It is symptomatic of the national condition of
the United States that the worst humiliation ever suffered by it as a nation,
and by a US president personally, passed almost without comment last week. I
refer to the November 20 announcement at a summit meeting in Phnom Penh that 15
Asian nations, comprising half the world's population, would form a Regional
Comprehensive Economic Partnership excluding the United States.
President Barack Obama attended the summit to
sell a US-based Trans-Pacific Partnership excluding China. He didn't. The
American led-partnership became a party to which no-one came.
Instead, the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations, plus China, India, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand, will
form a club and leave out the United States. As 3 billion Asians become
prosperous, interest fades in the prospective contribution of 300 million
Americans - especially when those Americans decline to take risks on new
technologies. America's great economic strength, namely its capacity to
innovate, exists mainly in memory four years after the 2008 economic crisis.
A minor issue in the election campaign, the
Trans-Pacific Partnership initiative was the object of enormous hype on the
policy circuit. Salon.com enthused on October 23,
This agreement is a core part
of the "Asia pivot" that has occupied the activities of think tanks
and policymakers in Washington but remained hidden by the tinsel and confetti
of the election. But more than any other policy, the trends the TPP represents
could restructure American foreign relations, and potentially the economy
itself.
As it happened, this grand, game-changing vision
mattered only to the sad, strange people who concoct policy in the bowels of
the Obama administration. America's relative importance is fading.
To put these matters in context: the exports of
Asian countries have risen more than 20% from their peak before the 2008
economic crisis, while Europe's exports have fallen by more than 20%. American
exports have risen marginally (by about 4%) from their pre-2008 peak.
Exhibit 1: Asian, European and US exports
China's exports to Asia, meanwhile, have jumped 50% since their pre-crisis
peak, while exports to the United States have risen by about 15%. At US$90
billion, Chinese exports to Asia are three times the country's exports to the
United States.
After months and dire (and entirely wrong)
predictions that China's economy faces a hard landing, it is evident that China
will have no hard landing, nor indeed any landing at all. Domestic consumption
as well as exports to Asia are both running nearly 20% ahead of last year's
levels, compensating for weakness in certain export markets and the
construction sector. Exports to the moribund American economy are stagnant.
Exhibit 2: China's exports to Asia vs USA
Source: Bloomberg
In 2002, China imported five times as much from Asia as it did from the United
States. Now it imports 10 times as much from Asia as from the US.
Exhibit 3: Chinese imports from the US and Asia Source: Bloomberg
Following the trade patterns, Asian currencies began trading more closely with China's renminbi than with the American dollar. Arvind Subramanian and Martin Kessler wrote in an October 2012 study for the Peterson Institute:
Following the trade patterns, Asian currencies began trading more closely with China's renminbi than with the American dollar. Arvind Subramanian and Martin Kessler wrote in an October 2012 study for the Peterson Institute:
A country's rise to economic
dominance tends to be accompanied by its currency becoming a reference point,
with other currencies tracking it implicitly or explicitly. For a sample
comprising emerging market economies, we show that in the last two years, the
renminbi (RMB/yuan) has increasingly become a reference currency which we
define as one which exhibits a high degree of co-movement (CMC) with other
currencies.
In East Asia, there is already
a RMB bloc, because the RMB has become the dominant reference currency,
eclipsing the dollar, which is a historic development. In this region, 7
currencies out of 10 co-move more closely with the RMB than with the dollar,
with the average value of the CMC relative to the RMB being 40% greater than
that for the dollar. We find that co-movements with a reference currency,
especially for the RMB, are associated with trade integration.
We draw some lessons for the
prospects for the RMB bloc to move beyond Asia based on a comparison of the
RMB's situation today and that of the Japanese yen in the early 1990s. If trade
were the sole driver, a more global RMB bloc could emerge by the mid-2030s but
complementary reforms of the financial and external sector could considerably
expedite the process.
All of this is well known and
exhaustively discussed. The question is what, if anything, the United States
will do about it.
Where does the United States
have a competitive advantage? Apart from commercial aircraft, power-generating
equipment, and agriculture, it has few areas of real industrial pre-eminence.
Cheap natural gas helps low-value-added industries such as fertilizer, but the
US is lagging in the industrial space.
Four years ago, when Francesco
Sisci and I proposed a Sino-American monetary agreement as an anchor for trade
integration, the US still dominated the nuclear power plant industry. With the
sale of the Westinghouse nuclear power business to Toshiba, and Toshiba's joint
ventures with China to build power plants locally, that advantage has
evaporated.
The problem is that
Americans have stopped investing in the sort of high-tech, high-value-added
industries that produce the manufactures that Asia requires. Manufacturers'
capital goods orders are 38% below the 1999 peak after taking inflation into
account. And venture capital allocations for high-tech manufacturing have dried
up.
Source: National Venture Capital Association
Exhibit 5: US capital goods orders nearly 40% below 1999 peak in real terms
Exhibit 5: US capital goods orders nearly 40% below 1999 peak in real terms
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
- Without innovation and investment, all the trade agreements that the Washington policy circuit can devise won't help. Neither, it should be added, will an adjustment in exchange rates.
- Without innovation and investment, all the trade agreements that the Washington policy circuit can devise won't help. Neither, it should be added, will an adjustment in exchange rates.
- It is hard to fathom just what
President Obama had in mind when he arrived in Asia bearing a Trans-Pacific
Partnership designed to keep China out. What does the United States have to
offer Asians?
- It is borrowing $600 billion a
year from the rest of the world to finance a $1.2 trillion government debt,
most prominently from Japan (China has been a net seller of Treasury securities
during the past year).
· It is a taker of capital rather than a provider
of capital.
· It is a major import market but rapidly
diminishing in relative importance as intra-Asian trade expands far more
rapidly than trade with the United States.
·
And
America's strength as an innovator and incubator of entrepreneurs has
diminished drastically since the 2008 crisis, no thanks to the Obama
administration, which imposed a steep task on start-up businesses in the form
of its healthcare program.
Washington might want to pivot
towards Asia. At Phnom Penh, though, Asian leaders in effect invited Obama to
pivot the full 360 degrees and go home.
No comments:
Post a Comment