The U.S. is in dire danger of having a permanent class of long-term unemployed
Long-term unemployment is one of the most
vexing problems the U.S. faces, and today’s jobs report shows all-too-meager
progress in fixing it.
The U.S. created 165,000 new jobs in
April, pushing down the unemployment rate to 7.5 percent from March’s 7.6
percent. But as of the end of April, 4.4 million Americans, or 37 percent of
the unemployed, had been without a job for 27 weeks or longer, barely better
than March’s 39 percent. The U.S. can’t afford to write
off more
than 4 million people who would like to work but haven’t for more than six
months.
Long-term joblessness peaked in April 2010
at 6.7 million, so the picture might seem to be improving. Hidden within that
number is this troubling fact: The average unemployed person has been out of
work for 36.5 weeks. That’s not much better than the December
2011 duration of 40.7 weeks, which was the longest since World War II.
Long-term unemployment at the start of the recession in December 2007 was 1.3
million people, and the average duration was 16.6 weeks.
Terrible things happen to people when they
are out of work for long periods, numerous studies show. Beyond a sharp drop in income,
long-term unemployment is associated with higher rates of suicide, cancer
(especially among men) and divorce. The children of the long-term unemployed
also show an increased probability of having to repeat a
grade in
school.
Finding
Causes
There is less agreement on why so many
people have been out of work for so long. Democrats generally point to the
anemic recovery, in which weak demand for goods and services results in less
hiring. The cyclical nature of unemployment, they say, can be addressed with
more government stimulus.
Republicans tend to focus more on
structural problems, in which the education and experience levels of the
unemployed don’t match what employers say they want in job candidates. More
government spending, they say, would be a waste of money because it won’t close
the skills gap. Some Republicans also think that extended unemployment benefits
are a disincentive to job hunters.
Recently, though, economists in both camps have come to agree
that something bigger -- and more insidious -- is at work: Unemployment causes
social scarring. In other words, the stigma of long-term joblessness is, by
itself, causing persistent joblessness. This is true whether you have a college
degree or a high-school diploma, whether you are middle-aged or 20- something.
It’s also true whether your collar is blue or white.
When researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of
Boston sent fake resumes to employers with job openings, the length of time
candidates had been out of work mattered more than their job experience in
determining who got called in for an interview. Applicants who had only
recently lost a job but had no relevant experience were far more likely to be
called than those with many years of experience who had been out of work a long
time. So much for the skills gap.
One way to thwart such bias is to make
sure the unemployed understand that their chances of getting work improve if
they are in a job-training program or working at least part-time. Not sitting
idle is
paramount. This is where government can help.
Unfortunately, the U.S.’s job training
effort is a mishmash of 47 programs spread across nine agencies. At $18 billion
a year, it’s also costly. The effectiveness of those programs is hard to
quantify because of poor data collection and management oversight, the
Government Accountability Office concluded in 2011.
Only five of the 47 programs could
demonstrate whether a positive outcome -- meaning a trainee got a job, for
example, or obtained a new credential -- could be attributed to the program.
About half the programs hadn’t had a performance review since 2004.
Finding
Solutions
Finding out what works is crucial. Other
solutions should be tried, including giving preference to the long-term
unemployed when filling federal government jobs. In addition, President Barack Obama should ask Congress to approve tax
breaks for companies that hire the long-term unemployed.
Work-share programs, in which employees
accept reduced hours when demand is slack in exchange for unemployment
insurance to compensate for lost wages, has worked in other countries. The U.S.
should also experiment with state-based clearinghouses that connect employers
with job-seekers in other states and subsidize the moving expenses.
The U.S. is in dire danger of having a
permanent class of long-term unemployed. It has to do better.
No comments:
Post a Comment