The left’s
expectation of a post-Woolwich racist backlash reveals its own anti-working
class prejudices
As soon as it became clear on Wednesday afternoon that soldier Lee Rigby
had been killed in Woolwich by a couple of jihad-spouting losers, you could
almost hear the excited salivation of the nominally left and liberal. They
expected, perhaps even wanted, what they see as Britain’s rising right,
frothing with anti-Muslim sentiment, to respond. And respond they did, as 90 or
so supporters of liberal-left bogeyman, the English Defence League, turned up
at Woolwich for a few lagers, several chants and a scuffle with the police.
It didn’t
matter that the EDL’s evening out in Woolwich was numerically insignificant.
For left-leaning sections of the political and media class, a few blokes in
England football tops and Stone Island jackets was enough to confirm what they
already know: the nation’s working class, especially its white members, are
increasingly consumed by racist, predominantly anti-Muslim sentiment. You see,
the EDL is never grasped as a minority interest group, with fewer supporters
than the majority of football clubs take to away games. It is seen as the
vanguard of the new fascism, the advance warning of the racist storm brewing
among Britain’s white working class.
Over the
weekend, the various tips of Britain’s ‘Islamophobic’ iceberg continued to be
sighted, aided and abetted by the EDL who staged a few demonstrations around
the country, including one outside Downing Street attended by nearly 1,000
supporters. On top of this, various media outlets started carrying headlines
like this one from BBC News: ‘Woolwich murder sparks anti-Muslim backlash.’
They were drawing upon a statement from Faith Matters, a UK campaign group
dedicated to combating ‘extremism and interfaith and intra-faith tension’.
Faith Matters claimed that
since the Woolwich attack, 193 ‘anti-Muslim incidents’ had been reported,
including 10 assaults on mosques.
For the
political and media class, this anecdotally fleshed-out image of a society
potentially in the grip of an anti-Muslim backlash just seems to make sense.
This view passes from speculation to Islamophobic fact with barely a nod to
reality. And no wonder. It is simply assumed that Britain’s white working
class, racked with socioeconomic resentments and grievances, are incredibly
susceptible to the racist, anti-Muslim clarion call of the right. All this
tinderbox requires is a spark. And that came in those images of two black,
self-proclaimed Muslims covered in the blood of an Englishman.
The problem
for excited commentators and activists, eager to do politics like it’s 1939, is
that Britain is not awash with racist, ‘I hate the Muslims’ sentiment. Yes, the
193 post-Woolwich anti-Muslim incidents certainly seem to confirm what many
left-liberal metropolitan types have long suspected of the proles, especially
the provincial ones: namely, that they are just one BNP pamphlet away from
being racist bigots. But when you look a little closer at the figures, it turns
out that over 100 of the incidents were little more than ‘general abuse’ aimed
at Muslims on the internet, and sometimes on the street. A further 47 consisted
of ‘threats of violence’, although how seriously the threats were taken is
unclear. And at the more concerning end, there have been 35 ‘minor’ assaults
‘including eggs being thrown’. So far, no one has actually been harmed.
On closer
inspection, even the 10 ‘assaults’ on mosques look a little overblown. Seven of
the ‘assaults’ consisted of no more than vandalism and a few broken windows,
plus a deposit of bacon outside a mosque in Cardiff. There were three attempts
at arson, but these were thwarted, and, once again, no one was hurt. Nasty
incidents, no doubt, but statistically they are insignificant as indicators of
some rise in anti-Muslim feeling.
The
exaggeration of the reality of so-called Islamophobia should not be a surprise.
Back in 2005, after the 7 July London bombings, countless reports and
commentaries warned of an anti-Muslim backlash. After all, this was only to be
expected given the racist proclivities of many members of the Sun/Daily Mail-reading
classes. Yet when the Crown Prosecution Service published prosecution
statistics for 2005-2006, a different picture emerged. There were 43 cases of
religiously aggravated crime, 18 of them against Muslims (or ‘perceived’
Muslims), and this actually marked a decline from 23 anti-Muslim crimes in
2004-2005 – the year, that is, priorto
the London bombings. As the then Director of Public Prosecutions said at the
time: ‘The fears of a large rise in offences appear to be unfounded.’
Quite. It
seems that while the assertions of rampant Islamophobia tell us very little
about the actual attitudes of certain sections of our society, they tell us a
great deal about how our liberal, leftish elite views the (largely white)
working class. For members of this maligned-then-patronised constituency are no
longer seen as the animating substance of left-wing politics. They are now
grasped as, at best, victims of far-right exploitation and, at worst, as
potential perpetrators of violent bigotry.
No comments:
Post a Comment