By RT
Jeff
Olson, the 40-year-old man who is being prosecuted for scrawling anti-megabank
messages on sidewalks in water-soluble chalk last year now faces a 13-year jail
sentence. A judge has barred his attorney from mentioning freedom of speech
during trial.
According
to the San Diego Reader, which reported on Tuesday that a judge had opted to
prevent Olson’s attorney from
"mentioning the First Amendment, free speech, free expression, public forum, expressive conduct, or political speech during the trial,” Olson must now stand trial for on 13 counts of vandalism.
In
addition to possibly spending years in jail, Olson will also be held liable for
fines of up to $13,000 over the anti-big-bank slogans that were left using
washable children's chalk on a sidewalk outside of three San Diego, California
branches of Bank of America, the massive conglomerate that received $45 billion
in interest-free loans from the US government in 2008-2009 in a bid to keep it
solvent after bad bets went south.
The Reader
reports that Olson’s hearing had gone as poorly as his attorney might have
expected, with Judge Howard Shore, who is presiding over the case, granting
Deputy City Attorney Paige Hazard's motion to prohibit attorney Tom Tosdal from
mentioning the United States' fundamental First Amendment rights.
"The State's Vandalism Statute does not mention First Amendment rights,"ruled Judge Shore on Tuesday.
Upon
exiting the courtroom Olson seemed to be in disbelief.
"Oh my gosh," he said. "I can't believe this is happening."
Tosdal,
who exited the courtroom shortly after his client, seemed equally bewildered.
"I've never heard that before, that a court can prohibit an argument of First Amendment rights," said Tosdal.
Olson, who
worked as a former staffer for a US Senator from Washington state, was said to
involve himself in political activism in tandem with the growth of the Occupy
Wall Street movement.
On October
3, 2011, Olson first appeared outside of a Bank of America branch in San Diego,
along with a homemade sign. Eight days later Olson and his partner, Stephen
Daniels, during preparations for National Bank Transfer Day, the two were
confronted by Darell Freeman, the Vice President of Bank of America’s Global Corporate
Security.
A former
police officer, Freeman accused Olson and Daniels of “running a business
outside of the bank,” evidently in reference to the National Bank Transfer Day
activities, which was a consumer activism initiative that sought to promote
Americans to switch from commercial banks, like Bank of America, to
not-for-profit credit unions.
At the
time, Bank of America’s debit card fees were among one of the triggers that led
Occupy Wall Street members to promote the transfer day.
"It was just an empty threat," says Olson of Freeman’s accusations. "He was trying to scare me away. To be honest, it did at first. I even called my bank and they said he couldn't do anything like that."
Olson
continued to protest outside of Bank of America. In February 2012, he came
across a box of chalk at a local pharmacy and decided to begin leaving his mark
with written statements.
"I thought it was a perfect way to get my message out there. Much better than handing out leaflets or holding a sign," says Olson.
Over the
course of the next six months Olson visited the Bank of America branch a few
days per week, leaving behind scribbled slogans such as"Stop big
banks" and "Stop Bank Blight.com."
According
to Olson, who spoke with local broadcaster KGTV, one Bank of America branch
claimed it had cost $6,000 to clean up the chalk writing.
Public
records obtained by the Reader show that Freeman continued to pressure members
of San Diego’s Gang Unit on behalf of Bank of America until the matter was
forwarded to the City Attorney’s office.
On April
15, Deputy City Attorney Paige Hazard contacted Freeman with a response on his
persistent queries.
"I wanted to let you know that we will be filing 13 counts of vandalism as a result of the incidents you reported," said Hazard.
Arguments
for Olson’s case are set to be heard Wednesday morning, following jury
selection.
No comments:
Post a Comment