By MARIO LOYOLA
For
decades, Democrats and Republicans alike have invested heavily in governance
schemes that erode the Constitution’s separation of powers and mar its proper
functioning. The Federal judiciary has uniformly rubber-stamped these schemes.
The consequence has been an unsustainable spree of borrowing, spending and
overregulation at the Federal level, cyclical fiscal crises at the state level,
and less accountable and less representative government at every level.
These governance schemes are generally of two
kinds: one erodes the separation of powers between Federal and state
governments, while the other erodes the separation of powers within the Federal
government. In the first category is “cooperative federalism”, whereby the
Federal government uses monopoly powers to coerce and subvert the prerogatives
of state governments. In the other is Congress’s delegation of vast rule-making
authority to administrative agencies.
These two categories of concern are often
treated as being entirely distinct, but they share profound similarities. Both
are methods for Congress to escape accountability by hiding its power in other
institutions of government. Cooperative federalism allows Congress to hide its
power within the decision-making of state governments, while its delegation of
rule-making authority allows it to hide its power in the far-flung bureaucracy
of the Executive Branch.
The Federal judiciary has a crucial role to play
in maintaining and policing the boundaries of America’s basic institutions of
state. It is a role it abdicated when confronted with the popular nationalist
programs of the New Deal. The constitutional doctrines the judiciary has
invoked to let Congress blur these critical separations of power are deeply
flawed as a matter of constitutional law, and they have ultimately become
unsustainable as a matter of political economy. Federal courts must begin to
enforce a strict separation of powers, both between the Federal and state
governments and within the Federal government itself. And Congress itself must
start undoing the consequences of its own self-indulgence.
No comments:
Post a Comment