The True Believer

A Saul turning into Paul is neither a rarity nor a miracle

By Eric Hoffer 

PART I: THE APPEAL OF MASS MOVEMENTS

There is in us a tendency to locate the shaping forces of our existence outside ourselves. Success and failure are unavoidably related in our minds with the state of things around us. Hence it is
that people with a sense of fulfillment think it a good world and would like to conserve it as it is, while the frustrated favor radical change.

Those who are awed by their surroundings do not think of change, no matter how miserable their condition. When our mode of life is so precarious as to make it patent that we cannot control the

circumstances of our existence, we tend to stick to the proven and the familiar.

The powerful can be as timid as the weak… Where power is not joined with faith in the future, it is used mainly to ward off the new and preserve the status quo.

Fear of the future causes us to lean against and cling to the present, while faith in the future renders us receptive to change.

For men to plunge headlong into an undertaking of vast change, they must be intently discontented yet not destitute, and they must have the feeling that by the possession of some
potent doctrine, infallible leader or some new technique they have access to a source of irresistible power. They must also have an extravagant conception of the prospects and potentialities of the future. Finally, they must be wholly ignorant of the difficulties involved in their vast undertaking. Experience is a handicap.

PART II: WHO ARE THE POTENTIAL CONVERTS?

The New Poor – It is usually those whose poverty is relatively recent… who throb with the ferment of frustration. The memory of better things is as fire in their veins. They are the disinherited and dispossessed who respond to every rising mass movement.

The Abject Poor… are immune to the appeal of a mass movement… The[ir] goals are concrete and immediate. Every meal is a fulfillment; to go to sleep on a full stomach is a triumph; and every windfall a miracle.

The Free Poor – Freedom aggravates at least as much as it alleviates frustration. Freedom of choice places the whole blame of failure on the shoulders of the individual… Freedom [also]
alleviates frustration by making available the palliatives (things to make it feel better) of action, movement, change, and protest.

It would seem that the most fertile ground for the propagation of the mass movement is a society with considerable freedom but lacking the palliatives for frustration (for example, the freeing of
the serfs).

Almost all our contemporary movements showed in their early stages a hostile attitude toward the family, and did all they could to discredit and disrupt it. They did it by undermining the
authority of parents; by facilitating divorce; by taking over responsibility for feeding, educating, and entertaining the children; and by encouraging illegitimacy. … a disruption of the family,
whatever its causes, fosters automatically a collective spirit and creates a responsiveness to the appeal of mass movements.

A prolonged war by national armies is likely to be followed by a period of social unrest for victors and vanquished alike. …the prolonged break in the civilian routine of the millions
enrolled in the national armies… find it difficult to recapture the rhythm of their prewar lives.

The most incurably frustrated – and, therefore, the most vehement – are those with an unfulfilled craving for creative work (writers, painters, etc.)

The inordinately selfish are particularly susceptible to frustration… It is the inordinately selfish, therefore, who are likely to be the most persuasive champions of selflessness.

PART III: UNITED ACTION AND SELF-SACRIFICE

It is perhaps impossible to understand the nature of mass movements unless it is recognized that their chief preoccupation is to foster, perfect and perpetuate a facility for united action and selfsacrifice.

To ripen a person for self-sacrifice he must be stripped of his individual identity and distinctness.

Dying and killing are easy when they are part of a ritual, ceremonial, dramatic performance, or game… It is only when we see ourselves as actors in a staged performance that death loses its
frightfulness and finality… -

…uniforms, flags, emblems, parades… are designed to separate the soldier from his flesh-andblood self and mask the overwhelming reality of life and death.

Imitation is an essential unifying agent

At its inception a mass movement seems to champion the present against the past.

Not only does a mass movement depict the present as mean and miserable – it deliberately makes it so. It fashions a pattern of individual existence that is dour, hard, repressive, and dull. It
decries pleasures and comforts and extols the rigorous life… To enjoy oneself is to ally with the enemy.

Common suffering by itself, when not joined with hope, does not unite nor does it evoke mutual generosity.

We are less ready to die for what we have or are than for what we wish to have and to be…
People who live full, worth-while lives are not usually ready to die for their own interests nor for their country nor for a holy cause.

He who is free to draw conclusions from his individual experience and observation is not usually hospitable to the idea of martyrdom. For self-sacrifice is an unreasonable act… All active mass
movements strive, therefore, to interpose a fact-proof screen between the faithful and the realities of the world. They do this by claiming that the ultimate and absolute truth is already embodied
in their doctrine and that there is no truth or certitude outside it.

Suspicion too… can act as a unifying agent… When the frustrated congregate in a mass movement, the air is heavy-laden with suspicion. There is prying and spying, tense watching and
tense awareness of being watched. The surprising thing is that this pathological mistrust within the ranks leads not to dissension but strict conformity.”

PART IV. FANATICISM AND HATRED

Fanaticism – estrangement from the self, which is a precondition for… conversion, almost always proceeds in an atmosphere of intense passion. …the stirring of passion [is] an effective
means of upsetting an established equilibrium between man and his self…

Though they seem at opposite poles, fanatics of all kinds are actually crowded together at one end. It is the fanatic and the moderate who are poles apart and never meet. –

Vs. Armies – an army does not come to fulfill the need for a new way of life; it is not a road to salvation… the army is mainly an instrument devised for the preservation of expansion of an
established order – old or new.

Hatred is the most accessible and comprehensive of all unifying agents… Mass movements can rise and spread without belief in a God, but never without belief in a devil.

The ideal devil is a foreigner.

Though hatred is a convenient instrument for mobilizing a community for defense, it does not, in the long run, come cheap. We pay for it by losing all or many of the values we have set out to
defend.

Even when men league themselves mightily together to promote tolerance and peace on earth, they are likely to be violently intolerant toward those not of a like mind.

When we renounce the self and become part of the compact whole, we not only renounce personal advantage but are also rid of personal responsibility… we find a new freedom – freedom to hate, bully, lie, torture, murder

PART V. PROPAGANDA AND PERSUASION

[Propaganda], rather than instill opinion… articulates and justifies opinions already present in the minds of it recipients. The gifted propagandist brings to a boil ideas and passions already
simmering in the minds of its hearers.

Dr. Goebbels: “A sharp sword must always stand behind propaganda if it is to be really effective.”

It is probably as true that violence breeds fanaticism as that fanaticism begets violence. It is often impossible to tell which came first.

The practice of terror serves the true believer not only to cow and crush his opponents but also to invigorate and intensify his own faith.

Force can stop and crush even the most vigorous movement. But to do so the force must be ruthless and persistent.

PART VI. REVOLUTIONARY LEADERS

No matter how vital we think the role of the leadership in the rise of the mass movement, there is no doubt that the leader cannot create the conditions which make a movement possible. – p. 109
[However,] once the stage is set, the presence of an outstanding leader is indispensable. Without him there will be no movement.”

Qualities of the Revolutionary Leader: audacity and a joy in defiance; an iron will; a fanatical conviction that he is in possession of the one and only truth; faith in his destiny and luck; a
capacity for passionate hatred; contempt for the present; a cunning estimate of human nature; a delight in symbols; unbounded brazenness which finds expression in a disregard of consistency and fairness; a recognition that the innermost craving of a following is for communion…; a capacity for winning and holding the utmost loyalty of a group of able lieutenants

Charlatanism of some degree is indispensable for effective leadership… The leader has to be practical and a realist yet must talk the language of the visionary and the idealist.

They do not hesitate to harness man’s hungers and fears to weld a following and make it zealous unto death in service of a holy cause; but unlike a Hitler, a Stalin, or even a Luther and a Calvin, they are not tempted to use the slime of frustrated souls as mortar in the building of a new world… They know that no one can be honorable unless he honors mankind.

PART VII.  DON’T ELECT HALF BLACK EGOTISICAL LYING SACKS OF SHIT WHO NEVER HELD A REAL JOB IN THEIR LIFE BUT WOULD RATHER STEAL SHIT FROM WORKING PEOPLE