Taxpayers
On the Hook for Trillions in Unfunded State Pension Liabilities
A new assessment
of state pension obligations suggests the problem is even worse than it already
appears.
How much worse?
Using a more
conservative method of accounting for financial gains in the marketplace, there
is a $4.1 trillion gap between assets and liabilities — known as the
“unfunded liability” — of all state-level pension systems in the United
States, according to State Budget Solutions, a fiscally conservative think tank
that deals with tax and spending issues at the state level.
On a per-capita basis,
each American would have to fork over about $13,100 to fill that gap and
fulfill the promises made to current and retired state workers.
The new survey
makes the pension crisis look worse than in other reports because of the way
State Budget Solutions calculates the plans’ unfunded liabilities.
The group uses a
measure called “market value liability,” which assumes that pension funds will
earn about 3.22 percent annually — in line with what long-term U.S.
treasury bonds pay. That measure is more accurate than often bloated
assumptions that underpin most state pension plans, Eucalitto said.
“They are able to
make the unfunded liability seem lower and that means they have to put less
money into the pension systems each year,” said Cory Eucalitto, who authored
the State Budget Solutions report.
Many states use an
assumed return of 7 percent or 8 percent, though some are beginning to adjust
those expectations downward. But every time the investments miss that
mark, it widens the gap between the pension fund’s assets and liabilities.
For example, in
Pennsylvania the official unfunded liability reported by the state’s two major
pension systems is a combined $49 billion. That assumes pension funds will grow
at a rate of 7.5 percent every year in perpetuity.
Using the lower,
safer growth rate of 3.22 percent, the unfunded liability in Pennsylvania’s two
pension plans grows to a combined $156 billion.
This different
form of measuring liabilities produces some truly scary results. In five
states, State Budget Solutions calculates pension liabilities represent more
than 40 percent of the entire state economy. In two states — Ohio and
Mississippi — the pension costs are equal to more than half the state’s
gross production.
On a per-capita
basis, it’s equally worrisome. There are five states where the unfunded pension
liability would represent a per-capita cost of more than $20,000, with Alaska
leading the way at more than $32,000 per person.
Even Tennessee, on
the low end of spectrum, would have to ask each and every resident to pay
$5,676 to cover the full cost of its state pension liabilities.
Many states are
struggling to find the political will to deal with the tsunami of pension costs
poised to wreck budgets for decades to come.
In Illinois, where the state is dealing with the
nation’s highest official unfunded liability of $100 billion – State Budget
Solutions says it’s really more like $287 billion – Gov. Pat
Quinn made an effort at reform this year.
The plan landed
with a thud in the state legislature.
A similar effort
by Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett went nowhere during the spring session. He
wanted to move all new state workers into a 401(k)-style pension system, but
lawmakers expressed little interest in the face of sure-fire union opposition.
Conservative
groups and state finance experts point to Wisconsin as an example of where
pension reform is paying dividends. Changes to public employee benefits
that were pushed by Gov. Scott Walker — resulting in massive union-led
protests and an unsuccessful recall effort — have saved the state $110 million this
year, according to one measure.
Kansas and Alaska
have recently reformed their pension systems to include a 401(k)-style plan for
new hires, helping to ease the burden of long-term pension costs.
Eucalitto said
that should be the end goal, because it saves taxpayers’ money and makes the
system more easy for states to manage without the risk of underfunding plans.
It’s also better
for employees, he said, because they have individual accounts and if they are
getting short-changed by the state it will be readily apparent to them.
“For public
employees, they are given greater control over their own retirement and it
makes it harder for states to break their promises to their retirees,”
Eucalitto said.
Using a different
method of accounting for unfunded state pension liabilities, a recent report
from Pew Charitable Trusts estimated the gap between states’ assets and
obligations at around $750 billion.
Add to that an
additional $620 billion in unfunded liabilities for retiree health care
coverage, which many states promise to provide to their retired workers in a
separate system from traditional pensions.
“Though states
have enough cash to cover retiree benefits in the short term, many of them
— even with strong market returns — will not be able to keep up in
the long term without some combination of higher contributions from taxpayers
and employees, deep benefit cuts, and, in some cases, changes in how retirement
plans are structured and benefits are distributed,” concluded researchers at
Pew.
While both Pew and
State Budget Solutions express concerns over higher taxes and cuts to workers’
benefits, states could have other unseen consequences from running up high
levels of pension debt.
Earlier this year,
Moody’s Investors Service, a bond rating agency, warned that high levels of pension debt
could hurt states’ credit ratings and make it more expensive to borrow money
via the bond market.
“Pension
underfunding has been driven by weaker-than-expected investment results,
previous benefit enhancements, and, in some states, failure to pay the annual
required contribution to the pension fund,” said Moody’s analyst Ted
Hampton.
Moody’s is now
assessing states’ pension liabilities and their overall debt levels, he said.
Of the 50 states,
those with the highest debt and pension funding needs include Connecticut,
Hawaii, Massachusetts and Illinois.
No comments:
Post a Comment