As Beijing rejiggers its economic strategy and lets its currency weaken, Japan is likely about to become to the top foreign holder of U.S. Treasuries. What does this mean?
by Daniel Gross
You hear it all of
the time. The problem is that the government is borrowing from China to fund
our stupid spending programs, or popular subsidies, or tax cuts. Mitt Romney
(remember him?), in a presidential debate, defined his criterion for deciding
whether spending is worthwhile thusly: “Is the program so critical it’s worth borrowing
from China to pay for it?” Big Bird famously didn’t meet that test. In the
vice-presidential debate, Paul Ryan criticized subsidies for electric cars, and wondered“Was it a good idea to borrow all this money from
countries like China and spend it on all these various different interest
groups?” Democrats do it, too. Pollster Mark Mellman, writing
in The Hill, described how he
used the “borrowing from China” line in a recent poll.
Subtle, this isn’t. Politicians of all stripes warn
that it’s a bad idea for Americans to borrow from a rival, a potential enemy, a
country with a fundamentally different and authoritarian political system.
Relying on China as a lender will reduce our freedom of movement, harm our
values, and diminish the country. And in recent years, our massive trade
deficit has led to ever-increasing Chinese purchases of U.S. government debt.
For much of the past two decades, China’s central bank has hoovered up all the dollars
we sent to purchase plastic stuff and clothes, and then used it to buy
dollar-denominated assets, the better to keep its currency weak against the
dollar. A year ago, China was far and away the largest foreign owner of U.S.
debt; it sat on a $1.27 trillion stockpile.
But the global economy is a dynamic place. Things
change. And today, it’s highly likely that the biggest foreign holder of U.S.
debt isn’t the snarling Asian tiger of China. Rather, it’s the wounded,
unthreatening kitty cat of Japan.
That’s right,
Japan. Twenty years ago, Japan occupied the place that China now does in our
commercial imagination—the aggressive, swashbuckling, mercantilist power from
the east that was bent on global economic domination. But the past two decades
haven’t been kind to Japan. Hampered by low growth, demographic decline, a
constipated political system, a scarcity of energy resources, a massive debt
overhang, and a crippling 2011 tsunami, Japan has become the sick man of Asia.
The country still remains wealthy, and has a high savings rate. And its central
bank and private investors always had a huge portfolio of U.S. government
bonds.
In September 2011,
China held $1.27 trillion in Treasury securities, or 26 percent of the total
owned by foreigners, while Japan held $984 billion, or about 20 percent. But
something has happened in the past year. China’s export growth has
slowed, and the country
is trying to move toward a consumption-driven economy. At the same time,
China’s central bank has let its currency decline
in value against the dollar. Between September 2011 and September 2012, in fact, its U.S. debt
holdings shrank to $1.155 trillion, down nearly 11 percent. (For a deeper
historical dive, go here.)
Meanwhile, Japan’s
holdings have risen. Investors seek relative value. And while American bonds
may not pay much interest, they pay more than bonds issued by Tokyo. One man’s
low-yielding bond is another man’s high-yielding bond. But there are also
mercantilist motives at work. “Japan has done some intervention to keep the yen
from appreciating against the dollar,” said Ted Truman, senior fellow at the
Peterson Institute for International Economics, in Washington, D.C. In addition,
Japan may have bought U.S. bonds as a way of diversifying away from the
troubled euro. And so between September 2011 and September 2012, Japan’s
holdings of Treasury securities rose to $1.13 trillion, up $146 billion, or 15
percent.
For all those who
say the U.S. doesn’t make anything the world wants, look no further than the
Treasury’s monthly statement of the public debt.
That data is from
the end of September, nearly two months ago. The next reading, for October,
will come out in the middle of this month. If the trends of the past year have
continued, and China’s holdings have fallen or been flat in the past two months
while Japan’s holdings have risen, it’s highly likely that Japan has already
displaced China as America’s chief international lender.
Over the past few
years, our dependence on China as a lender has declined in both absolute terms
and in relative terms. For all those who say the U.S. doesn’t make anything the
world wants, look no further than the Treasury’s monthly statement of the
public debt, which can be seen here (PDF). We manufacture government debt. And the world buys
it. In the recently concluded fiscal year, the deficit was about $1.1 trillion.
Between September 2011 and September 2012, the grand total of marketable debt
held by foreigners rose from $4.9 trillion to $5.455 trillion, or about $555
billion.
So, yes, the
amount of debt owned by foreigners has risen in the past year. But the portion
of the debt owned by foreigners has stayed about the same—at about 51
percent—and the portion owned by China has fallen sharply. China’s total
holdings of U.S. debt are about where they were in the middle of 2010, when the
volume of total U.S. debt was much smaller.
So, the more
accurate anti-spending, anti-borrowing rhetorical trope should be: “We’re
borrowing from ourselves to fund the government, plus more than we used to from
Japan and somewhat less than we used to from China.” But I doubt that tests well with focus groups.
No comments:
Post a Comment