It's a deeply felt conviction among liberals that they
are the caring party. It's not too much to say that liberals are quite
confident that they are nicer, more moral people than conservatives.
It must require truly titanic powers of denial for the
"moral" and "compassionate" party to maintain its position
on abortion -- a position that leads them into some macabre rationalizations.
Consciences among the morally superior party are agreeably quiescent.
But recent headlines have not been similarly
cooperative. In Florida, the legislature is considering a variant of the
"Born Alive Infants Protection Act," which would require that
abortionists provide medical assistance to infants who are
"accidentally" born alive and kicking during an abortion. (Then State
Senator Barack Obama vociferously opposed similar legislation in Illinois.)
Ms. Alisa LaPolt Snow, representing the Florida
Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified against the bill. Florida
representative Jim Boyd, apparently unsure that he had understood her
correctly, asked:
"So, um, it is just really hard for me to even
ask you this question because I'm almost in disbelief. If a baby is born on a
table as a result of a botched abortion, what would Planned Parenthood want to
have happen to that child that is struggling for life?"
Ms. Snow responded that her organization
"believes that any decision that's made should be left up to the woman,
her family and the physician." In short, as the Weekly Standard
summarized, Florida Planned Parenthood is in favor of "post-birth
abortion." This is consistent with the position of the president of the
United States and most members of the caring party.
Ms. Snow was asked why she didn't support simply
transporting a breathing, moving infant to a hospital where he or she would
have the best chance of survival. Snow developed a sudden concern for ambulance
convenience: "(T)hose situations where it is in a rural health care
setting, the hospital is 45 minutes or an hour away, that's the closest trauma
center or emergency room. You know there's just some logistical issues involved
that we have some concerns about." Really? Logistical concerns?
So if a baby is brought to a rural clinic suffering
from, say, meningitis, and the nearest trauma center is 45 minutes away, does
Planned Parenthood have "concerns" about the "logistical
issues" involved? Or does Planned Parenthood stand for the principle that
when a woman chooses abortion, she is entitled to a dead baby?
Snow's testimony comes at an inopportune moment for
the deniers -- the "abortion rights" absolutists who hotly deny that
infants are ever born alive during botched abortions -- because in
Philadelphia, an abortionist is on trial.
Dr. Kermit Gosnell is on trial for murder in the
deaths of one woman and seven second trimester babies. The 41-year-old woman
had sought an abortion and was given an overdose of narcotics at Gosnell's clinic.
The seven babies were all born alive, according to the indictment. Gosnell then
used scissors to "snip" their spinal columns. One of his assistants,
who pled guilty to third-degree murder, said that such "snippings"
were "routine" for late-term abortions -- so there were probably many
more than seven.
Gosnell wasn't at all particular about gestational
age. An ultrasound technician recorded the age of one baby as 29.4 weeks, or
about 7.5 months. In Pennsylvania, abortions are not permitted after 24 weeks
(and survival is above 85 percent for babies born at 27 weeks). In one case, a
nurse testified that a baby cried after being born. Gosnell snipped his neck
and told the nurse that there was nothing to worry about. He was placed in a
basin on a counter. Another large baby was disposed of in a shoebox, but he was
too large and his feet dangled over the sides. In another case, Gosnell
allegedly joked with a nurse that a baby was so big "he could have walked
to the bus stop."
Gosnell seems to be a particularly freakish
"provider." He kept fetal feet in jars in an office prosecutors
described as a "house of horrors." (Pictures are on the Internet, but
beware: They are graphic.)
Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer of California who
engaged in an unwise colloquy with then-Senator Rick Santorum about when
infants deserve to be treated as people, spoke for many of the caring elite
when she said that life begins when "you take the baby home from the
hospital."
Some day, our descendants will look back at this and
ask how we could have tamely accepted such barbarism. A special obloquy will
attach to the Orwellians who call it compassion.
No comments:
Post a Comment