Workers protesting austerity on the
streets of southern Europe weren't to know it, but earlier this month there was
also a strike at the heart of the European Union - by bureaucrats fighting
possible cuts.
For an increasing number of Europeans, cuts in Brussels are what is needed.
The European capital has told member states to reduce spending, but as millions in Spain, Portugal and Greece feel the pain in pay, pensions, and social services, people are looking to the centre and finding what looks like fat.
For an increasing number of Europeans, cuts in Brussels are what is needed.
The European capital has told member states to reduce spending, but as millions in Spain, Portugal and Greece feel the pain in pay, pensions, and social services, people are looking to the centre and finding what looks like fat.
Britain
has led the way. Newspapers there have for decades carped at cosy 'eurocrats',
as they call Europe's civil servants. Prime Minister David Cameron need only
mention the EU and generous spending to produce a sea of nods and chants of
"hear, hear!" around parliament.
"We
can't have European spending going up and up and up when we're having to make
difficult decisions in so many different areas," Cameron told reporters at
the last summit of EU leaders in October, going on to express his frustration
at the salaries of civil servants in Brussels.
Now,
doubts are mounting in other member states. Such concerns have held up talks
over the EU's long-term budget, a financial program worth more than 1 trillion
euros ($1.3 trillion) over the next seven years. EU leaders hope to reach a
deal at a summit on November 22-23.
The
problem is that governments from Helsinki to Madrid are freezing spending or
cutting it by 5 percent or more a year, but the European Commission has asked
for a 6 percent increase over 2014-2020. An influential group of eight EU
countries, including Germany and France as well as Britain, wants the
Commission to save between 5 and 15 billion euros over the period.
The
Commission argues that it has already made cuts. But in politics, symbolism
matters, and numerous examples appear to contradict the claims of restraint:
- The European Parliament shifts its base once a month from Brussels to Strasbourg in France, at an annual cost of 180 million euros ($230 million).
- The European Council, which represents member states, is building a new ‘Europa' headquarters right next door to its existing marble-and-glass building, at a cost of 310 million euros.
- The European Court of Auditors, another EU institution, announced on November 6 that 4 percent of spending in the last EU budget had been "irregular", although this was largely due to mismanagement by member states.
- EU civil servants get generous health and pension benefits and free private education for their children in Brussels' leafy neighborhoods.
- EU institutions have cellars stocked with nearly 47,000 bottles of red, white and sparkling winewith a total value of 515,000 euros, according to a response to questions from German Member of the European Parliament Martin Ehrenhauser.
Cayo
Lara, the leader of Spain's left-wing Izquierda Unida party, puts it
succinctly: "While Brussels applauds, Spain bleeds," he said.
Until
the financial crisis hit, polls by EU opinion monitor Eurobarometer showed
Europeans liked the EU significantly more than their own governments. But the
latest, published in May, showed just 31 percent trusted the EU - the lowest
level ever, and just three points above trust in national governments.
"The
EU started out with the best of intentions," said Memnon Prokopiou, 76, a
retired lawyer, leaning on a walking stick in central Athens. "But its
leaders need to show more solidarity to the people of the south. There is huge
inequality in Europe and they are responsible for this."
PRE-EMPTIVE CUTS
Cameron
is under pressure at home, and finds a convenient and familiar scapegoat in
Brussels. Hitting out at EU spending casts him in a role played with success by
Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative predecessor who in 1984 famously won a rebate
after threatening to halt payments to the EU budget.
Britain,
Cameron said in October, had cracked down on central administration, "and
we need to see in the budget proposals that sort of rigorous approach."
The
bill for Brussels is not actually enormous. The entire cost of running the EU
and all its development, aid, research and subsidy programs amounts to only 1
percent of the bloc's gross domestic product. In most member states, government
spending takes up nearer 40-50 percent of GDP.
Administration
is just 6 percent of the EU budget, and there is evidence the Commission has
cut back. Officials say they began tightening their belts long before the
crisis. A fraud and cronyism scandal in 1999, which forced all the EU's
commissioners to resign, triggered a shake-up of how the institution and its
administration is run.
"Unlike
the member states, we didn't wait for a crisis," says Antony Gravilli, the
Commission's spokesman for administration and related costs.
From
2004, entry-level pay was lowered, officials had to contribute more to pensions
and tax, and automatic pay rises were capped. The Commission started to employ
contract staff who do not receive the EU's full benefits and now make up 20
percent of its 33,000-strong workforce.
The
changes triggered a decline in the purchasing power of EU officials, according
to figures provided by the Commission. Now it says it doesn't pay enough to
attract as many qualified staff from richer western European countries as it
needs. The Commission has proposed to peg its administrative costs to inflation
for five years, and aims to cut staff by 1 percent a year, saying this will
help save one billion euros by 2020.
Felix
Geradon, 53, a translator at the Council who helped lead the recent strike,
said EU institutions wouldn't be able to function properly after significant
cuts. He is planning another strike for Wednesday.
He
said politicians seeking EU budget cuts were mainly out to please domestic
political audiences, but top officials in Brussels could learn from ministers
in countries such as France who have taken pay cuts: "There could, or
should, be gestures from the top of our institutions."
THE
SALARY STUDY
Even
though the European Commission has cut administrative costs, a little-known
study carried out on its behalf suggests EU pay is still broadly better than
for officials in most member states.
The
study, prepared for the Commission by management consultants in 2009 but not
published before now, compared net pay and conditions in the Commission with
that of 26 other organizations, many of which declined to be named, but which
included NATO.
It
found EU officials in general did much better than all but the most senior
national civil servants, though they were less well paid than people in
international organizations. A married financial officer at the Commission is
paid between 45,000 euros and 105,000 euros, compared with between 18,000 euros
and just under 50,000 on average in a national civil service, the report said.
The
study did not include the salaries of contract staff at the Commission, and the
Commission said it did not publish the results because the consultants had not
unearthed enough comparative data.
Comparison
is complicated. Changes in EU civil servants' pay are dictated by a formula
based on what public officials in member states earn. The EU pay moves in line
with the average, but lags by a year. That meant EU staffers were due a raise
last year, just as some national officials were suffering cuts. Britain, France
and Germany have refused to grant the
formula-based increases. The Commission has taken them to the EU's top court,
the European Court of Justice. The case is pending.
"In
politics you need visible gestures, and there should be some more of
these," said Stephan Keukeleire, a professor of politics at the University
of Leuven who is a specialist in European policy.
OBRIGADO
Cyprus
holds the rotating presidency of the EU. It has proposed cutting at least 50
billion euros from the next long-term budget by reducing administrative costs.
There appears to be broad agreement among member states that this will be the
deal hammered out later this week.
In
May, Open Europe, a London-based think-tank which is skeptical of Brussels,
suggested cuts to reduce the total EU budget by 30 percent. These would come
partly in development and agricultural subsidies that it says are ineffective,
and partly from scrapping projects it believes are not needed.
One
of these, the Committee of the Regions, has an 80 million euro budget to
provide a voice for sub-national authorities from places such as Catalonia.
Another
project the think-tank would scrap is the House of European History, a museum
being built in Brussels on the initiative of the European Parliament. It will
feature exhibits on postwar history and is scheduled for completion in 2015 at
a cost of more than 50 million euros.
"The
EU operates in a sort of bubble," says Open Europe researcher Pawel
Swidlicki. "There's less accountability to the public." Nations with
directly elected governments can pressure governments to rethink costly
schemes, he says.
Probably
Europe's most bizarre set-up is the 500-million euro parliament building in
Strasbourg. The parliament's 754 members meet 12 times a year there, even
though they also have a complex in Brussels.
Each
time the parliament moves to Strasbourg, more than 5,000 people travel the 350
km (217 miles) from Brussels, many of them in two specially laid-on high-speed
trains or on charter flights. A lorry picks up a trunk of documents from each lawmaker's
Brussels office on Friday evening and delivers it to his or her office in
Strasbourg's gleaming, glass parliament by Monday morning.
The
arrangement drives many parliamentarians nuts.
"I've
yet to go to a meeting in my constituency where someone doesn't say, ‘Why on
earth do you still go to Strasbourg and Brussels?'" says Edward
McMillan-Scott, the British leader of a campaign to abolish the Strasbourg
seat. He commissioned a 2011 study that put its total cost at 180 million euros
a year.
But
the system is written into the EU's treaties.
This
year, parliament cut back one trip. France said that was against EU treaties,
and Paris took the parliament to the European Court of Justice. A preliminary
opinion sided with the French, and a final judgment is expected in the next few
weeks.
Not
everyone is complaining. At Strasbourg's Chez Yvonne, a restaurant, the takings
go up 30 percent when parliament comes to town.
The
president of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, who is a former
prime minister of Portugal, is a regular, according to manager Julien de
Valmigere. He produces a hand-written note from Barroso.
"Obrigado!"
it reads - Portuguese for thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment