Oil-rich
nations are bedeviled by the Resource Curse
BY CHARLES
HUGH SMITH
The global
scramble for Africa's estimated 25 billion barrels of oil is on. Those
scrambling to secure (and/or exploit) the continent's abundance of fossil fuels
include each oil-rich nation's political and economic Elites, international oil
corporations, regional powers, trading blocs and the four major (and energy-hungry)
economic players: the E.U., the U.S., Japan and China.
Oil-rich
nations are bedeviled by the Resource Curse. An
abundance of natural resource wealth distorts the national economy and politics
in a number of ways: private investment in other less exploitable/profitable
sectors of the economy stagnates, leaving the government and economy highly
dependent on resource revenues; local Elites quickly gain control of the income
stream from the resource wealth and divert it to their own accounts and
cronies, institutionalizing corruption, and this diversion of national income
to Elites starves the nation of investment in infrastructure, education,
transportation networks and all the other foundations of a vibrant, competitive
economy.
In
geopolitical terms, oil-rich nations become "areas of interest" to
neighboring states and energy-hungry global powers, further complicating and
distorting national development.
Though many
hope that this flood of energy wealth can be used to fund much-needed
infrastructure, education and public health projects throughout the continent,
the key systems of governance, governmental transparency, an open media and a
political process that enables public participation are problematic in many (if
not all) of Africa's energy-rich nations.
Unfortunately,
these systemic weaknesses render these nations even more vulnerable to the
distortions of the Resource Curse.
No
energy-importing power center can afford to be sidelined in the scramble for
Africa's fossil fuel wealth. Sadly, that insures global
and regional powers will continue jockeying for oil leases (vulnerable to
cancellation when corrupt regimes change hands), development contracts and
political influence within controlling Elites, a process that rewards the least
savory aspects of corrupt regimes.
Global rivals
who have lost out will be tempted to support armed rebellions that weaken their
rival's influence, encouraging conflicts that are inherently destabilizing, not
just to the oil-rich nations but to the region.
Arrayed
against these powerful forces of corruption and destabilization are grassroots
groups supporting democracy and national development and some non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) funded by foundations.
In the
abstract, almost everyone agrees that this energy wealth should benefit all
residents of oil-rich nations. But as
long as it is cheaper in terms of time and money to secure oil by making deals
with kleptocrats and corrupt Elites, there will be few incentives for major
powers to risk losing access to oil/natural gas by supporting policies that
would spread the wealth and encourage democracy.
Sadly, few
consumers of energy care where the energy they burn comes from, or what
distortions were created by the extraction and processing of that energy.
As the Cliff
Robertson character said at the end of the prescient 1975 film, Three
Days of the Condor: "When the people are cold
and their engines stop running, they're not going to ask us why; they'll just
want us to go get it." It's difficult to refute that,
whether the people are American, Chinese or European.
No comments:
Post a Comment