The evidence is that Hitler has plenty of admirers in India
By Dilip D’ Souza
Hated and mocked in much of the world, the Nazi leader has developed a
strange following among schoolchildren and readers of Mein Kampf in India. Dilip D’Souza on how
political leader Bal Thackeray influenced Indians to admire Hitler and despise
Gandhi.
My
wife teaches French to tenth-grade students at a private school here in Mumbai.
During one recent class, she asked these mostly upper-middle-class kids to
complete the sentence “J'admire …” with the name of the historical figure they
most admired.
To
say she was disturbed by the results would be to understate her reaction. Of 25
students in the class, 9 picked Adolf Hitler, making him easily the highest
vote-getter in this particular exercise; a certain Mohandas Gandhi was the choice
of precisely one student. Discussing the idea of courage with other students
once, my wife was startled by the contempt they had for Gandhi. “He was a
coward!” they said. And as far back as 2002, the Times of India reported a
survey that found that 17 percent of students in elite Indian colleges “favored
Adolf Hitler as the kind of leader India ought to have.”
In
a place where Gandhi becomes a coward, perhaps Hitler becomes a hero.
Still, why Hitler?
“He was a fantastic orator,” said the 10th-grade kids. “He loved his country;
he was a great patriot. He gave back to Germany a sense of pride they had lost
after the Treaty of Versailles,” they said.
"And what
about the millions he murdered?” asked my wife. “Oh, yes, that was bad,” said
the kids. “But you know what, some of them were traitors.”
Admiring Hitler for
his oratorical skills? Surreal enough. Add to that the easy condemnation of his
millions of victims as traitors. Add to that the characterization of this man
as a patriot. I mean, in a short dozen years, Hitler led Germany through a
scarcely believable orgy of blood to utter shame and wholesale destruction.
Even the mere thought of calling such a man a patriot profoundly corrupts—is
violently antithetical to—the idea of patriotism.
But these are kids,
you think, and kids say the darndest things. Except this is no easily
written-off experience. The evidence is that Hitler has plenty of admirers in
India, plenty of whom are by no means kids.
Consider Mein Kampf, Hitler’s
autobiography. Reviled it might be in the much of the world, but Indians buy
thousands of copies of it every month. As a recent paper in the journal EPW tells us (PDF),
there are over a dozen Indian publishers who have editions of the book on the
market. Jaico, for example, printed its 55th edition in 2010, claiming to have
sold 100,000 copies in the previous seven years. (Contrast this to the 3,000
copies my own 2009 book,Roadrunner, has sold). In a country where 10,000
copies sold makes a book a bestseller, these are significant numbers.
And the approval
goes beyond just sales. Mein Kampf is available for sale on
flipkart.com, India’s Amazon. As I write this, 51 customers have rated the
book; 35 of those gave it a five-star rating. What’s more, there’s a steady
trickle of reports that say it has become a must-read for business-school students; a management guide much like Spencer Johnson’s Who Moved My Cheese or Edward de Bono’s Lateral Thinking. If
this undistinguished artist could take an entire country with him, I imagine
the reasoning goes, surely his book has some lessons for future captains of
industry?
Much of Hitler’s
Indian afterlife is the legacy of Bal Thackeray, chief of the Shiv Sena party
who died on Nov. 17.
Thackeray freely,
openly, and often admitted his admiration for Hitler, his book, the Nazis, and
their methods. In 1993, for example, he gave an interview toTime magazine.
“There is nothing wrong,” he said then, “if [Indian] Muslims are treated as
Jews were in Nazi Germany.”
This interview came only months after the December 1992 and January 1993
riots in Mumbai, which left about a thousand Indians slaughtered, the majority
of them Muslim. Thackeray was active right through those weeks, writing
editorial after editorial in his party mouthpiece, “Saamna” (“Confrontation”)
about how to “treat” Muslims.
On Dec. 9, 1992,
for example, his editorial contained these lines: “Pakistan need not cross the
borders and attack India. 250 million Muslims in India will stage an armed
insurrection. They form one of Pakistan’s seven atomic bombs.”
A month later, on
Jan. 8, 1993, there was this: “Muslims of Bhendi Bazar, Null Bazar, Dongri and
Pydhonie, the areas [of Mumbai] we call Mini Pakistan … must be shot on the
spot.”
No comments:
Post a Comment