A new book chronicles how the War on Terror opened the ranks to risky
recruits
Since the Vietnam War, America’s more successful interventions have been
brief. That war engendered a legitimacy crisis in the United States military.
Domestically, large numbers of young men resisted the draft or took advantage of
deferments, but conscription still kept the armed forces supplied with men. In
Vietnam, the military was riven by drug use, racial strife, and “fragging”—the
assassination of unpopular officers by their troops. Operation Desert Storm in
1991 may be a model for a successful large-scale intervention post-Vietnam: the
coalition allied with the United States dropped some bombs and sent an
overwhelming ground force; Saddam capitulated while Lee Greenwood provided the
soundtrack. If one ignores pesky issues such as the fate of Iraqi Kurds who
were encouraged to rebel and the blowback from stationing U.S. troops in Saudi
Arabia, the first Gulf War was a big success.
The
United States fares worse when our goals are more ambitious and the enemy
doesn’t quickly fold. When a volunteer army becomes bogged down in an unpopular
war, protesters don’t fill the streets the way they did in 1969, and soldiers
don’t “frag” their officers—people simply stop joining the military. The quest
to fill that enlistment gap is where the investigative work of English
journalist Matt Kennard comes in. In Irregular
Army, Kennard documents a series of disturbing trends in the
military: lowered standards, inadequately treated mental-health and
substance-abuse problems, and the enlistment and retention of white
supremacists, Nazis, and gang members.
Irregular
Army begins
with an investigation of undesirable elements who in years past would have had
difficulty entering and staying in the military, such as racists and Nazi
skinheads. Such extremists have made it into the military before—I briefly
served in the Marine Corps in 1986 with someone who described himself as a
racist skinhead—but Kennard provides background on how today the military often
looks the other way to keep the ranks filled. He interviewed one neo-Nazi who
had tattoos (a Celtic Cross and a Nordic warrior) that recruiters are supposed
to flag. Forrest Fogarty’s story somewhat undercuts Kennard’s thesis, however,
since he actually joined the Army prior to the War on Terror. He is something
of a celebrity as the leader of the skinhead band Attack; he took leave in 2004
to play two concerts in Dresden, Germany. A bitter former girlfriend alerted
the military to his leanings by sending pictures of him at neo-Nazi events, but
that didn’t derail his military career. After his discharge the Southern
Poverty Law Center intervened to keep him out of a job with a private military
contractor.
Kennard’s
confused timeline indicates that the seeds of the extremist infiltration
problem existed before the Iraq War descended into a quagmire, although figures
he received from the Department of Defense indicate that the military almost
stopped the policy of denying reenlistment to undesirables at the height of the
Iraq occupation, with the number of rejections falling from 4,000 in 1994 to a
mere 81 in 2006.
Neo-Nazis
have been joined in the military by members of African-American and Latino
gangs. This came to light in an ugly and frightening fashion in 2005, when
soldiers who were also members of the Chicago-based Gangster Disciples beat an
Army sergeant to death in an initiation gone awry while stationed in Germany.
Tracking gang membership in the military is difficult, as there is no specific
prohibition against belonging to a gang, and according to Kennard the FBI
“cannot gauge the problem of criminal gangs in the country’s fighting forces
because the military [has] refused to report gang activity.” While the killing
is the most disturbing gang-related incident reported in Irregular Army, Kennard
reproduces numerous photos of gang graffiti in Iraq and military personnel
flashing gang symbols, indicating that the 2005 incident was not simply a fluke.
One disturbing
commonality between gang members and neo-Nazis is the possibility that they
look upon the military as a training ground for their own private wars. Kennard
quotes Dennis Mahon, a National Guard veteran with ties to various extremist
organizations, who says, “the soldiers learn from unconventional warfare in
Iraq and they realize that they can use that type of warfare in America and
it’s impossible to stop.” Mahon is now serving time for a bombing in Arizona.
Similarly, Kennard quotes an anonymous FBI agent suggesting that gangs may use
the military for training purposes, noting that they would “get great weapons
training… and access to weapons and arms, and be able to use that knowledge.”
Although
the idea of the government training violent extremists and criminal gangs in
the art of war is disturbing, it is only one upshot of the personnel crisis
that has plagued the military in recent years. The tragic story of Specialist
Travis Virgadamo illustrates another. Virgadamo displayed disturbing signs while
on leave from Iraq in 2007. Instead of going AWOL as he contemplated, he
returned to service,
But his superiors obviously knew something was wrong as they placed him
on suicide watch and removed the bolt from his rifle, rendering it useless. He
was given more pedestrian desk jobs as he tried to sort out his head. But,
inexplicably, Virgadamo was cleared for combat the following month, and on the
night of August 30, 2007, was given his bolt back. Three hours later he walked
out of his barracks and shot himself in the head.
Suicides
among soldiers and veterans reached epidemic proportions in the later years of
the War on Terror. Viragadamo was one of 115 troops to commit suicide in 2007,
a number that would increase to 245 in 2009. Irregular Army features several stories of
soldiers who should have been routed into treatment but were instead sent back
to battle, often with a prescription for Prozac or other antidepressants. The
problem is severe enough that it would be inaccurate to describe troops with mental
health issues as slipping through the cracks—they are plummeting through a
chasm. Suicide isn’t the only concern when troops are pushed beyond the
breaking point; they also commit crimes at home and atrocities abroad.
One
rogue soldier who caused the Army and the government a great deal of stress in
the last few years would likely have been rejected had the military not been
desperate for warm bodies. Bradley Manning had a very troubled entry into the
service. Kennard writes that Manning “was in such a disturbed mental state
before his deployment that he wet himself, threw furniture around, shouted at
his commanding officer, and underwent regular psychiatric evaluations.” He made
it through, in spite of his problems, as Kennard quotes American Conservative contributor
Chase Madar, because of the Army’s “desperation for soldiers with IT and
analytic skills during its historic low in recruitment.”
“Desperation”
is the key word, and Kennard documents a variety of other ways in which the
military’s desperation has led to declining standards of recruitment.
Overweight, less intelligent, or older recruits are not as extreme risks as
Nazis, but they still present challenges. Perhaps the most disturbing
large-scale change has been the rise in age limits. Young people are a better
fit for military service because they both possess more physical endurance and
are more malleable than older people, but in 2006 the Pentagon raised the
maximum age for new recruits from 35 to 40 and shortly thereafter to 42.
Kennard quotes one solider saying that “the type of training they receive is
pretty much geared in one direction and focused on 18- and 20-year-olds just
coming in.” The Army has compensated by lowering physical standards for older
recruits, but as Kennard notes, war doesn’t discriminate: “older recruits… were
at much greater risk of death and injury. In June 2010 it was reported that
566, or 12.1 percent, of the deaths in the War on Terror had been suffered by
over-thirty-fives, a figure which dwarfed their representation in the fighting
force.”
Kennard
examines attempts to ameliorate the recruitment crisis, including the opening
of a “Patriot Academy” on a National Guard base for the purpose of educating
and giving diplomas to would-be soldiers who are short of credits for
high-school graduation. The No Child Left Behind law, passed before the War on
Terror, gave a gift to military recruiters in the form of access to contact
information for high school students from institutions receiving aid under the
bill.
The
recruiting crisis has abated in recent years due to the weak economy and the
drawdown in Iraq, but military needs still cannot be met without the now
necessary aid of mercenaries, lately euphemized as “private military
contractors.” Kennard notes that “it was impossible to do without them: the
broken military could not long stand on its own two feet.”
Irregular
Army goes
into great narrative detail to illustrate an unfolding disaster that has
engulfed the U.S. military, particularly the Army and Marine Corps. My biggest
criticism of Kennard’s book is that it desperately needs charts, graphs, and
timelines. For a book whose thesis has to establish that something went
horribly wrong circa 2005-2006, it is often difficult to tell when particular
events occurred. Neo-Nazi Forest Fogarty is Kennard’s star witness, but it is
difficult to figure out that Fogarty actually joined the Army well before the
War on Terror, which is also true of some of the others that Kennard profiles.
Yet even if one concedes that some of these problems have antecedents before
9/11, Kennard still demonstrates a serious weakness in America’s ability to
recruit a long- or even medium-term occupying force. He makes an obvious point
that should be chiseled into the walls of the Pentagon: American culture is not
conducive to maintaining a force to occupy another country. Policymakers should
take heed—it is preferable that America’s next occupying force not be brought
into existence at all, but if it must be, it shouldn’t come draped in Nazi
regalia.
No comments:
Post a Comment