'Like the Coming of the Messiah'
Apparently
politicians in the Southern European periphery are the victims of some sort of
mass delusion. Their shared hope is that Germany's chancellor Ms. Merkel will
somehow be transmogrified by her likely reelection and become a kind of
Teutonic Santa Claus overnight. According to a press report
“Like the coming of the messiah, depressed southern Europe nations await Angela Merkel's likely victory in Germany's September election with a mixture of hope and trepidation.
Four years into the euro zone debt crisis, people in debt-laden Spain, Italy, Greece, Portugal and Cyprus are deeply worried that a third term in power for the conservative chancellor may only bring them more austerity and pain.
The five countries that implemented Merkel's anti-crisis recipes and cut spending massively in areas such as health and education, have been in or close to recession since 2008. Unemployment tops 27 percent in Spain and Greece.
Their leaders, however, disagree. Confident that Merkel will tone down her budget cutting mantra and accept more burden-sharing within the euro zone, they are positioning themselves as close allies of Europe's main paymaster.
"I think we will see a different Mrs Merkel after the elections," said Cypriot President Nicos Anastasiades, echoing a view shared by most of his fellow southern European leaders.
In Greece, where crunch time for plugging a budget gap with a third bailout of the country starts at the end of September, hopes are high that debt issues can finally be sorted out after the German election, maybe through a new debt write-off.
In Italy and Portugal, where austerity has not yielded many positive results, policymakers believe Merkel will accept a more balanced model for managing the economic crisis if she wins. In Spain, where banks were rescued with 42 billion euros of European money, expectations are that the chancellor will lean towards common euro zone debt issuance and accept a full-fledged banking union, unlocking credit in the recession-hit nation.”
(emphasis added)
Before
commenting any further, we simply must point out again that all this yammering
about 'austerity' is quite pointless. One cannot expect to turn the economy
around by imposing a slew of additional taxes on the private sector and not
do anything to actually shrink the government.
There simply have not been any 'massive spending cuts to health and education'
as alleged in the article above. There have been almost no spending cuts at
all. We say 'almost' only because the completely bankrupt governments
that have lost access to market financing have indeed been forced to accept the
odd cosmetic spending reduction. Otherwise, what politicians in Europe like to
call 'austerity' is really a slowdown of the rate at which government
spending increases.
There
is neither theoretical nor empirical proof that the intensity of the bust has
any causal connection to this minor slowdown in government spending growth. It
is simply absurd to make such an assertion. No government produces any wealth
whatsoever. Every single cent governments spend must be taken from the
private sector in one form or another: either by taxation, by borrowing or by
monetary inflation.
There
is no other way to fund government spending. All that governments do is
redistribute existing wealth, in the most inefficient manner possible. It is
akin to pumping water from the deep end of the pool to the shallow end, using a
leaky hose (hat tip to Steve Saville for this trenchant metaphor).
Once
and for all: so-called 'austerity' is not at fault. This is not to say that the
policies that have actually been implemented are not at fault. They most
definitely are, at least in the sense that they have unnecessarily deepened and
lengthened the bust. The fact that the bust was rather intense is as such not
remarkable: it was to be expected to be a mirror image of the preceding boom.
The proper way of dealing with the bust would have been to remove as many
obstacles to the market's adjustment process as possible. This would have
required radical free market reform and the fearless tackling of vested
interests. Neither has occurred.
A
Corrupt and Incompetent Ruling Caste
Politicians
in Europe – and populations coddled by decades of goulash socialism – have come
to view the giant European welfare state with its endless bureaucratic vistas
as a kind of birthright. It isn't, but they have still not understood this.
Moreover, the true cause of the boom-bust cycle – credit expansion by the
banking cartel aided and abetted by the ECB and the euro-system of central
banks – has not received the attention it deserves. In fact, it has not
received any attention at all.
Quite
on the contrary, in order to cover up its incompetence, the political caste
nearly everywhere is crying for more inflation. We recently reported on the ideas
presented by Spain's government in this regard, its attempt to 'challenge German doctrine on the ECB'.
It is
certainly true that the ECB's statutes were written with the Bundesbank's
conservative traditions in mind. However, all the nations that have acceded to
the euro have accepted this from the outset – along, we should add, with the
limits imposed on deficit spending and public debt agreed in the Maastricht
stability pact. No nation wanted to become responsible for the debts of others.
From the point of view of the peripheral countries, there was a very enticing
trade-off, in that they experienced a marked decline in interest rates. This
would not have been possible if the market had not regarded the ECB as more
conservative and independent than the national central banks that previously
issued the currencies of these countries. In other words, now they suddenly
want to have their cake and eat it too.
The
idea that Mrs. Merkel will be in a position to shower them with German taxpayer
funds (what else is expected of her?) after her reelection is misguided, as the
excerpt below underscores:
“Many people are waiting for the elections then hope, expect … a change in the German position. This is not what I would expect," German European Central Bank executive board member Jörg Asmussen told Reuters in an interview this month.
Noting that other countries such as the Netherlands, Finland, Slovakia and Estonia shared Berlin's doubts, he said: "It's easy to hide behind Germany… It's a group of countries, it's not only Germany."
What's more, a good part of Merkel's post-election crisis response will depend on which party she needs to team up with to secure a majority.”
(emphasis added)
We
should add that within this group, there are at least two countries, namely the
Netherlands and Finland, which are on the cusp of suffering major economic
problems as well.
The
problem as we see it is that for one thing, both the political and bureaucratic
classes in many of the crisis countries are irredeemably tainted. Spain's
government has stumbled into a major corruption scandal, one half of Italy's
government practically has one foot planted in jail, in Greece the entire 'old
guard' of politicians as well as the bureaucracies are so reviled for their
corruption that people liken paying taxes to paying protection money to Al
Capone (they are definitely on to something; this is not only true for Greece).
In Portugal and Ireland, the political class may not be quite as tinged by corruption,
but its competence certainly has to be questioned as well (at least Ireland's
politicians successfully defended their low corporate tax rates against the
EU's 'harmonizers', that counts in their favor).
As far
as we are concerned, the competence question extends well beyond the countries
deemed to be in crisis. Politicians in Europe with the sole exception of
those in the Baltics (and there are special reasons for that) don't have
the guts to actually do what needs to be done in terms of reform. Moreover,
their understanding of the wealth creation process and economic laws is in many
cases completely distorted, if it exists at all.
A
recent example is the steadfast refusal of Spain's government to listen to a
rare piece of really good advice from an institution that is central to the
eurocracy, namely the ECB. We are not often siding with central bankers, given
that we think central banks should be abolished as quickly as possible, but we
are making an exception in this case, due to the nature of the advice. The ECB
told Spain's government that it should use the 'breathing room' it currently
has due to the absence of acute financial market crisis conditions to think
about cutting spending and lowering taxes concurrently. That would be an
excellent way of reviving Spain's economy. In fact, were the government to
pursue such a course, its revenues would very likely increase in spite of the
tax cuts, as it is far better to receive a smaller share of a growing pie than
a bigger share of a shrinking pie.
And
yet, Spain's government doesn't want to hear about it – and mind that this is
actually a conservative government, and as such is falsely suspected of being
in possession of a small slice of economic competence or at least a smattering
of common sense.
Another
glaring example is of course the socialist government of president Hollande in
France, which is probably the most business-unfriendly government in all of
Europe. The conceit of life-long bureaucrat-politicians like Hollande is
especially pronounced. He and his colleagues really seem to believe that wealth
is somehow conjured into being by governments – we simply have no better explanation
for why they pursue the policies they have embarked on. It is downright
depressing to watch this bizarre spectacle.
Conclusion:
There
will be no German Santa Claus after the election. There is only one way
forward: radical reform. Accept that the promises of the old-style welfare
state cannot be funded. Deregulate, cut spending, lower taxes. Don't allow
special interests to continue to have their way. Take their privileges away.
Shrink the State. It is as simple as that.
No comments:
Post a Comment