Turkey in Turmoil
By M K Bhadrakumar
One
thing that Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said before pushing
ahead on Tuesday with a four-day tour of the Maghreb tour still hangs suspended
in the air. Hardly anyone picked it up. He said Turkish intelligence is looking
into possible links between the recent incidents in Istanbul, scene of
violently suppressed protests, and foreign elements.
Erdogan
hinted that some leads are already available with the Turkish intelligence.
"Our intelligence work is ongoing. It is not possible to reveal their
names. But we will have meetings with their heads."
His
words suggested that there might have been concerted foreign interference.
Logically, the eyes turn toward Damascus, Tehran and Baghdad. But then, Erdogan
also blamed Twitter for inciting unrest. He said,
There
is now a menace, which is called Twitter. The best examples of lies can be
found there. To me, social media is the worst menace to society.
The
regimes in Syria, Baghdad and Iran should be out of their minds to dabble in
the US-controlled social media as instruments of their regional policies.
Besides, the reactions of the three countries to the Turkish unrest are
conspicuously reticent under the current circumstances of intense mutual
hostility, and quite apparently they have been taken by surprise that the
ground beneath the feet of the Sultan in Istanbul could shift just like that.
Straws
in the wind
What
stands out in sharp contrast is the shrill, intrusive reaction of the United
States. Washington has so far made six statements regarding the unrest in
Turkey through the past five-day period since May 31, mostly at the level of
the White House. These statements have been highly critical of Erdogan.
They
viewed the protests as peaceful acts by ordinary law-abiding citizens
exercising their rights to free expression. They expressed concern about the
government's response to the protesters and "expected" Ankara to work
through the issue while "respecting its [Turkey's] citizens' rights".
The
White House considered that the Turkish government resorted to excessive use of
force and called for the events to be investigated. Secretary of State John
Kerry added that the Obama administration is "deeply concerned" by
the large number of people who have been injured. Kerry said:
We are concerned by the reports of excessive use of force by police. We obviously hope there will be a full investigation of those incidents and full restraint from the police force with respect to those incidents. We urge all people involved ... to avoid any provocations or violence.
The US
has taken up the matter with the Turkish government through diplomatic
channels.
Indeed,
something is strange in this overreaction, and it is not only as regards the
disproportionate and harsh US pronouncements - considering that Erdogan and
President Barack Obama had some special chemistry between them - but also
because the US reaction looks suspiciously defensive.
These
are early days, and firm conclusions cannot yet be made as to what exactly is
happening in Turkey. However, there are straws in the wind.
Hereby
hangs a tale
No
sooner had Erdogan's jet taken off from the Essenboga airport on his scheduled
trip to North Africa than Deputy Prime Minister Bulent Arinc visited the
presidential palace in Ankara to meet President Abdullah Gul. The two leaders
thereupon publicly took a radically different approach than Erdogan's to the
ongoing unrest.
Erdogan
had summarily dismissed the protesters as "ideologically" motivated
hoodlums with links to foreign powers and had no word of regret for the police
excesses. Arinc, on the contrary, acknowledged that the original protesters
were "right and legitimate" and the police methods were brutal, for
which he even apologized. Indeed, he has since agreed to meet the protesters on
Wednesday.
Again, Erdogan
was harsh on the opposition Republican People's Party for inciting the
protests, whereas Gul received its leader at the presidential palace for a
discussion.
Erdogan
argues that he won a handsome mandate in the last parliamentary poll, which
gave him the prerogative to implement his programs, but Gul contradicts him
that democracy is about more than holding elections.
To be
sure, the secularists and liberals and the Kemalist camp have promptly greeted
Gul as more conciliatory, more receptive to democratic ideals and generally
more pro-Western than Erdogan.
Curiously,
Erdogan, Gul and Arinc are being described in the same breath as the
"founding fathers" of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP),
although Turks all over would know that Erdogan is as peerless as any sultan in
their history.
And the
intriguing part is that this characterization of an AKP "Troika" is
the handiwork of the Zaman newspaper. Of course, Zaman is run by the followers
of the hugely powerful faith-based Fetullah Gulen movement ( http://www.minority-opinion.com/2012/10/who-is-fethullah-gulen.html - http://www.minority-opinion.com/2012/11/another-take-on-fethullah-gulen.html). Hereby hangs a
tale.
Paragon
of 'moderate' Islam
Although
the Gulen movement had supported the Islamist AKP's march to power, a distance
had developed between Erdogan and Gulen in recent years. Erdogan has been
plainly indifferent toward Gulen and averse to submitting to him. In contrast,
after meeting Gulen recently, Arinc showered praise on him in a TV interview and
pointedly called him as "Hocaefendi", a title that his
followers use for him. Arinc said Gulen is the "conscience of 75 million
people" in Turkey.
Arinc's
meeting with Gulen took place in Philadelphia during Erdogan's recent visit to
the US, but the prime minister himself kept away.
Now,
all this may seem out of context unless one has the background of Gulen, who
heads one of the most influential movements in the Islamic world and which is
regarded as drawing on the moderate mystical traditions of Sufism. He fled
Turkey in 1999 amid accusations of plotting to overthrow the secular government
at that time and has been living in exile on a 10-hectare haven in the
mountains of eastern Pennsylvania.
According
to a well-researched report by the New York Times, his Green Card application
shows that Gulen's request to remain in the United States was endorsed by a
former top official dealing with the Middle East in the Central Intelligence
Agency. [1]
The
mystery deepens when it transpires that the CIA's case officer also is an
authority on the "Arab Spring" and political Islam, with a long
career track specializing in the use of Islam as an instrument of US regional
policies.
Suffice
to say, Zaman newspaper has opened the heavy artillery on Erdogan and is
exhorting Gul and Arinc to take on the mantle of leadership. Zaman commentaries
have virtually called for a revolt against Erdogan by AKP stalwarts.
Erdogan
faces an existential challenge. The heart of the matter is that he has grown in
stature through the past decade in power taking Turkey to unprecedented heights
of prosperity and striding the Arab Muslim world as a role model.
In the process, paradoxically, it has also become increasingly difficult for the US to harness his energy. Erdogan has become uncontrollable - be it in his stance on Syria, support for Iraqi Kurdistan, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, or his visceral hatred toward Israel.
In the process, paradoxically, it has also become increasingly difficult for the US to harness his energy. Erdogan has become uncontrollable - be it in his stance on Syria, support for Iraqi Kurdistan, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, or his visceral hatred toward Israel.
Waving
the red flag
Woven
into all this is also a congruence of interests between the US and Gulen in
weakening and destabilizing Erdogan. From Gulen's perspective, Erdogan not only
defies him, but is also accelerating a historic compromise with the PKK, a
Kurdish group that he is violently opposed to. By the way, a WikiLeaks cable
dated 2009 by the then US ambassador to Turkey, James F Jeffrey, assessed that
the Gulen movement was strong in the police and security agencies.
Interestingly,
Ambassador Jeffrey wrote,
The political context for conversations about Gulen is complicated because President Gul is himself seen by almost all of our contacts as a Gulenist, while Prime Minister Erdogan is not. Indeed, some of our contacts have argued that Erdogan is so firmly outside the Gulen camp that Gulen loyalists view him as a liability. At the same time, the Republican People's Party and other AKP opponents of the ruling Justice and Development Party are quick to accuse the US of working covertly to prop up Gulen, allegedly to weaken Turkey's secular foundation to produce a "model" moderate Islamic nation. [2]
Make no mistake, Turkey's unrest is not going to wither away. Gulen is
making his epic move to bring about an "in-house" political coup
within the AKP to bring Gul to the fore. Gulen has Washington's support for
this "regime change" in Turkey. The Middle East situation has reached
a criticality, and who rules Turkey becomes of seminal importance.
But will Erdogan walk into the sunset without a fight? Such meekness
wouldn't be the hallmark of a sultan. Marc Champion, editor at Bloomberg, is
spot on:
If the president is able to calm the protests before Erdogan returns in three days - as the prime minister says he hopes - Gul will get the credit. If Gul can create a new coalition across the opposition parties, he would be a great choice to lead them and would provide a good change for Turkey. But don't count on it ... Erdogan isn't just a political bruiser. He is a force of nature, and has a genius for turning events to his advantage. The party was built and succeeded around Erdogan's popular appeal, not Gul's. [3]
Meanwhile,
the Syrian crisis has introduced another dimension into this. Gul is a protege
of the Saudi royal family, whereas Erdogan shares the Qatari Emir's passion for
the Muslim Brotherhood.
Evidently, Israel is terribly excited about the outcome of the turmoil
in Turkey. The Ha'aretz newspaper has begun a "live blog" on the
happenings. Equally, Tehran has counseled Erdogan to show "prudence",
virtually waving the red flag, despite all the differences with him, that
powerful forces could be arrayed against him.
Notes:
1. Turkey Feels Sway of Reclusive Cleric in the US, The New York Times, April 24, 2012.
2. See here.
3. Is Turkey's President Playing Good Cop to Erdogan's Bad Cop?, Bloomberg, June 4, 2013.
Notes:
1. Turkey Feels Sway of Reclusive Cleric in the US, The New York Times, April 24, 2012.
2. See here.
3. Is Turkey's President Playing Good Cop to Erdogan's Bad Cop?, Bloomberg, June 4, 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment