By Theodore Dalrymple
Returning to England recently
via Heathrow, I was at once struck by the prevalence of compulsory television
in our country. It is as if no one is expected to be able to amuse himself with
his own thoughts for longer than it takes to walk from the plane to the
immigration desks.
High above those desks were
huge screens, relaying the Paraolympics. Somehow, such screens draw the human
eye to them as magnet draw iron filings; it is very difficult to ignore them
entirely, so difficult indeed that one might be distracted from reading fully
the notices informing clients or customers of the ‘UK Border Agency’ about how
seriously it takes assaults upon its staff. Judging by the absence of
such notices in other countries, one can only conclude that, for some reason,
foreigners find British immigration officials particularly objectionable.
Once through immigration and
on to the Heathrow Express, you are subjected to the same combination of
entertainment and menace. Heathrow Express TV breaks into its programmes to
tell you that, in the interests of security and safety you might be subjected
to search on the train, and you are asked in advance to co-operate in your own
humiliation. Then the entertainment resumes.
In theory it is possible to
escape it, for you are told that there is a quiet zone in the train. But you
are told this is only after the doors have closed; and when I asked the ticket
inspector how one reached the quiet zone, he said, ‘It’s at the other end of
the train. I wouldn’t advise
going, because we’re very busy.’
And so you are subjected to
the bright shining drivel of television whether you want it or not. In this
instance it was loud enough to make reading impossible, or to avoid being told
what the whether might be like in Northern Ireland tomorrow.
Television or other moving
pictures in public places, especially accompanied by sound, ought to be
recognised as a form of pollution. I would suggest a law to give permission to
anyone who wishes silence in a public space to smash any screen without
imputation if vandalism or criminal damage. Indeed, I would go further: I would
oblige any person or organisation that erected such a screen to provide the
public with the means – perhaps a little pick, placed nearby as fire
extinguishers are placed – to smash them, to be called forced-entertainment
extinguishers.
No comments:
Post a Comment