Poverty
Professionals And The Crony Capitalists Who Love Them
Yes, it looks like
a wedding announcement out of The Onion, but when it comes to making a killing
off the never-ending “War on Poverty,” the marriage of convenience between the
financial services industry and federal bureaucrats is no laughing matter.
The idea that
government welfare programs could eliminate poverty, rather than temporarily
alleviate its worst impacts during hard times, took root during Lyndon
Johnson’s Great Society initiative. From modest beginnings, a panoply of
federal welfare programs expanded and multiplied to the point where they now
consume one-sixth of the federal budget—some $588 billion last year, according
to the Congressional Budget Office.
This is a lot of
spending—even by contemporary standards—and this figure doesn’t even include
the current explosion in unemployment benefits, as these are considered social
“insurance” payouts rather than welfare. Nor does it include Social Security or
Medicare, our largest and most rapidly growing federal expenditures. To
make matters worse, these programs, which were designed to keep the elderly out
of poverty, are entitlements not yet subject to means testing, so payments go
to rich, middle class, and poor alike.
With anti-poverty
programs enjoying meteoric growth thanks to the economic policies of the
current and previous administrations, we may someday look back fondly on the
days when we “only” had to fork over half a trillion a year to support the
longest and least successful “war” in American history, with no sign of
stopping.
How many civil
servants with good pay and benefits does it take to do all this poverty
fighting? Try as I might to discover the answer I finally gave up,
surprised that I couldn’t locate a definitive study enumerating the number of
federal, state, and government-funded private employees whose livelihood
depends on administering the ever expanding stream of tax dollars flowing to
the poor. Is it any wonder that these entrenched bureaucrats have managed to
slowly expand the definition of poverty to include a standard of living that
would have been considered middle class back when the war on poverty started?
I didn’t do much
better in trying to figure out what fraction of the money appropriated to be
given away is consumed in administrative overhead. For most private
philanthropic organizations, you can easily get that number by looking it up in Charity Navigator, but good luck
uncovering it for most government programs.
What impact does
this have on the economy? If you listen to Keynesian economists, giving away
money is the easiest way to make an economy grow! That’s because when that
money is spent on goods and services it fuels aggregate demand, which pumps up
the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Just like the cleanup from hurricane Sandy,
expanding welfare programs creates economic vitality, never mind that both
hurricanes and welfare drain money from other parts of the economy. So don’t
even think about asking all those people who make a living giving away chunks
of your paycheck to do something productive instead. Keynesians will warn you
that such reckless austerity will drive us into a depression, just like firing
all those government workers did in Greece.
It’s not just
government employees who profit from this growing sector of our distorted
economy. Today’s food related anti-poverty programs, such as food stamps and
foreign food aid, were created during the Great Depression more to help
American farmers than the poor. Today, agricultural interests are still among
the biggest advocates for these programs, but other industries are learning
that they too can make a buck by promoting America’s war on poverty.
It takes big
business to process the distribution of so much “free” money, and that’s where
the financial crony capitalists come in.
Consider the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, otherwise known as food stamps. One
in six Americans now use the Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) cards that
replaced the old printed coupons to purchase everything from groceries to fast
food. Three card processing contractors, J.P. Morgan, Affiliated Computer
Services, and eFunds make money every time they swipe. With $85 billion in
swipes last year, the numbers add up.
Details are hard
to come by as they are not broken out in earnings reports, but a 2012 study
from the Government Accountability Institute “Profits From Poverty” indicates
that since 2004, 18 of the 24 states that contract with J.P. Morgan to provide
welfare benefits have paid over half a billion dollars in fees. That may not
sound like much relative to the size of some of these firms, but it provides a
nice steady income for an industry happy to shower members of the House and
Senate Agricultural Committees with annual campaign donations now exceeding
$300,000 per year.
Yet it doesn’t
seem like the poverty professional have much reason to worry. A
record-shattering 50 million Americans now live below the poverty line, a
number likely to grow as Obamanomics drives more people out of the work force
and onto one assistance program or another. What could be better for the myriad
civil servants and wing-tipped bankers who dole out benefits as ever more
“clients” join the ranks of the poor and unemployed? While the Bible observes
that the poor will always be with us (Matthew 26:11) it sure didn’t count on
the millions more making a living off their misery.
No comments:
Post a Comment