The Destruction of Capital Formation is Still Going Strong
The rock is reality. The squishy place is
the illusion that pervasive racketeering is an okay replacement for an economy. The essence of racketeering is the use of dishonest schemes to get
money, often (but not always) employing coercion to make it work. Some rackets
can function on the sheer cluelessness of the victim(s).
Is it fair to suppose that money
management is at the heart of the sort of advanced, complex economy that
developed early in the 20th century? I think so. Money is the lifeblood of
trade and of investment in productive activities that support trade. Of course,
in order for money to have meaning, to function in such transactional
relations, the people must be convinced that it legitimately represents its
face value. Otherwise, money must be labeled “money” — that is, a medium of
exchange suspected of false value. An economy that uses “money” — especially
an economy of rackets — is an economy in a lot of trouble, and that is where
ours is in December 2013.
The trouble reached escape velocity in the
fall of 2008 when a particular brand of racket among the Wall Street kit-bag of
rackets got badly out-of-hand, namely the business of selling
securitized bundled mortgages and their “innovative” derivative “products” to
dupes unaware that they were booby-trapped for failure which would, perversely, hugely reward
the seller of such trash paper. These were, in the immortal words of Senator
Carl Levin (D-Mich), the “really shitty deal[s]” propagated by the likes of the
Goldman Sachs crypto-bank — so-called collateralized debt obligations — pawned
off on credulous pension fund managers and other “marks” around the world greedy
for “yield.”
It turned out that all the large banks
trafficking in such booby-trapped contracts ended up choking on them when “the
music stopped” — that is, when the derivative “swaps”
payoffs at the heart of this particular racket began to fail, sending up a
general alarm that all such “products” were primed to blow up the entire
“banking” system. By the way, the quotation marks I so liberally resort to are
necessary to denote that in such a matrix of rackets things are not what they
appear to be but only what they pretend to be.
The failure of Bear Stearns followed by
the implosion of Lehman Brothers and the near-death experience of AIG alerted
“civilians” outside Wall Street that the banks were linked in a web of fraud
and insolvency and had to be “rescued” in order for the rest of America to keep
its “way of life” going. The rescue remedy proved to be several new
layers of fraud that have now matured into institutionalized rackets. The best
known are the Siamese twins of “Quantitative Easing” and zero interest rate
policy (ZIRP). The lesser-known racket was the 2009 rule change by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board that allowed banks to make up whatever
numbers they felt like in reporting the value of their holdings (“assets”).
Hence, these dishonest, regularized
operations can be labeled a hostage racket with coercion at their core. The
coercion comes in the form of the threat that any let-up in the stream of QE
“money” enjoyed by the banks in the form of carry-trade “loans” and “primary
dealer” premium cream-offs will send the economy back to the stone age. Overlooked in this equation is the
ongoing destruction of ordinary citizens (a.k.a. the “middle class”) who have
already lost their grip on the emblematic “way of life” Wall Street is working so
tirelessly to defend. Politicians are, of course, deeply implicated and indeed
directly involved in all these rackets, since these hired handmaidens make and
execute the laws protecting Wall Street’s looting operations.
The catch to all this, lately, lies in the
cognitive dissonance between the symptomatic euphoria of record stock market
indexes versus the conviction of a few hardcore skeptical observers that the
rackets are now so reckless and impudent as to be beyond any hope of control
and on a trajectory to bring about hardships orders of magnitude above anything
imagined in 2008.
So-called “health care” is also a hostage
racket, since sick people are hardly in a position to bargain for anything, but
it is only a sub-system of the larger matrix of rackets that have made this
such an unusually dishonest society. My
guess is that ObamaCare is sure to make it worse, and pretty quickly too, since
the rules for ObamaCare were written by the hireling lobbyists of the
industries that benefit from the racketeering.
The big mystery in all this remains: where
are the people with some institutional power who might stand up and denounce
all this perfidy? What
has made us such a culture of cowards and cravens that the best we can do is
produce a couple of comedians who speak truth to power in the form of jokes.
Most of this is not that funny.
By the way, one reason for the vulgar
orgy of “consumerism” that,
in recent years, has turned the Thanksgiving holiday into a sort of grotesque
sporting event, is to mount a crude demonstration that our “money” is a viable
medium of exchange. The dumbest people in the land are induced to swarm through
the merchandise warehouse stores and fight to exchange their “money” for hard
goods offered at false “bargains.” I wonder how much of it is a dress
rehearsal for what happens in a hyper-inflation?
No comments:
Post a Comment