By Nathan Lewis
Now Europe’s leaders say they want “austerity
with growth.” Sounds nice. They have no clue as to how to achieve it.
Back in 2008, I said that the typical response
of mediocre governments to the economic problems would be a combination of “austerity” and “stimulus.” They
actually use exactly those words. They can’t even manage to make up some new
words, for generation after generation.
I didn’t expect things to follow this blueprint
quite so exactly.
Governments find that they bounce back and
forth between these “austerity” and
“stimulus” strategies, discovering that they are both unsuccessful.
What tends to happen is that “stimulus” means
more government spending. Soon, people discover that this “stimulus” spending
tends to be directed to abject waste and crony capitalists, and the
government’s debt burden explodes. Thus, the political system careens back
toward “austerity.”
“Austerity” usually means less spending and
higher taxes. The higher taxes are implemented, but it is soon discovered that
nobody wants to reduce spending, especially when the economy is crumbling due
to the higher taxes. What small reductions in spending there are tend to be
directed toward genuinely beneficial services, while the waste, graft and crony
capitalist payoffs continue unabated. The sagging economy leads to shortfalls
in tax revenues, and the deficit may even expand.


.jpg)
















.jpg)
.jpg)
_06.jpg)






