A lot of attention
is being paid to culture. We read about clashes of culture and culture wars.
Concerning the Atlanta scandal of 35 educators indicted for inflating the test
scores of their students, former Reagan budget director David Stockman on ABC's This
Week said: "Cheating
is symptomatic of a huge cultural problem we have. "Upon the death of
Margaret Thatcher, Times columnist David Brooks wrote that she
"was formed by her disgust with 1970s Britain," which she saw as a
"moral shift... away from the culture of rectitude and toward the culture
of narcissism."Something is wrong with the culture. But what exactly is
culture?
The subtitle of
David Mamet's The Secret Knowledge (2011) is: "On the
Dismantling of American Culture." (Go to his website to read the first
chapter or to order.) Mr. Mamet contends that "culture predates
society." In Chapter 3 he writes:
The Culture, of a
country, a family, a religion, a region, is a compendium of these unwritten
laws worked out over time through the preconscious adaptations of its members
--- through trial and error. It is, in its totality, "the way we do things
here." It is born of the necessity of humans getting along. It does not
come into being because of the inspiration, nor because of the guidance, of any
individual or group, but it evolves naturally: those things which work are
adopted, those which do not, discarded.
Mr. Mamet is
writing about something deeper and more basic than what many think of as culture.
In "Is the Nation-State Leaking Culture?" at Cato's Domain,
Michael Booth writes:
Yet I contend the most fundamental of all the elements combining to create and sustain the nation-state is culture. It's culture that holds and focuses all of the others. [...] Culture is explosive. It's divisive. It's not contained by the nation-state but is a crucial glue binding the nation-state. When infused with historical grudges or religious "jihad" ... or even just a peaceful awakening sense of individualism and a desire for local control ... culture becomes a weapon with the power to shatter both the nation-state and the welfare state governments that ride along upon it.
Some nations are
rather proprietary about their culture. France, for instance, has bemoaned the
Americanization of its culture, (even while French suburbs fill up with Muslim
émigrés who hate France and have no intention of being assimilated). American
minorities speak of their own culture, as do American youth. (When young
American barbarians are told they have their own culture, they're apt to
express themselves with tattoos and nose rings.)
When some think of
culture, they may well think of something along the lines of Matthew Arnold's
Culture and Anarchy: "the best which has been thought and said." That
is, literature, art, architecture; i.e., high culture. While high culture may be
what pops to mind when we consider other nations, low culture and pop culture
are what a nation is steeped in. Rock & roll and rap play a bigger role in
our culture than do the symphonies of Leonard Bernstein; we care more about
sports than what's showing at art galleries. Mamet and Booth are closer to what
the culture is than is Arnold.
Culture is all
about standards. But wherever we look we see the erosion of standards. It is no
wonder that an America that tolerates the intolerable would see the rise of a
culture of corruption. Bad public policy has contributed to America's breakdown
in standards. Government has cultivated a culture of dependency. We see an
ever-growing coarseness and crassness in our culture. Much of what divides
America may simply be attributable to a loss of manners. As Sheriff Bell
remarks in No Country for Old Men, "once you quit hearing
'sir' and 'ma'am,' the rest is soon to foller."
Progressives have
never understood culture. Progressives think culture can be dictated from on
high. They think people from radically different cultures can be thrown
together and all will be sweetness and light. They cleave to the bankrupt
ideologies of cultural relativism and multiculturalism. These ideologies have
fostered doubt in our own culture, but we are not to judge other cultures and
peoples, however barbaric.
Culture is the
dominant practices and values of a people. Culture defines a people.
Palestinians strap bombs onto their women and children and direct them to
detonate in crowds of people they hate. The world is supposed to "understand"
this and to respect their "culture." After all, aren't all cultures
equal? At least, that's what progressives would have us believe.
A civilization can
consist of several cultures, and those cultures can differ. In the 1940s the
cultures of England and Germany were quite different. But both nations were
part of Western Civilization. Even a nation with a culture as sophisticated as
Germany's can fall into barbarism when it's been beaten down and a charismatic
leader comes along.
John
Frankenheimer's excellent The Train (1964) concerns an
obsessed Nazi colonel who attempts to take a treasure trove of French paintings
back to Germany by rail. It is the final days of the German occupation of Paris
during World War II. A group of French railway men try to thwart the colonel's
theft through sabotage. But when it looks like the colonel will succeed in his
theft, a railway inspector, Labiche, singlehandedly derails the train before it
leaves French territory. The colonel is furious; he tries to commandeer the
trucks of a passing German convoy. He orders the paintings to be transferred
from the train to the trucks, but is met with resistance. The officer in
command of the convoy informs the colonel that a French armored division is
just over the hill; "in this sector the war is over." The colonel tells
his soldiers to go on without him. As they are leaving, French hostages are
mowed down by machine gun. After the retreating Wehrmacht has moved out, amid
the massacred Frenchmen and crates of priceless art, the colonel comes face to
face with his nemesis:
Labiche! Here's
your prize, Labiche. Some of the greatest paintings in the world. Does it
please you, Labiche? Give you a sense of excitement in just being near them? A
painting means as much to you as a string of pearls to an ape. You won by sheer
luck: you stopped me without knowing what you were doing, or why. You are
nothing, Labiche -- a lump of flesh. The paintings are mine; they always will
be; beauty belongs to the man who can appreciate it! They will always belong to
me or to a man like me. Now, this minute, you couldn't tell me why you did what
you did.
Labiche looks back
for a moment at his slain countrymen and then eloquently answers the colonel's
accusations. We then see the crates of French masterworks upon which are
stenciled the names of Braque, Renoir, Degas, Cezanne, Dufy, and Lautrec.
Interspersed between the shots of the crates, we see the faces of the slain
Frenchmen. And then we see Labiche limping back to town, and the movie ends.
Labiche and his
fellow saboteurs seemed to be ordinary Frenchmen and probably not connoisseurs
of high art. Perhaps the reason they did what they did is because they dimly
sensed that they must do something to save their heritage, their...culture.
When the
"crucial glue" of culture no longer holds, anarchy ensues. But what
started the collapse of culture is the collapse of people. What's falling apart
is people. It is people that were debased first, and now they're dragging their
culture down with them.
The barbarians at
the gate are us. We're vandalizing our children's future and robbing them of
their birthright. We are the barbarians we've been waiting for.
NOTE: I found this YouTube clip of the final scene
from The Train for you cineastes. But, if you haven't seen the
entire flick and screening just the final scene seems, oh, rather barbaric to
you, then watch the whole thing for free. You will
of course recognize Burt Lancaster as Labiche. Burt was a natural athlete, and
his role here is rather physical. He got injured, he soldiered on. Paul
Scofield superbly plays Colonel von Waldheim. Not in the clip is Wolfgang
Preiss, the colonel's number two, Major Herren. Preiss was a terrific actor;
the Teutonic equivalent of James Mason.
No comments:
Post a Comment