by Charles Hugh Smith
I know this is a
sacrilegious question, but is anybody else tired of buying and owning stuff? Is anybody else tired of
dealing with all the junk cluttering up every corner of the room/house/nation?
Has anyone else
noticed we have surplus stuff coming out our ears? And that therefore we don't
really need any more stuff? Has anyone noticed the psychological consequences
of constantly buying and managing possessions? Here is how correspondent B.D.
recently put it:
Kids have a melt-down when they don't have the latest iteration of the (insert trendy electronica here) or if they are asked to tidy up the gargantuan collection of "stuff" they are slowly suffocating themselves with. Most kids these days don't have bedrooms anymore ... they have a small warehouse of goods in which they have a sleeping space.
Everybody has a
warehouse of goods, even "poor" households. Of the four households on my
block with one-car garages, we're the only ones who actually park a car in the
garage. Everyone else's garage is jammed with stuff. And this is not an upscale
neighborhood, it's working-class/renters.
Have you been to
one of the many gigantic swap meets recently? You know, the kind with
hundreds of sellers hawking everything under the sun. Our young friends
(newlyweds renting one bedroom in a house, they don't own a car, both seeking
fulltime work but currently living on one-part time job) recently described
their visit to just such a sprawling cornucopia of over-consumption.
People are selling
any and everything to raise some cash: birds, snakes, used iPhones, laptop
computers, clothing, furniture, you name it. A guy was selling a guitar for
$15. Our friend offered $5. The seller took $8. $8 for an acoustic guitar.
Granted it was a cheap one, but $8? Was it even worth hauling it to the swap
meet for $8? A set of strings costs $4.
"Almost
new" bicycles--again, cheap, poor-quality versions--were being sold for
$35. You can't even buy a replacement bicycle wheel for $35.
Were these stolen
goods? Our friend asked the seller how he could sell bikes for so little money.
The seller replied that he buys the contents of abandoned storage lockers for a
few dollars and then sells the contents. (Apparently there is a reality TV show
based on this process of acquiring the contents of abandoned storage lockers.)
This raises an
interesting question: why bother stealing stuff when it is basically worthless? Smash-and-grab burglars are
only stealing electronics (and jewelry if it is laying around in plain sight).
Nothing else is worth stealing. Bicycle thieves abound, of course, but they're
picky as well: a rusty made-in-China bike with a cheap (and easily snipped)
cable lock will be left untouched; only the expensive bikes will be ripped off.
As I keep saying:
what's scarce is not stuff, it's cash and reliable income streams. People are
trying to convert stuff into cash, but it's tough because there is a surplus of
stuff.
No wonder
organizations that promote giving stuff away such as Freesharing.org are so
popular. People are
giving up trying to get any cash at all for old TVs, etc.; they are delighted
if someone hauls it away for free.
Is anyone else
sick of the "buying experience"? No wonder online buying has
become so ubiquitous--the experience of shopping to acquire stuff is a form of
torture, at least to some of us. Getting there is a nightmare (unless I can
bike to the store), parking is a hassle, clerks generally don't know much, and
the selection is often limited or skewed to the high end. The "fun"
is in leaving empty-handed.
I suppose other people
can't wait to get a new mobile phone; I live in dread that my old
"dumb" phone will expire and force me into buying another one. Ditto
for everything else we own.
There is so much
stuff floating around America that we end up with stuff we didn't buy or even
ask for--old laptops,
bicycles (abandoned on our property, left by neighbors moving away, left to us
by elderly neighbors who passed on, etc.) and clothing, to mention but a few of
of the things that we have "inherited."
I make a point to
be a "good citizen" by taking outdated printers, modems and other
electronics to the recycling yard; others aren't so civic-minded, as proven by
the piles of high-tech detritus that litter street corners and dumpsites around
the nation.
When the
university students leave town in May, dumpster after dumpster is filled with
broken Ikea furniture and old mattresses, many of recent vintage. It isn't
worth hauling any of it home. They will buy more future-landfill at Ikea when
they settle down somewhere else.
My new mantra is
"please don't give us anything we won't consume in a few days." What with all the insecurity
in the world, a lot of people have assembled stashes of precious metals. Quite
frankly, I don't want physical wealth I have to store, manage, protect, etc. I
am not at all sure I want any "wealth" at all other than the
"wealth" of productive land, a functioning infrastructure / civil
society, and the "wealth" of freedom of movement and choice.
I just want to get
rid of stuff, not acquire more. I welcome the digital age because
"entertainment" no longer requires physical collections. I have
already accepted that most digital stuff will be lost with time, just like
physical stuff. Who wants to lug around 50 years of digital files? Yes, it
might fit on a small drive, but who will sort through it all or even look at
it/listen to it?
The clutter of all
this stuff, physical and digital, clouds the mind and spirit. I think it was Sartre who
noted that our possessions own us, not the other way around. I am tired of being
possessed by possessions, of any kind or nature. I would be delighted if the
can of WD-40 in the toolshed lasts the rest of my life. If it doesn't, then I
will replace it, grudgingly.
More than likely,
I will find an almost-full can in somebody's trash, along with everything else
anyone could possibly want. The only thing missing from sorting through all
that's been abandoned is the drug-like "hit" of the purchase. Sadly
for a consumerist society, some of us are immune to that potent drug.
Many others will
suffer consumerist withdrawals as the cash and credit needed to complete the
purchase become increasingly scarce.
Marvelous sans the return to the land fantasy at the end.
ReplyDeleteThe technical repercussions of this essay of course involve the dematerialiazation of our economy so that we don't have to buy stuff.Unfortunately reliable income streams for the majority of the population require the manufacture of junk
I think that the point of the post is that current income streams are not sustainable (level of debt, quality of assets and col laterals etc), therefore, either way, almost everybody will have to make do with less stuff, which is not as painful as we think.
ReplyDelete