By Brian
Westenhaus
Transatomic,
a Massachusetts Institute of Technology spinoff is developing a nuclear reactor designed to overcome the major
barriers to nuclear power. For the anti-nuclear folks the design offers
to burn up the existing spent fuel from the world’s fleet of nuclear reactors
in a design that doesn’t offer a chance for a meltdown. That should be
nirvana for those alarmed about atomic energy and weapons proliferation.
For
everyone else, the first offering is we would see a reduction in spent fuel
containment costs and get electrical energy, lots of it, instead. The
second is the design would be factory produced cutting build costs in a huge
way and the reactors would be larger than the currently trendy Small Modular
Nuclear Reactors (SMNRs) offering the chance to install at existing locations
saving on the generation and grid connection costs.
Transatomic, founded by a pair of very smart and innovative young
nuclear engineers, has updated the molten-salt reactor, a reactor type that’s highly
resistant to meltdowns. Molten-salt reactors were demonstrated in the 1960s at
Oak Ridge National Lab, where one test reactor ran for six years. What
remains is raising $5 million to run five experiments to help validate the new
basic design.
Russ
Wilcox, Transatomic’s new CEO estimates that it will take eight years to build
a prototype reactor at a cost of $200 million. The company has already
raised $1 million in seed funding, including some from Ray Rothrock, a partner
at the venture capital firm Venrock.
The
cofounders, Mark Massie and Leslie Dewan, who we met here in April last year, are still PhD candidates at MIT. Yet the
design has attracted some top advisors, including Regis Matzie, the former CTO
of the major nuclear power plant supplier Westinghouse Electric, and Richard
Lester, the head of the nuclear engineering department at MIT.
The
new reactor design called the Waste-Annihilating Molten Salt Reactor (WAMSR) so
far exists only on paper. Ray Rothrock says the company will face many
challenges. “The technology doesn’t bother me in the least,” he said. “I have
confidence in the people. I wish someone would build this thing, because I
think it would work. It’s all the other factors that make it daunting.”
We’ll get to those daunting factors in a moment.
Background
– today’s conventional nuclear power plant is cooled by water, which boils at
100º C a temperature far below the 2,000° C at the core of a fuel pellet. Even
after the reactor is shut down, it must be continuously cooled by pumping in
water until the whole internal core apparatus is below 100º C. The
inability to do that properly is what has caused the problems at troubled
plants. Oddly, the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies haven’t come
to realize the notion of mixing water and nuclear fuel is the dangerous matter.
The big
problems can be solved by using molten salt, instead of water as the coolant,
which is mixed in with the fuel. Molten salt has a boiling point higher than
the operating temperature of the fuel. That way the reactor has a built-in
thermostat – if it starts to heat up, the salt expands, spreading out the fuel
and slowing the reactions cooling the thing off.
In the
event of a power outage where cooling circulation would stop carrying away the
heat, a plug at the bottom of the reactor melts and the fuel and salt mixture
flows by gravity into a holding tank, where the fuel spreads out enough for the
reactions to stop. The salt then cools and solidifies, encapsulating the
radioactive materials.
Ms
Dewan now the company’s chief science officer says, “It’s walk-away safe, if
you lose electricity, even if there are no operators on site to pull levers, it
will coast to a stop.”
She
needs only $5 million to prove it.
Technology
– Transatomic’s design improves on the original molten-salt reactor by changing
the internal geometry and using different materials. Transatomic is keeping
many of the proprietary design details to itself, but one change involves
eliminating the graphite that made up 90% of the volume of the Oak Ridge
reactor. The company has also modified conditions in the reactor to produce
faster neutrons, which makes it possible to burn most of the material that is
ordinarily discarded as waste.
The
design offers a couple other real strong incentives. Because it runs at
atmospheric pressure rather than the high pressures required in conventional
reactors the amount of steel and concrete needed to guard against accidents is
greatly reduced. The technical approach will work for
uranium or for the future thorium fuels as well.
Here is
the comparison that should light up the hearts of the antinuclear crowd.
A conventional 1,000-megawatt reactor produces about 20 metric tons (44,000
lbs.) of high-level waste a year, and that material needs to be safely stored
for 100,000 years. The 500-megawatt Transatomic reactor will produce only four
kilograms (8.8 lbs.) of such waste a year, along with 250 kilograms (550 lbs.)
of waste that has to be stored for a few hundred years.
In the
presentation the duo projects some warming numbers for both the low cost power
and the anti nuclear folks. Conventional nuclear reactors can utilize
only about 3% of the potential fission energy in a given amount of uranium
before it has to be removed from the reactor. The Transatomic design captures
98% of this remaining energy. A fully deployed Transatomic reactor fleet
could use existing stockpiles of nuclear waste to satisfy the world’s
electricity needs for 70 years, now through 2083 when about 99.2% of today’s
dangerous spent fuel – would be burned away.
Even
though the basic idea of a molten-salt reactor has been demonstrated the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) certification process is set up around
light-water reactors. NRC spokesman Scott Burnell said for the next few
years, the NRC will be focused on certifying the more conventional designs for
SMNRs. But he also said that the commission is aware of Transatomic’s
concept but that designs haven’t been submitted for review yet. The
certification process for Transatomic will take at least five years once the
company submits a detailed design, with additional review needed specifically
for issues related to fuel and waste management.
The
detailed design is years and $4 million more dollars away. Wilcox
estimated that it will take eight years to build a prototype reactor – at a
cost of $200 million. Low cost power customers and the antinuclear folks
might want to coordinate getting the Congress to rewrite the NRC’s procedures
to speed things up.
After
all, China is reported to be investing $350 million over five years to develop
molten-salt reactors of its own. It plans to build a two-megawatt test reactor
by 2020.
It’d be
a pity to miss out on a trillion dollar industrial market and trillions more in
electricity savings. Plus get rid of all that weapons ready, costly to
store used fuel.
No comments:
Post a Comment