Revisiting George Orwell’s classic account
of the Spanish Civil War, 75 years on
by Mick Hume
George
Orwell could have been killed twice in the Spanish Civil War. Once when he was
shot in the throat by General Franco’s fascist forces; then when he was hunted
by official Communist agents who, with the backing of Stalin’s Soviet Union,
stabbed the revolution in the back and imprisoned, tortured and killed leading
leftists and anarchists who were ostensibly on the same Republican side. Orwell
learned the hardest way that the war against fascism in Spain was also a civil
war against Stalinism.
Homage to
Catalonia, Orwell’s
famous account of his time in Spain from his arrival in Barcelona on Boxing Day
1936 to his escape in June 1937, has just reached its seventy-fifth
anniversary. Like its author, the book almost didn’t make it either. The
radical journalist and author’s usual publisher, Victor Gollancz, turned the
book down without even seeing the manuscript, insisting that he would not
publish anything ‘which could harm the fight against fascism’ by criticising
the Communists.
Most of
those from Britain and Europe who went to write about and fight in the Spanish
Civil War took a similarly one-eyed view and followed the pro-Soviet line. What
was unique about Orwell was that he hated fascism, but also stood apart from
the official Stalinist-dominated left of his time. The radical maverick wrote
about what he saw in Spain, rather than simply what he was told was true –
although he also warned his readers to ‘beware my partisanship’ when seeking an
objective account. He questioned the ‘official’ Stalinist-dictated account of
events in Barcelona and elsewhere that was accepted around the world. This
heresy made him the subject of a hate campaign when Homage to Catalonia was finally published in 1938, a
campaign which continued well into the 1980s.
Orwell
concedes that when he arrived in Barcelona in December 1936, months after General
Franco’s fascist rebellion down south and the working-class revolt it had
sparked in the Catalan capital, he was politically naive about the situation in
Spain. He wanted to join the International Brigades to fight fascism, but the
Communist Party of Great Britain would not endorse his application. So, almost
by accident via his links with the Independent Labour Party over here, Orwell
ended up at the Lenin Barracks of the workers’ militia attached to the POUM –
the anti-Stalinist Workers Party of Marxist Unification. Orwell confessed he
was initially exasperated by the ‘kaleidoscope’ of different parties, trade
unions and factions vying for influence on the left ‘with their tiresome names
- PSUC, POUM, FAI, CNT, UGT, JCI, JSU, AIT… as if Spain were suffering
from a plague of initials’. The significance of those divisions on the left
would become clear soon enough.
Orwell gives
an account of one corner of the Spanish Civil War from the perspective of an
isolated and frustrated English volunteer. He depicts the militia he fought
with as a poorly trained, barely armed ‘rabble’, capturing the frontline
atmosphere of cold and boredom and squalor and shortages. The ‘characteristic
smell of war’ he describes as one ‘of excrement and decaying food’, and notes with
some sang-froid that, ‘If there is one thing I hate more than another it is a
rat running over me in the darkness. However, I had the satisfaction of
catching one of them a good punch that sent him flying.’ Orwell’s militia unit
generally seemed to have less success landing a meaningful blow in their
somewhat fitful exchanges with the fascist foe.
Yet amid the
vermin and the organised chaos, Orwell was obviously deeply touched by the
decency and heroism of the ordinary Spaniards and foreigners fighting for
freedom by his side. Isolated on the frontline with the workers’ militia, he
recalls: ‘One had been in a community where hope was more normal than apathy or
cynicism, where the word “comrade” stood for comradeship and not, as in most
countries, for humbug. One had breathed the air of equality.’
Like others,
Orwell had gone to Spain in the spirit of anti-fascist idealism. The
International Brigades were themselves partly a symptom of the defeat of the
European left in the era of fascism and Stalinism. Those who could see no
prospect of socialism at home grabbed at the chance to make a stand in Spain.
When the Civil War broke out there in 1936, wrote Orwell, ‘every anti-fascist
in Europe felt a thrill of hope’. Those hopes were to be dashed as they discovered
that the Stalinist apparatchiks who had overseen the demise of the Russian
Revolution were determined to make sure there was no boat-rocking proletarian
revolution in Spain. And nowhere more so than in radical Barcelona.
When Orwell
and his wife Eileen Blair (George’s real name was Eric Blair) first arrived in
Barcelona, a city still largely under the influence of the anarchists who had
led the revolt, he was inspired by the revolutionary spirit in the air (though
also sensing that it was already past its peak): ‘Above all, there was a belief
in the revolution and the future, a feeling of having suddenly emerged into an
era of equality and freedom. Human beings were trying to behave as human beings
and not as cogs in the capitalist machine.’ When he returned from the front
months later, all had changed. The Stalinist-influenced Popular Front
government was reasserting control, and the old divisions were re-emerging with
‘rich people wolfing expensive meals’ in restaurants while the masses went poor
and short.
Despite his
professed naivety, Orwell could now see through all the party initials and
obfuscations to identify what was at the root of the growing political tensions
within Barcelona. ‘The danger was quite simple and intelligible. It was the
antagonism between those who wished the revolution to go forward and those who
wished to check or prevent it – ultimately, between Anarchists and Communists.’
That antagonism came to a head when the authorities moved against POUM and the
anarchists, ordering the disbandment of the workers’ militias, and fighting
broke out in May 1937.
Dismayed by
the turn of events, Orwell still saw it worth supporting the Republican
government against Franco. He argued that the fascists had secured all the
victories since 1930: ‘It was time they got a beating, it hardly mattered from
whom.’ Yet at the same time he was coming to an important conclusion: that in
holding back the people’s revolution, the Stalinists were also making it
impossible to mobilise the forces necessary to win the war against fascism.
Nevertheless,
Orwell returned to the front line, where he was shot and badly wounded in the
throat. He thought this would please his wife, who had seemed keen on him
getting wounded in order to avoid the worse fate of being killed. She was less
pleased to see the patched-up George when he eventually got back to Barcelona,
however. By now the POUM had been branded a ‘disguised fascist’ plot and
suppressed. Its leaders were being imprisoned, tortured and killed, and foreign
volunteers from Mussolini’s Italy and Hitler’s Germany were being deported back
to face the tender mercies of their fascist regimes. In imminent danger, the
Blairs went into hiding before escaping across the border to France in June
1937 by train – the first one he had seen in Spain, Orwell noted, where
first-class carriages and a posh dining car had been reintroduced, a small sign
of changing times. He returned to ‘the deep, deep sleep of England, from which
I sometimes fear that we shall never wake till we are jerked out of it by
bombs’. Barcelona eventually fell to the fascists in January 1939.
Orwell’s
brilliant firsthand account of the conflict stands apart from and well above
the I-was-there school of emotive, narcissistic war reporting we witness too
often today. He also attempts to put his personal experiences into some proper
political context, in two chapters now removed (at his request) from the
narrative text and published at the end as appendices.
Here, Orwell
closely interrogates and challenges the ‘official version’ of events in
Barcelona, put about by the Communists and their many international apologists
to justify their brutal repression of the non-Stalinist left. As he unravels
the twisting of truth by propaganda organs such as the CPGB’s Daily Worker, you can almost
see the ideas he was soon to express in his novels Animal Farm and Nineteen
Eighty-Four. He is also cutting about the way that the Communists simply
branded their opponents as ‘Social-fascists’ and ‘Trotsky-Fascists’ to avoid
engaging in important political arguments. Many who express their admiration
for Orwell today have yet to absorb his point that screaming ‘Fascists!’ in the
faces of those you disagree with is not the same thing as making your case.
‘Libel’, as he concludes, ‘settles nothing’.
The likes of
Orwell and the International Brigades who went to Spain have also often been
cited in recent years by those demanding British and Western intervention in
international crises, from the Balkans to the Middle East. But Orwell and his
comrades-in-arms in the Spanish Civil War of the 1930s were no laptop
bombardiers, demanding that their governments bomb the world to freedom. They
went to fight for what they believed in. Orwell himself observed with suitable
scepticism the presence of Royal Navy warships off the coast during the height
of the Barcelona crisis: ‘It is at least inherently likely that the British
government, which had not raised a finger to save the Spanish government from
Franco, would intervene quickly enough to save it from its own working class.’
Orwell may
not always have been right. However, he was willing not only to fight fascism
on the battlefield, but also to speak out almost alone in Britain against the
pro-Stalinist consensus on the European left. Seventy-five years on, Homage to Catalonia should still make us grateful that the
military doctor who told the wounded Orwell that he had lost his voice forever
was wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment