Short Answer : NO
In the 15th century,
the highest standard of living in the world belonged to China. Places like Nanjing had reached the
pinnacle of civilization with incredibly modern infrastructure, robust
economies, substantial international trade, great healthcare, and a rising
middle class.
Across
the globe, Europeans were living out short, mud-filled, brutish lives in
squalid poverty, dying off by the thousands from the bubonic plague. They were
practically Neanderthals compared to the Chinese, and explorers like Marco Polo
wrote fanciful tales of wealth and opulence in the east.
If you had told a Chinese merchant at the time that,
over the course of the next several hundred years, global primacy would shift
to Europe (and a relatively unknown American continent), you would have been
laughed at. It was simply unthinkable given how advanced China was over the
west.
And
yet, it happened. History shows us that the great things about western
civilization (Industrial Revolution, technological achievement) and the
not-so-great things about western civilization (imperialism, slavery, genocide)
caused the tables to turn and primacy to shift from east to west.
Ironically, the tables are turning yet again, and its
driven by a number of factors.
At the
tail end of World War II, a new global financial system was concocted that was
heavily biased to disproportionately benefit the United States. Over the
subsequent decades, foreign countries would obligingly mop up US government
largess and finance out of control retail consumption.
It got
to the point where people felt it was a natural right of Americans to have huge
homes, cheap gas, and oodles of junk, as well as a government that could buy
anything it wanted without giving a second thought to fiscal discipline. Much
of this was made possible at the expense of peasant workers overseas.
For
years, they imported US inflation and suffered a tremendous disparity in
standard of living, all because of how the global financial system was set up.
This system, based on the United States as the center of the economic universe,
is now completely fractured, and it’s the biggest game changer in centuries.
Is it possible that such a force can be stopped or
reversed? Highly unlikely.
These
huge sea changes in the global order happen slowly, like titanic ships changing
course in a tight canal. The initial seeds of change were planted decades ago
when the US began running consistent budget deficits in the early 1960s, and
even before that when the Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913 (which forever
corrupted the nation’s money supply).
The
negative momentum has been building for an exceptionally long time. Today’s
debt, inflation, and unemployment crises are merely the latest symptoms of a
cancer that has been growing for decades.
In total objectivity, the patient is beyond cure at
this point… and the math is quite simple.
The US
debt situation is already very precarious, and even the government’s own budget
shows continued deficits for years and years to come. Undoubtedly, this
represents some level of risk for the nation’s creditors, and market
participants will require a greater return on investment in order to justify
the risk of loaning money to the US government.
Even
assuming that all existing debt is rolled into new bonds, higher borrowing
costs will absolutely cripple the Treasury. The more money they borrow, the
higher their borrowing costs will become; yet, the higher their borrowing costs
become, the more money they’ll have to borrow to make interest payments.
Nations typically enter this vicious cycle once they
start having to borrow money just to pay interest on what they already owe. The
US is already way past this point.
If you
study US financial conditions, you’ll see that mandatory entitlement programs
like Social Security and Medicare soak up over 75% of all federal tax revenue
collected. That’s before paying a penny in interest on the debt. The rest of
the budget constitutes several trillion dollars in other expenses like
genital-groping TSA agents.
As
such, given the current budget just for the sacrosanct areas like defense and
senior benefits, tax revenue falls short. America has to borrow to pay its
interest expense.
Is it possible for a white knight to come riding in
and slash spending by the necessary (and brutal) 50%++ just to break even? Possible, but extremely unlikely
without granting him/her dictatorial powers. Getting a majority of 435 members
of Congress to sign up for such painful political consequences is dubious at
best.
Even
still, such cuts would just be enough to break even. In order to actually make
progress on paying down the debt, one would have to make even steeper cuts… and
that’s just at today’s levels. The debt grows worse by the day, as do useless
‘economic recovery’ spending measures.
As
such, borrowing costs are set to rise, causing the budget deficit to spiral out
of control towards an eventual default.
Since
so much of the global financial system is based on the US treasury market, this
will set off a chain reaction of bank defaults and commercial bankruptcies, not
to mention trigger a wave of credit default swap and other derivative
obligations to the tune of several trillion dollars.
The other (more likely) possibility is that the
Federal Reserve will continue to finance the deficit by conjuring additional
money supply out of thin air, eventually leading to a loss of confidence in the
dollar as a reasonable store of value.
The
only reason this hasn’t happened already is because there is no viable
alternative yet, however there are clear signs that investors, foreign
governments and foreign central banks are scrambling for a solution [especially
with the demand for physical gold remaining high].
Barring
a benevolent dictator or some kind of miracle, this situation is unstoppable
and irreversible until the next cycle of the global pecking order turns the
tables once again.
No comments:
Post a Comment