Nelson Mandela’s Battle Against Unionism, and Interventionism
“Workers of the world unite, keep South Africa white.”
–Slogan of early twentieth-century South African Labor Unions
“South Africa’s apartheid is not the corollary of free-market or capitalist forces. Apartheid is the result of anti-capitalistic or socialistic efforts to subvert the operation of market (capitalistic) forces.”
–Walter E. Williams, South Africa’s War Against Capitalism
During the
twentieth century the worldwide socialist movement attempted to criticize
capitalism by associating it with Nazi Germany since the Nazis did not
nationalize many industries as the Russian socialists had done (they allowed
ostensibly private enterprises that were nevertheless regulated, regimented and
controlled by the state). The truth is that the roots of Nazism or
“national socialism” were thoroughly socialistic. The Nazis were “national”
socialists, whereas the Soviets claimed to be international socialists.
The Nazis and the communists were ideological clones who considered the
ideas of classical liberalism (free-market capitalism, limited government, low
taxes, private property, the rule of law, peace), and those who espoused them,
to be their mortal enemy.
Similarly,
the international socialist movement has long attempted to associate another
kind of socialist movement – the former South African Apartheid laws – as some
kind of abuse of capitalism. Nothing could be further from the
truth. Government-imposed discrimination against black South Africans was
instigated by white labor unions associated with various Marxist and communist
movements. It was a pervasive system of government regulation,
regimentation and control. This of course is the exact opposite of
free-market capitalism.
It was
this form of massive government interventionism that the late Nelson Mandela
battled against in his youth, and for which he was imprisoned for twenty-seven
years by the South Africa government. (Unfortunately, Mandela himself
was a socialist and a covert member of the executive committee of theSouth African Communist party who idolized such totalitarian
monsters as Fidel Castro. He apparently never understood that it was a
version of Castroite socialism that had victimized him and the black population
of South Africa, and that what South African blacks needed the most was the
economic freedom and opportunity provided by free-market capitalism).
What Was South African Apartheid?
Two books
are indispensable to understanding the system of government-imposed,
institutionalized discrimination against South African blacks known as
“Apartheid.” They are The Colour Bar by
William H. Hutt, and South Africa’s War Against Capitalism by
Walter E. Williams. Both were published before the final collapse of Apartheid.
The
origins of institutionalized discrimination against South African blacks were
in the violent, Marxist-inspired white labor union movement (which had American
ties) of the early twentieth century. One of the first leaders of this
movement, as Hutt describes, was one W. H. Andrews, who formed a chapter of the
International Socialist League and who became the first secretary of the
Communist Party of South Africa. He championed the use of violence and
terrorism to “protect” white workers from competition from blacks. This
union movement eventually became joined at the hip with the South African
government so as to use the coercive powers of government (which can be far
more violent and terroristic than mere unions alone) to deprive South African
blacks of economic opportunity.
The first
“Colour Bar Act,” as they were known, was the 1911 Mines and Works Act, which
listed numerous jobs that could not legally be performed by blacks. South
African capitalistsopposed this law because they wanted to be
able to hire employees in a free market. In such a market, the generally
lower-skilled and less-educated black workers (less skilled because of inferior
educational opportunities as well as racism) could indeed find employment,
albeit at a lower, entry-level wage than more experienced and skilled white
workers. The unions’ main goal was to deprive “the capitalist class,”
which they harshly condemned, of this opportunity to hire black workers.
As Hutt explained, what the general secretary of the white workers’ labor union
opposed was “the desire of the capitalist class to achieve economies by
bringing better-remunerated and more responsible work within the reach of the
Africans.”
The Mines
and Works Act of 1926 was the result of “the combination of socialism and
racism” brought about by the ruling Nationalist party, a socialist political
party that had formed a coalition government with the South African Labour Party. The lynchpin of this law was known as “the rate for
the job,” a law that mandated minimum wages that precluded thousands of black
workers from offering to become employed at entry-level wages, thereby
depriving them of employment opportunity altogether. This of course is
the effect of minimum-wage laws anywhere and everywhere. As Hutt
wrote, the law “had the effect of preventing the entry of subordinate races or
classes into the protected field.”
A 1922
Apprenticeship Act saw to it that only whites could attain apprenticeships in
numerous trades, with apprenticeship being a prerequisite for employment.
When South African blacks attempted to bypass all these socialistic,
protectionist labor laws by becoming entrepreneurs and starting their own
business enterprises, the union-dominated South African government issued
Obama-style “directives” or executive orders forbidding the opening of any
black-owned businesses, “even in African urban areas.” There was
also a system of “job reservations” where hundreds of jobs were “reserved” for
white workers only.
There were
also pervasive separate-and-unequal laws and regulations affecting just about
every institution in South African society. Inter-racial marriage was
outlawed, as was sexual intercourse between whites and non-whites. These
all of course had nothing whatsoever to do with capitalism or markets or a free
society and were entirely the work of the dark hand of statism. As Walter
Williams concluded in South Africa’s War Against Capitalism,
“The whole ugly history of apartheid has been an attack on free markets and the rights of individuals, and a glorification of centralized government power.”
No comments:
Post a Comment