WHEN
Argentina proposed a brutal 65% haircut to holders of its defaulted sovereign
bonds in a 2005 restructuring, one argument the country’s officials used to
justify the offer was that the country could not take on more debt than it
could reasonably expect to pay. As painful as the loss might be, the argument
went, at least the new bonds the government would issue would be creditworthy.
Just seven years later, that
claim now looks harder to support. This month the impoverished northern
province of Chaco was unable to pay $263,000 of interest, after Argentina’s
Central Bank refused to sell it the necessary dollars. That forced the province
to announce it would compensate its creditors in pesos, converting the amount
owed at the official exchange rate, which is roughly 25% less than the
currency’s value on the black market. It was the first time an arm of the
Argentine government had failed to deliver a debt payment in full since the
country’s massive 2001 default.
Is Chaco's technical default a
canary in the coal mine for Argentine debt in general, or merely an isolated
nuisance? In the short run, most bondholders can stay calm. Although the Chaco
paper is denominated in dollars, it is governed by Argentine law, which allows
borrowers to settle their obligations in local currency. Ever since the Central
Bank clamped down on the foreign-exchange market last year in an effort to slow
capital flight, its official policy has been that local issuers can only buy
dollars to fund infrastructure projects.
But just $191m of provincial
debt is governed by local law and thus subject to this requirement. Only two
other provinces have Argentine-law bonds outstanding, and one of them, Tucumán,
has already reassured the public that it plans to continue meeting its
liabilities in dollars. The vast majority of provincial debt--around $7
billion--is subject to British or New York law. So far, those securities have
not been affected by Argentina's dollar shortage. The Central Bank has $45
billion in reserves, 14 times what the federal government owes to creditors in
2013.
That said, Argentina's
medium-term debt picture looks increasingly cloudy. Including provinces and
municipalities, the public sector is in deficit even before counting interest
payments. There is virtually no chance of retrenchment under the government of
Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, whose popularity depends on ever-greater public
spending. The overall public debt stock is still relatively low. But because
investors demand prohibitive interest rates to lend to a government seen as
unpredictable and anti-markets, Argentina cannot refinance its obligations as
they mature, and must pay the full principal out of tax revenues or
central-bank reserves. And although the economy is likely to recover modestly
next year after flatlining in 2012, it receives little private-sector
investment. That means there is little chance it will expand fast enough for
the government's revenues to outgrow its liabilities.
The bond markets are well
aware of all these warning signs. When the Chaco news broke, the federal
government's dollar-denominated bonds promptly sold off by 2%. Savvy investors
who recognise Argentina's capacity to pay for now but have doubts about its
trajectory might consider buying the country's debt that matures in the near
future while selling its longer-dated issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment