Europe must untangle its energy Gordian knot, fast.
Europe, at present the world's largest market and largest economic
bloc, is in decline and living standards are in danger. That was the sober
message at an energy conference here, delivered by a battery of speakers from
across eastern Europe.
The
narrative is that energy is what is dragging Europe down – not low birthrates
and pervasive social-safety networks, but increasing dependence on expensive
energy imports and hopelessly tangled markets.
Although
delegates gathered to discuss the particular problems of eastern Europe, many
had comments about the energy dependence across Europe; its labyrinthine
regulations in nearly all 28 countries, its inability to form capital for large
projects like nuclear, and governments intruding into the market.
The result
is a patchwork of contradictions, counterproductive regulations, political
fiats and multiple objectives that leave Europeans paying more for energy than
they need to and failing to develop indigenous sources, such as their own shale
gas deposits in Ukraine and Poland. It also leaves countries dependent on
capricious and expensive gas from Russia, unsure of whether they can build
needed electric generating plant in the future and poorly interconnected,
sometimes by both gas pipelines and electric lines.
Good
intentions have also had their impact. The European Commission has pushed
renewable energy and subsidized these at the cost of others. The result is
imperfect markets and, more important, imperfectly engineered systems.
Germany
and other countries are dealing with what is called “loop flow” – when the
renewables aren't performing, either because the wind has dropped or the sun
has set, fossil fuels plants have to be activated. This means that renewable
systems are often shadowed by old-fashioned gas and coal generation that has to
be built, but which isn't counted toward the cost of the renewable generation.
With increasing
use of wind, which is the most advanced renewable, the problem of loop flow is
increased, pushing up the price of electricity. Germany is badly affected and
the problem is getting worse because it heavily committed to wind after
abandoning nuclear, following the Fukusima-Daiichi accident in Japan.
Frank
Umbach, associate director of the European Center for Energy and Resource
Security at King's College, London, said energy costs in Germany are now
driving manufacturing out of the country and to the United States.
Umbach
said that as Britain de-industrialized 15 years ago, Germany was beginning to
go the same way. He said Britain had been able to sustain itself through
financial services and other service-sector jobs, but that was not a prospect
for Germany, the industrial mainstay of the European Union. Now Britain, with
its new nuclear policy, is trying to re-industrialize, he said.
Umbach urged that Europe get serious about shale gas and even burning coal. His argument was that there are environment safeguards available and that more are being developed, such as the new less environmentally assaulting techniques in hydraulic fracturing (fracking) used to extract tightly bound natural gas from shale formations.
Umbach urged that Europe get serious about shale gas and even burning coal. His argument was that there are environment safeguards available and that more are being developed, such as the new less environmentally assaulting techniques in hydraulic fracturing (fracking) used to extract tightly bound natural gas from shale formations.
Several
speakers said the region has to face the reality that it is no longer able to
generate the capital it needs for liquified natural gas terminals, nuclear
power plants and unconventional gas recovery in Ukraine, Poland and in the
Black Sea offshore Romania and Bulgaria.
Many
countries, particularly in eastern Europe, still balk at foreign ownership of
their energy infrastructure and have actively driven away investment. Poland,
for example, has frightened off shale gas developers from the United States by
insisting that as the resource is developed, 50 percent of the developing
company must be ceded to the state. The companies left.
In other
places, the Czech Republic, for example, landowners have no claim to the
resource under their land; that remains the property of the government and, therefore,
they are hostile to any development on their property, whether it is for oil,
gas or minerals.
The United
Kingdom, by contrast, declared a spokesman for its energy ministry, Hergen
Haye, is open for business. That means if the Americans, the Chinese or the
Middle Easterners want to “buy into” Britain's new nuclear undertaking, “they
are welcome.”
Europe's
sad energy situation was summed up by Iana Dreyer of the EU Institute for
Security Studies. She said Europe is still the largest trading bloc in the
world, the largest economic machine and the largest market, but that it is
slipping. By 2030, she calculated, Europe will have slipped to No. 3, behind
the China and the United States, unless it can untangle its energy Gordian
knot.
No comments:
Post a Comment