Erdogan's spending spree has left Turks with a horrendous hangover
By Spengler
Pitched
battles between anti-government demonstrators and Turkish police over several
days at Istanbul's Taksim Square constitute a national uprising against Recep
Tayyip Erdogan's incipient Islamist dictatorship. As of this writing on June 2,
tens of thousands of regime opponents are in control of the heart of Istanbul
while police have withdrawn. The economic distress of Turkish households is an
important factor in the country's political upheaval.
News
media have already dubbed the demonstrations a "Turkish Spring". That
is a turnabout, for the "Turkish model" was touted two years ago as
the solution to the economic and social problems of the failing police states
of Arab nationalism. Erdogan's supposedly moderate Islamism and dynamic economic
management supposedly offered a way out for Egypt and other failed economies of
the Middle East.
Erdogan
had declared himself a "servant of Sharia" during his 1994 mayoral
campaign in Istanbul, but most Western observers chose to take the would-be
Turkish dictator at his subsequent word that he would respect the secular
character of the Turkish state.
It was never to be. Erdogan did not preside over
an economic miracle - contrary to the credulous estimates of many Western
observes - but arranged, rather the usual sort of Third World credit bubble,
which has left Turkish consumers to tighten their belts in response to a
devastating debt burden. "Economic troubles will dominate the political
agenda, and Erdogan's claim to leadership of the Islamic world - let alone his
own country - will look far less credible," I warned in this space April
23 (see Turkey's ticking debt time-bomb, Asia Times Online), just before Moody's
assigned Turkey an investment-grade rating, perhaps the poorest judgment by the
rating agency since it put a "Aaa" stamp on securities backed by
subprime mortgages.
Turkey's
problems can't really be compared to the 2011 revolts in Muslim North Africa,
to be sure: the country's economy will keep functioning, although far below the
expectations of ordinary Turks, and its political system is robust. But the
anti-government demonstrations denote a turning point in the fortunes of
Turkish Islamism.
The
demonstrators' anger, to be sure, centers on Erdogan's creeping dictatorship:
the gradual imposition of Islamic law in a Turkish state founded on secular
principles, the jailing of hundreds of regime opponents, and the assimilation
of enormous economic power into corrupt monopolies controlled by Erdogan's
party. Leaked US diplomatic cables claimed in 2010 that Erdogan amassed a huge
personal fortune through bribery during his term and commissions on the sale of
Turkish assets to foreign investors. [1] Kemal Kilicdaroglu, leader of the secular
opposition party CHP, compared Erdogan to Hitler.
Syria's
civil war, moreover, sharpens Turkey's sectarian and ethnic divisions. Perhaps
a fifth of Turks adhere to the Alevi sect, a branch of Islam that fairly could
be described as moderate, and which votes mainly for the secular parties.
Erdogan's emergence as the leader of militant Sunnism in Syria as well as Gaza,
where he patronizes Hamas, worries the Alevis, who have a long memory of Sunni
persecution. The Alevis have little to do with Syria's Alawites, the Assad
family's minority sect, but the Alevis have some sympathy for the Assad
government because the Turkish Sunnis are so determined to destroy it.
The
Kurdish minority comprises more than a fifth of Turkey, and its fertility rate
is double or triple that of Turkish-speakers. Ethnic Turkish Sunnis - the
population segment to which the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP)
appeals - barely make up a majority of the Turkish population, and the
demographic trend will make them a minority in 20 years or less. Syria's two
million Kurds have become an independent factor as a result of their country's
civil war, with their own municipal administrations and militias. They view
Arab jihadists who dominate the rebel forces with justifiable fear and
distrust. Again, Erdogan's backing of the Sunni rebels upsets Turkey's Kurds.
Source: Pew Institute, April 2013.
That is why Erdogan's mandate rested on economic performance. His Sunni fundamentalist agenda does not appeal to the Turkish majority. But he drew votes from secular Turks on the putative strength of his economic management. The analogy to Hitler is in some respects odious, but it holds in characterizing Erdogan's covert agenda to impose an ideological dictatorship. The Turkish public correctly views as creeping Sharia the government's new laws that prohibit the sale of alcohol after 10 pm and ban any portrayal of alcohol consumption in public media.
In his
2011 presidential campaign, Erdogan emulated an earlier Anatolian, namely St
Nicholas. As I wrote in a 2012 study for Middle East Quarterly, Erdogan's bubble recalls the
experiences of Argentina in 2000 and Mexico in 1994 where surging external debt
produced short-lived bubbles of prosperity, followed by currency devaluations
and deep slumps. Both Latin American governments bought popularity by providing
cheap consumer credit as did Erdogan in the months leading up to the June 2011
national election. [3]
Erdogan's
politically directed generosity has come back to bite Turkish consumers.
Personal consumption is falling in real terms. GDP growth is close to zero,
propped by a 20% rate of growth in government consumption. With government
spending dominating economic activity at the margin, it is not surprising that
Turkey's inflation rate stands at 7%.
Exhibit
1: Turkish GDP, household consumption, and government consumption (year-on-year
percent change)
Source: Central Bank of Turkey
The aggregate economic data disguise growing distress in the Turkish economy. Government data distinguish salaried employment in the formal sector from "unpaid family employment" and "self-employment". During the past year, employment in the formal sector-has shrunk by 5%, while "unpaid family employment" has risen by 5%. That means simply that manufacturing and service workers with real jobs were laid off and took the bus back to hard-scrabble farms in central Anatolia or sponged on small family businesses. This is disguised unemployment. A 5% shrinkage in the formal economy workforce is a devastating result.
The aggregate economic data disguise growing distress in the Turkish economy. Government data distinguish salaried employment in the formal sector from "unpaid family employment" and "self-employment". During the past year, employment in the formal sector-has shrunk by 5%, while "unpaid family employment" has risen by 5%. That means simply that manufacturing and service workers with real jobs were laid off and took the bus back to hard-scrabble farms in central Anatolia or sponged on small family businesses. This is disguised unemployment. A 5% shrinkage in the formal economy workforce is a devastating result.
Exhibit
2: Formal employment, "unpaid family" and
"self-employment," (year-on-year change)
Source: Central Bank of Turkey
Turkey's economy, oddly vaunted as the next China, relies on low- and medium-tech exports to Europe, the Arab world, and the former Soviet Union. It grew as a cheap-labor outlet for European and some Asian manufacturers and sank as the European economic crisis, Russian economic stagnation and disarray among Muslim trading partners shrank its markets. It has a lower rate of high-school graduation than Mexico and an enormous informal economy. A few Turkish universities teach to world standards, but Turkey has nothing to compare to the talent pool of China, Taiwan or Korea.
Turkey's economy, oddly vaunted as the next China, relies on low- and medium-tech exports to Europe, the Arab world, and the former Soviet Union. It grew as a cheap-labor outlet for European and some Asian manufacturers and sank as the European economic crisis, Russian economic stagnation and disarray among Muslim trading partners shrank its markets. It has a lower rate of high-school graduation than Mexico and an enormous informal economy. A few Turkish universities teach to world standards, but Turkey has nothing to compare to the talent pool of China, Taiwan or Korea.
Exhibit
3: Turkish consumer credit outstanding
Source: Central Bank of Turkey.
To
sustain the consumer bubble, Turkey ran a current account deficit that reached
10% in 2012, financed overwhelmingly with short-term debt-provided in large
measure, according to anecdotal evidence, by the Sunni Gulf States who view
Turkey as a bulwark against Iran.
Exhibit
4: Turkish short-term external debt
Source: Central Bank of Turkey.
Turkey's
short-term foreign debt is still growing at a 30% annual rate year on year (and
at a 70% annual rate during the first three months of 2013). The economic
slowdown was supposed to have reduced Turkey's foreign borrowing; instead, it
has accelerated. The patience of Turkey's funders in the Persian Gulf is long
but not unlimited.
Consumer
debt outstanding has risen nearly 10-fold since 2006, and jumped by 40% during
the past year. As I noted in my April 23 essay, it is hard to reconcile a 40%
annual increase in consumer debt with a 5% annual increase in nominal consumer
spending (inflation is running at 7%, so real spending is down by 2%). The data
imply that Turkish consumers are borrowing enormous amounts to refinance the
interest they owe on their existing debt.
Erdogan's
spending spree of 2011 has left Turks with a horrendous hangover. Banks cannot
balloon their consumer loan book by 40% a year indefinitely; when the music
stops, Turkish households will have to reduce their consumption sharply.
Debt-burdened consumers know that this must happen sooner rather than later,
and this presentiment probably helps sour the national mood.
"Turkey's
longer-term risks are even more daunting," I wrote in the cited essay for
Middle East Quarterly. "A developing country cannot sustain a fertility
rate that leads to a rapid increase in elderly dependents, yet the fertility
rate of Turks for whom Turkish is a first language has been in steady decline
over the past fifteen years, falling to only 1.5-equal to that of Europe-while
its population is aging almost as fast as Iran's, leaving the country's social
security system with a deficit of close to 5 percent of GDP. "If we
continue the existing [fertility] trend, 2038 will mark disaster for us,"
Erdogan warned in a May 2010 speech." Within a generation, half of Turkey's
military age men will come from Kurdish-speaking homes if the present trend
continues.
In
retrospect, analysts of Turkish politics may conclude, Erdogan's Islamism was
not a fresh start for Turkey but rather a belated attempt to pour Islamic glue into
the cracks that threaten to fracture Turkish society. He may already have
failed. A growing proportion of Turkish voters has concluded that they made a
deal with the devil, and that the devil hasn't kept his side of the bargain.
Notes:
1. US cables claim Turkish PM Erdogan
has eight Swiss bank accounts, Hurriyet Daily News, November 29, 2010.
2. The World's Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society, Pew Research Center on Religion and Public Life, April 30, 2013.
3. Ankara's 'Economic Miracle' Collapses, The Middle East Quarterly, Volume XIX, Number 1, Winter, 2012.
2. The World's Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society, Pew Research Center on Religion and Public Life, April 30, 2013.
3. Ankara's 'Economic Miracle' Collapses, The Middle East Quarterly, Volume XIX, Number 1, Winter, 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment