No longer is it unusual to hear about
incidents in which police shoot unarmed individuals first and ask questions
later. What is unusual is our lack of outrage, the relative disinterest of our
elected representatives, the media’s abysmal failure to ask questions and
demand answers, and our growing acceptance of the status quo in the United
Police States of America—a status quo in which “we the people” are powerless in
the face of the heavy-handed tactics employed by the government and its armed
agents.
However, as I document in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police
State, it’s all part of the larger police
state continuum. Thus, with each tragic shooting that is shrugged off or
covered up, each piece of legislation passed that criminalizes otherwise legal
activities, every surveillance drone that takes to the skies, every phone call,
email or text that is spied on, and every transaction that is monitored, the
government’s stranglehold over our lives grows stronger.
We have been silent about too many
things for too long, not the least of which is the deadly tendency on the part
of police to resort to lethal force. However, as Martin Luther King Jr.
reminded us, “There comes a time when silence is betrayal.”
For the sake of 13-year-old Andy Lopez,
we can be silent no more. The Santa Rosa teen was shot dead after two sheriff’s
deputies saw him carrying a toy BB gun in public. Lopez was about 20 feet away
from the deputies, his back turned to them, when the officers took cover behind
their car and ordered him to drop the “weapon.” When Lopez turned around, toy
gun in his hand, one of the officers—a 24-year veteran of the force—shot him seven times. The time span
between the deputies calling in a suspicious person sighting and shooting Lopez
was a mere ten seconds.
The young boy died at the scene. Clearly, no attempt was made to use less
lethal force.
Rationalizing the shooting incident, Lt.
Paul Henry of the Santa Rosa Police Department explained, “The deputy’s mindset
was that he was fearful that he was going to be shot.” Yet as William Norman
Grigg, a commentator for LewRockwell.com, points out, such a “preoccupation
with ‘officer safety’ … leads to unnecessary police shootings. A peace officer
is paid to assume certain risks, including those necessary to de-escalate a confrontation
with someone believed to be a heavily armed suspect in a residential
neighborhood.”
Unfortunately, this police preoccupation
with ensuring their own safety at all costs—a mindset that many older law
enforcement officials find abhorrent in light of the more selfless code on
which they were trained—is spreading like a plague among the ranks of police
officers across the country, with tragic consequences for the innocent
civilians unlucky enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Yet the fatality
rate of on-duty patrol officers is reportedly far lower than many other
professions, including construction, logging, fishing, truck driving, and even
trash collection. In fact, police officers have the same rate of dying on the
job as do taxi drivers.
Nevertheless, according to the Bureau of
Justice Statistics, 400 to 500 innocent people are killed by police officers
every year. That does not include the number of unarmed individuals shot and
injured by police simply because they felt threatened or feared for their
safety. This is the danger of having a standing army (which is what police
forces, increasingly made up of individuals with military backgrounds and/or
training, have evolved into) that has been trained to view the citizenry as
little more than potential suspects, combatants and insurgents.
Consider what happened in Cleveland,
when two police officers mistook the sounds of a backfiring car for gunfire and
immediately began pursuing the 1979 Chevrolet Malibu and its two occupants, a
woman driver and a man in the passenger seat. Within 20 minutes, more than 60
police cars, some unmarked, and 115 officers had joined the pursuit, which
ended in a full blown-out firefight in a middle school parking lot that saw 140
bullets fired in less than 30 seconds. Once the smoke cleared, it quickly
became evident that not only had the officers been mistakenly firing at each
other but the “suspects”—dead from countless bullet wounds—were unarmed.
I doubt the police officers involved in
this massacre are bad cops in the sense of being corrupt and on the take, or
violent and abusive, or bloodthirsty and trigger happy. Just like you and me,
these officers have spouses and children to care for, homes to maintain, bills to pay, and worries that keep them up at night. Like most of us,
they strive to do their jobs as best as they know how, but that’s where the
problem arises, because they have clearly been poorly trained in how to
distinguish what is a real threat.
So what is the answer?
If ever there were a time to de-militarize
and de-weaponize local police forces, it’s now. The same goes for scaling back
on the mindset adopted by cops that they are the law and should be
revered, feared and obeyed. As for the idea that citizens must be compliant or
risk being treated like lawbreakers, that’s nothing more than authoritarianism
with a badge.
In other words, it’s time for a reality
check, for both the police and the citizens of this nation, and a good place to
start is with the words of that gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson, who
warned: “Coming of age in a fascist police state will not be a barrel of fun
for anybody, much less for people like me, who are not inclined to suffer Nazis
gladly and feel only contempt for the cowardly flag-suckers who would gladly
give up their outdated freedom to live for the mess of pottage they have been
conned into believing will be freedom from fear.”
No comments:
Post a Comment