Last week, the German Parliament passed a resolution that asked Chancellor
Angela Merkel to needle Russian President Vladimir Putin about the resurgence
of repressive, antidemocratic tendencies in Russia. It did not go unnoticed at
the Kremlin. And it paved the way, so to speak, for her trip to Moscow on
Friday—to re-cement their “strategic partnership.”
Complaints about the resolution filtered back to the point where Foreign
Minister Guido Westerwelle, just before departing for Moscow, warned his
countrymen not to overdo their criticism of Russia. It’s in the interests of
Germany, he mused, to expand the “strategic partnership”; Russia was needed as
a geopolitical and economic partner.
Indeed. Merkel arrived in Moscow with her entourage that included eight ministers
and corporate chieftains by the planeload—she doesn’t leave home without them.
With Merkel and Putin looking on, these chieftains and their Russian
counterparts signed contracts for billions of euros, a ritual that German
chancellors have to perform when abroad. It’s part of Germany’s mercantilist
foreign policy. Siemens CEO Peter Löscher bagged perhaps the biggest deal, a
declaration of intent to deliver 695 electric locomotives for €2.5 billion
($3.2 billion) to Russian Railways (RZD), an elephantine state-owned company
with 950,000 employees.
That’s what really mattered. Criticism of Russia—carefully calibrated and
range-bound—would be for consumption at home, where anti-Russian sentiment has
been rising. With elections coming up next year, Merkel, the consummate
political animal, is treading a fine line: deliver a bland rebuke that would
barely satisfy voters in Germany and help arrange deals that would fully
satisfy German industry.
The initial meeting was at the concluding session of the annual Petersburg Dialogue, a four-day
forum, this year titled ominously, “Russia and Germany: the Information Society
Facing the Challenges of the 21st Century.” So the first question from the
audience was posed by a Russian participant: what about the recent
deterioration in the Russian-German relationship—a reference to the
resolution—and its consequences on economic cooperation?
A government had to be able to digest criticism, Merkel said in response.
Yes, some of the recent laws the State Duma had passed “irritated” her. “I
cannot see that they further freedom,” she said. “We ask
ourselves if that is good for the development of Russian society or not.” But
that didn’t change the intense relationship between both countries. “If I were
offended every time I opened the paper at home, I couldn’t be chancellor for
three days,” she said. Putin smiled.
It kicked off a bizarre tangle of questions and answers, comments, attacks,
and counterattacks, fact-based or not, that carried over into a panel
discussion and press conference. Putin claimed that Germany had been criticized
by human rights groups because some of its states didn’t have laws for the
protection of information. Which baffled attendees. And about Merkel’s
statement—incomprehensible, given current conditions—that Europe always tried
to speak with one voice, Putin retorted: “That’s called a cartel.” Even the Pussy Riot case came up.
A representative from Gazprom, the giant state-owned Russian natural gas
company without which no German-Russian meeting is complete, and on which
Germany depends for much of its natural gas, complained about the “gloomy
atmosphere” in the relations between both countries that was hindering making
deals.
The meeting was a far cry from when Gerhard Schröder was still Chancellor.
He’d raised the “strategic partnership” to new heights through his close
personal and political relationship with Putin. For example in November 2004,
he described Putin as a “flawless democrat,” which stirred up a ruckus even in
Germany. He also championed the Nord Stream gas pipeline that would pump gas
from Russia directly to Germany via the Baltic Sea, without crossing other countries,
a very costly project. Gazprom controlled the Nord Stream consortium. A deal
was signed in October 2005. It included a loan guarantee by the German
government of €1 billion. That’s how close German-Russians relations were.
On November 22, 2005, Schröder got kicked out of office. Days later,
Gazprom appointed him Chairman of Nord Stream AG, causing another ruckus in
Germany; it was clear what his intentions had been all along, now that he was
on the lavish payroll of the Russian government. Turns out, the Baltic pipeline
would allow Russia to cut off gas to countries its other pipelines crossed on
their way to Germany, while still supplying Germany—a powerful political weapon
against those countries. The “strategic partnership” had made it possible.
Gazprom is deeply involved in the rest of Europe as well. For example, why
would France suddenly prohibit shale gas exploration? Sure,
there are environmental issues. But French governments have had, let’s say, an
uneasy relationship with environmentalists. Its spy service DGSE, sank
Greenpeace’s flagship, the Rainbow Warrior, killing one person. No,
there must have been another reason. Read... Russia’s Gazprom
Tightens Its Stranglehold On Europe: The Natural Gas War Gets Dirty.
With the euro debt crisis came absurdities. Now the currency is creating
artificial problems between peoples. And by being “irreversible,” as ECB
President Mario Draghi had said, it has become a curse—and a religious dictum
that must not be questioned regardless of how much havoc it may ultimately
wreak. Read... The Curse Of The “Irreversible” Euro.
No comments:
Post a Comment