By John Phelan
When the European Union (with German money) mounted its most recent
bailout of Greece, one of the conditions was a 75 percent write down of Greek
government debt. For the Cypriot banks, which had made loans to the Greek
government totalling 160 percent of Cyprus’s GDP, this was disastrous.
With
their capital bases smashed the Cypriot government felt obliged to bail them
out. Lacking the funds to do so (in 2011 the IMF reported that the assets of
Cypriot banks totalled 835 percent of GDP) it turned to the European Union (in
reality Germany again) for a bailout.
The
Germans are reluctant to lend money without conditions. If the terms of the
bailout are accepted by the Cypriot parliament, in return for the €10 billion
corporation tax will rise from 10 percent to 12.5 percent and interest on bank
deposits will be subject to a withholding tax.
But
the most controversial aspect is the proposal that bank deposits will be
subject to a one off “solidarity levy”, amounts under €100,000 at a rate of
6.75 percent and those over €100,000 at 9.9 percent.
This
is the eurozone crisis at its most extreme but it only differs from events in
Ireland, Greece, Spain, Italy, and Portugal, by degree. And in as far as
government eventually has to tailor its outgoings to suit its income it is
really just an extreme version of the situation which will also eventually face
Japan, Britain, and the US, probably in that order.
The
first concerns the relationship between banks and our politicians. Over the
last few years politicians elected to represent the people have rarely missed
an opportunity to dump debts on those people in the interests of saving banks
and other financial institutions which have hit trouble. We have been told that
banks occupy a unique position in our economy such that the laws of economics
don’t apply to them as they apply to Woolworths or Blockbuster. They are too
vital, we are told, too big to fail.
Functioning
banks certainly are a key part of a modern financial system but why should the
same be said of the toxic zombies who are blundering round the current
financial landscape?
And
how did these rotten banks get so big in the first place? It’s because
governments and central banks prop them up. Bad banks rarely go out of
business, they just lumber on, soaking up and destroying more wealth. Goldman
Sachs and JP Morgan were bailed out five times in the 20 years before 2008.
The
second lesson is that there really is no such thing as private property. In
extremis the government considers itself entitled to any amount of your
property it desires even if, as in the Cypriot case, it means revoking its own
commitments to protect bank deposits.
But
then this is the logical outcome of taxation. If you think that a shortage of
government revenue can be solved by the government simply helping itself to
someone else’s revenue you really can’t have a philosophical problem with this.
If you believe in the 50p tax rate this is where you end up.
The
third lesson is the limits of democracy. The Cypriot Prime Minister, Nicos
Anastasiades, ran at the last election on a promise to protect depositors. Now
he stands behind a lectern explaining why he cannot protect depositors. The
greater a country's debts the fewer are its options and in the euro, with no
possibility of devaluation, this problem is exacerbated.
The
Cypriots will probably feel much as the Irish or Portuguese did to have their
economic policy decided by the Troika of the EU, the International Monetary
Fund, and the European Central Bank. They may feel a touch like the Spanish or
French did when they elected an anti-austerity candidate only to find that they
get some measure of austerity anyway. They may end up feeling like the Greeks
or Italians who skipped these intermediary steps and went straight to having
their governments foisted upon them by the European Union.
This
isn’t just a lesson for eurozone members. Labour currently lead in British
opinion polls, appealing to soft-headed types who think that we can back to the
big spending and even bigger borrowing days of Gordon Brown if only we tick the
right box on a ballot slip. In the United States Barack Obama won re-election
last year on the promise that the Chinese will continue to lend the US the
money to live it up.
British
and American voters might not have been slapped in the face with reality in the
same way as the bottom half of the eurozone has thanks to their ability to
trash their currencies, but it will come. Sooner or later they will be faced
with the fact that a country cannot indefinitely live beyond its means and that
voting for snake oil salesmen who tell you there is, is a sure fire recipe for
disappointment.
The
final lesson though, and perhaps the scariest, is that those in charge are no
smarter than the average bloke in the street. It is difficult to find the words
for the stupidity of trying to shore up Cypriot banks with a policy which will
cause a run on those very same banks.
Cyprus
offers a grim glimpse of a possible future for the wider western world:
politicians who will sacrifice the people for banks, the expropriation of
private property to pay for it, the diminishing options offered by the
political process, and idiots in charge. Let’s hope they aren’t coming to a
crisis near you.
No comments:
Post a Comment