by Tyler Durden
The biggest
market-moving event so far this year is undeniably the positive (so far)
aftershock from Germany's capitulation on monetary expansion and as Michael
Cembalest of JPMorgan goes on to note that the ECB, directly and indirectly, is
giving its governments and its banks the money that the rest of the world has
been taking away. Between the ECB's LTRO largesse and its 'crisis management'
initiatives (for example: collateral standards, watered down Basel III, lower
bank reserve requirements), it seems clear that the resignation of
the German contingency (Stark and Weber) from the ECB last year was a signal of
the laying-down-of-arms by the Germans relative to the Periphery (perhaps for fear of the 'powerful
backlash' that Monti among other has warned about). While the JPMorgan CIO
understands the market's positive reaction (as Armageddon risk is
reduced/delayed) he remains a skeptic broadly given the structural reforms and
any expectations of growth among most euro-
zone economies this year. He reminds investors that it should not be lost on anyone that first prize in the Central Bank balance sheet expansion race is not necessarily one you want to win and we wonder just how aware the German press and public are that this is happening under their watchful (if not frustrated) gaze.
zone economies this year. He reminds investors that it should not be lost on anyone that first prize in the Central Bank balance sheet expansion race is not necessarily one you want to win and we wonder just how aware the German press and public are that this is happening under their watchful (if not frustrated) gaze.
From Michael Cembalest, JPMorgan:
There has been good news in the US
(manufacturing, small business optimism, bank lending to businesses, some
housing indicators), and in China (no hard landing yet, with strength in
production and retail sales offsetting weakness in exports and capital spending).
But the biggest market-moving event so far this year is undeniably the positive
aftershock from Germany’s capitulation on monetary expansion. The mechanism:
the long-term refinancing operations (LTRO) of the ECB, shown in the first
chart. I did not foresee this kind of radical policy being put into place so
aggressively and so quickly. The ECB is printing money, and lending it to just about any European bank against practically any asset it owns, for three years.
aggressively and so quickly. The ECB is printing money, and lending it to just about any European bank against practically any asset it owns, for three years.
This has positive near-term implications
for sovereign and bank financing pressures, the speed of deleveraging, and the
EU recession. On the
first point, as shown below, the front ends of Spanish and Italian yield curves
have collapsed. With demand from national champion banks, and assuming continued
ECB purchases of government debt, 2012 Spanish and Italian financing needs do
not look as onerous as they did 3 months ago. On the second point, there has
been a partial re-opening of core and peripheral bank debt markets. More
importantly, a recent Morgan Stanley report
estimates that some European banks used the LTROs to prefund 50% to 150% of
their 2012 bond maturities assuming markets don’t reopen. And on the
third point, based on this morning’s preliminary manufacturing and service
sector surveys for January, the ECB’s actions may have slowed the severity of
the EU recession as well. The bottom line is that the ECB,
directly and indirectly, is giving its governments and its banks the money that
the rest of the world has been taking away.
Combine the ECB largesse with the
initiatives in Table 1, and you’ve got a region that appears determined to
banish concerns about itself from financial markets this year.
It should not be lost on anyone that first
prize in the Central Bank balance sheet expansion race is not necessarily one
you want to win.After
all, Europe is poised to surpass Japan, whose (admittedly belated) Central Bank
expansion did not prevent bouts of low growth, asset price deflation and
perhaps the world’s least attractive equity market returns over the last 10 and
20 years. Germany was reluctant to go down this road in 2011, a view I thought
would prevail.
However, it’s clearer now that German
resignations from the ECB in 2011 (Stark, Weber) were not, as I saw them, a
reflection of a battle being waged between Germany and the Periphery. They
were instead a reflection of a battle that Germany had already lost; the
resignations were merely signs of the capitulation that followed.
Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti actually went so far last week as to warn
about a “powerful backlash” in the periphery against Germany,
should Germany not do more to lower credit spreads in Italy. A
chi dai il dito si prende il braccio…What kind of action is Monti
demanding here?
Since Germany already surrendered on its
insistence for ECB balance sheet control, perhaps he is referring to fiscal
transfers through joint and severally guaranteed Eurobonds. Will Germany cave
in on this as well? Who knows. I spoke last fall to a former Bundesbank member
and professor of economics at Bonn University who organized the petition of 150
German economists in 1998 arguing for a postponement of the Euro, since
conditions for monetary union were “most unsuitable” for it. He thought the
idea of Eurobonds was absurd, but also thought the same thing about radical ECB
balance sheet expansion.
The positive market reaction is
understandable, given the reduction in Armageddon risk, and how cheap (and
under-owned) European equities had become. The latest steps give Europe more time to try and sort
through all of its structural problems (e.g., why is the level of German
manufacturers reporting labor shortages close to the highest on record while
unemployment in Spain is 23%?). I am still a considerable skeptic on this front, for reasons we have
written about often, and I would be surprised if Italy or Spain grew at all
over the next couple of years. I’m also not sure how many obligations Germany
and France can really take on, given sovereign debt ratios above 80%. And of
course, if the current strategy doesn’t work, the EU will simply have made the
problem bigger for the ECB and EU banks.
Southern Europe needs capital to finance
both budget deficits and trade deficits. Private sector capital is going to need a reason to
come back, and absent a much weaker Euro, downward pressure on wages and prices
may be the only way to do it. For a project designed to reduce regional credit
risk, growth and unemployment differences, the European Economic and Monetary
Union sure has elevated them. As Marx noted in Das Kapital, the road
to hell is paved with good intentions.
No comments:
Post a Comment