor by January, a date which now looks
unlikely, White said.
“We’re still left
with very big political questions about who pays for all this, how the
backstops work and so on,” White said during a conference call with clients
last week. “The proposals are going to be quite difficult for quite a lot of
member states. It’s going to be a difficult road ahead.”
No comments:
Post a Comment