DC Big Bank Takeover
If
there is one truth that became apparent during the financial panic five years
ago, it is that Big Government and Big Finance are inseparable. Of course Uncle
Sam was going to bail out Wall Street, for without the financial infrastructure
that Wall Street provides to maintain orderly markets in various securities, particularly
debt instruments, the multi-trillion dollar operation of our federal government
would cease to function.
I wrote about “The de facto Nationalization
of JPMorgan Chase” in April, 2008, suggesting that when the Federal Reserve helped to
plan and finance JP Morgan Chase’s absorption of many of Bear Stearns’ assets
and operations, it represented “a major turning point in U.S. financial
history.” Subsequent events have corroborated that assessment.
If anyone doubted that Uncle Sam was
moving to take charge of the U.S. financial system, those doubts should have
been dispelled by the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010. Dodd-Frank
conferredunprecedented leverage over
financial institutions through its enforcement arm, the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau. Through its power to designate the institutions of its
choice as “too big to fail” or “systemically important,” and, as I fear we
shall see, to effectively dictate policy to firms so designated, the federal
government is moving to convert gigantic private corporations into
administrative arms of government.
Two recent stories illustrate this point
that the trend is moving toward government dominance of Big Finance. The
insurance giant, Prudential Financial, attempted to resist the feds designating
it a SIFI (the acronym du jour: Systemically Important Financial Institution.)
Not a chance. Washington regulators crushed Prudential’s resistance and
trampled the principle of federalism by usurping the state insurance regulators
that heretofore have overseen Prudential’s operations. According to Richard
Liskov’s account in The Wall
Street Journal, the feds apparently are devising rules on the fly, having assumed
regulatory control over Prudential before the actual regulations have been
drafted.
The other incident showing that Big
Government is subjugating Big Finance is the record $13 billion penalty that
Attorney General Eric Holder has extracted (some would say “extorted”) from
JPMorgan Chase.
A lot of people don’t care about JPMorgan
Chase’s vicissitudes. “They’re just a bunch of corrupt Wall Street fat cats”;
“They can afford it”; “It serves them right”—seem to be the yawning reaction of
a largely apathetic public. If those who are indifferent to this episode were
to understand what’s at stake here, they wouldn’t be so sanguine.
First, there is the question of justice.
The feds strong-armed JPMorgan Chase into absorbing Bear Stearns, and now they
are fining them for things Bear Stearns had done before the
takeover—specifically, peddling low-quality, high-risk mortgage-backed securities.
Never mind the fact that the primary impetus to crank out large volumes of such
shoddy (and eventually “toxic”) securities came from Uncle Sam, particularly
the Department of Housing and Urban Development which pressured Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac to increase the number of risky mortgages that were the main
ingredient of mortgage-backed securities.
Even if you don’t think big financial
corporations deserve justice, you should be concerned about the economic impact
of Uncle Sam’s heavy hand coming down hard on SIFIs. Already, according to Investors
Business Daily, JPMorgan Chase and other megabanks are setting aside billions of dollars
of capital in anticipation of settlements and legal expenses. That means less
capital for entrepreneurs and businesses that could create wealth and provide
jobs.
Besides the capital that the government is
taking from the banks in penalties, the banks are hemorrhaging capital in
another way. Again, Investors Business
Daily reports that, “HUD is forcing banks to eat
$57 billion in bad FHA loans.” It appears that the Federal Housing
Administration is HUD’s current henchman, having supplanted the disgraced
Fannie and Freddie. Again, there goes more capital down the proverbial drain
instead of financing wealth creating enterprises.
The feds are playing a dangerous game by
bleeding the megabanks of capital. According to Richard Parsons in the
Wall Street Journal, 3,000 banks have failed over the last 30 years. The
industry is being consolidated into a progressively shrinking number of
lenders. Due to financial stress (i.e., under-capitalization) 30 of the 50
largest U.S. banks in 1980 no longer survive as independent entities—many
because federal regulators have merged them into larger, better capitalized
banks. If the feds weaken the remaining megabanks by draining capital from
them, they are going to exhaust the supply of financially healthy banks
available to absorb failing banks. Some day, the only alternative remaining to
the Big Government advocates will be to nationalize the banks—to confer de jure
status on the de facto reality that banks are being reduced to servile vassals
carrying out the will of the federal government.
The current trend of bank consolidation is
heading inexorably toward, “Centralization of credit in the hands of the State,
by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive
monopoly”—Marx’s fifth plank in his ten point program for incrementally
achieving socialism. You may not like the big banks, and they surely aren’t
blameless, but if Washington effectively monopolizes the flow of credit in this
country, our economic future will be dismal indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment