Central-planning manipulation "works" by closing all the safety valves of market feedback, creating a dangerous but politically appealing illusion of stability and "growth."
by
Charles Hugh-Smith
If we
see the economy as a system, we understand why removing or suppressing feedback
inevitably leads to financial crashes. The essential feature of stable,
robust systems (for example, healthy ecosystems) is their wealth of feedback
loops and the low-intensity background volatility that complex feedback
generates.
The
essential feature of unstable, crash-prone systems is monoculture, an
artificial structure imposed by a central authority that eliminates or
suppresses feedback in service of a simplistic goal--for example, increasing
the yield on a single crop, or pushing everyone with cash into risk assets.
Resistance
seems futile, but the very act of suppressing feedback dooms the system to
collapse.
Removing
or suppressing feedback seems to work wonders because the systemic risks
generated by this suppression are pushed out of sight. The euro is an excellent example of
this dynamic.
The
system of national currencies is in essence a gigantic feedback mechanism, as
the relative value of a nation's currency reflects its cost structure, trade
deficits or surpluses, fiscal deficits, interest rates, central bank policies
and a host of other inputs.
A
currency that is allowed to fluctuate acts as a "safety valve"
feedback when an economy become imbalanced. If the costs of production in one
nation are relatively high, its exports will decline and its imports will rise.
This leads to large trade deficits, which (except in the case of the reserve
currency, the U.S. dollar) lead to lower currency valuations, which feeds back
into imports and exports: imports become relatively more expensive as the
currency loses buying power internationally, and exports rise as the nations'
goods and services become relatively less expensive to other nations.
The net
result of this currency feedback loop is to lower imports and increase exports,
bringing the trade deficit back into relative balance.
The
euro effectively removed this complex feedback from all the economies that
accepted the euro. This is the root cause of the European debt crisis: credit was
allowed to reach insane levels of fragility and excess because the feedback
that was once provided by national currencies and central bank/fiscal policies
was removed from the system.
This is
why claims that the European Central Bank (ECB) will "do whatever it
takes" to maintain the euro's suppression of feedback are doomed to
failure.Removing or
suppressing feedback allows risk and structural imbalances to pile up to the
point they threaten the entire system. This is the case in Europe, Japan, China
and the U.S.
In
Japan and the U.S., the central banks and fiscal authorities in the central
state have suppressed market feedback by pushing interest rates to near-zero
and then using the central banks' unlimited ability to create money to buy
government bonds. This suppresses feedback from the bond market and from the
political sphere, as cheap money and unlimited issuance of government debt
(bonds) enables politicos to avoid painful restructuring and choices.
If you
eliminate feedback from the markets, you get asset bubbles and huge deficits.
Those
extremes goose "growth" for the short-term, but the suppression of
feedback only dams up risks and imbalances: out of sight, out of mind. But the
imbalances haven't vanished; they're piling up unseen in the system, where they
eventually break out at the system's weakest point.
Central-planning
manipulation "works" by closing all the safety valves of market
feedback, creating a dangerous but politically appealing illusion of stability
and "growth." But the consequences of removing or suppressing feedback
are catastrophic longer term, as the imbalances and risks pile up unseen until
they bring down the entire system.
No comments:
Post a Comment