A time-honored strategy of cataclysmic discourse, whether performed by preachers or by propagandists, is the retroactive correction. This technique consists of accumulating a staggering amount of horrifying news and then—at the end—tempering it with a slim ray of hope. First you break down all resistance; then you offer an escape route to your stunned audience.
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
The Ideology Of Catastrophe
An instrument of political and philosophical resignation
As an asteroid
hurtles toward Earth, terrified citizens pour into the streets of Brussels to
stare at the mammoth object growing before their eyes. Soon, it will pass
harmlessly by—but first, a strange old man, Professor Philippulus, dressed in a
white sheet and wearing a long beard, appears, beating a gong and crying:
"This is a punishment; repent, for the world is ending!"
As an asteroid
hurtles toward Earth, terrified citizens pour into the streets of Brussels to
stare at the mammoth object growing before their eyes. Soon, it will pass
harmlessly by—but first, a strange old man, Professor Philippulus, dressed in a
white sheet and wearing a long beard, appears, beating a gong and crying:
"This is a punishment; repent, for the world is ending!"
Random Thoughts
Evolution, creationism and government
By Thomas Sowell
How long do politicians have to keep on promising heaven and delivering
hell before people catch on, and stop getting swept away by rhetoric?
Why should being in a professional sport exempt anyone from prosecution
for advocating deliberate violence? Recent revelations of such advocacy of
violence by an NFL coach should lead to his banishment for life by the NFL, and
criminal prosecution by the authorities. If you are serious about reducing
violence, you have to be serious about punishing those who advocate it.
By Thomas Sowell
How long do politicians have to keep on promising heaven and delivering
hell before people catch on, and stop getting swept away by rhetoric?
Why should being in a professional sport exempt anyone from prosecution
for advocating deliberate violence? Recent revelations of such advocacy of
violence by an NFL coach should lead to his banishment for life by the NFL, and
criminal prosecution by the authorities. If you are serious about reducing
violence, you have to be serious about punishing those who advocate it.
The Afghan Syndrome
After Vietnam, there is a new syndrome on the block
Take off your hat. Taps is playing. Almost four decades late, the Vietnam
War and its post-war spawn, the Vietnam Syndrome, are finally heading for their
American grave. It may qualify as the longest attempted burial in history. Last
words — both eulogies and curses — have been offered too many times to mention,
and yet no American administration found the silver bullet that would put that
war away for keeps.
Richard Nixon tried to get rid of it while it was still going on by “Vietnamizing [2]” it. Seven years after it ended, Ronald Reagan tried
to praise it into the dustbin of history, hailing it as “a noble cause [3].” Instead, it morphed from a defeat in the imperium
into a “syndrome,” an unhealthy aversion [4] to war-making believed to afflict the American
people to their core.
By Tom Engelhardt
Take off your hat. Taps is playing. Almost four decades late, the Vietnam
War and its post-war spawn, the Vietnam Syndrome, are finally heading for their
American grave. It may qualify as the longest attempted burial in history. Last
words — both eulogies and curses — have been offered too many times to mention,
and yet no American administration found the silver bullet that would put that
war away for keeps.
Richard Nixon tried to get rid of it while it was still going on by “Vietnamizing [2]” it. Seven years after it ended, Ronald Reagan tried
to praise it into the dustbin of history, hailing it as “a noble cause [3].” Instead, it morphed from a defeat in the imperium
into a “syndrome,” an unhealthy aversion [4] to war-making believed to afflict the American
people to their core.
The good midwife of Sichuan
Private health providers, won’t make a killing
The scene at the
women’s and children’s hospital in Chengdu could be in any well-appointed
modern maternity unit. Doting fathers stare at newborns dozing on crisp bedding
as masked cleaners keep the corridors spotless. The Angel hospital in Sichuan’s
capital is part of a wave of privately owned hospitals, catering to patients
fleeing crowded state clinics.
The patients
here are well-off locals, paying from 20,000 yuan ($3,200) for a Caesarean
delivery and the latest drugs. Rooms cost extra, including suites for families
to host postnatal banquets.
The roots of
private health care in Communist China go back to clinics that treated venereal
disease. In other respects, the taint of private care has gone, and foreign
investment is encouraged. Over 30 joint ventures have been approved; many more
are in the pipeline. The country’s new five-year plan endorses private-sector
investors as part of the solution to the country’s shortage of affordable
health care. Health spending has soared in recent years and is set to top 700
billion yuan by 2015.
By The economist
The scene at the
women’s and children’s hospital in Chengdu could be in any well-appointed
modern maternity unit. Doting fathers stare at newborns dozing on crisp bedding
as masked cleaners keep the corridors spotless. The Angel hospital in Sichuan’s
capital is part of a wave of privately owned hospitals, catering to patients
fleeing crowded state clinics.
The patients
here are well-off locals, paying from 20,000 yuan ($3,200) for a Caesarean
delivery and the latest drugs. Rooms cost extra, including suites for families
to host postnatal banquets.
The roots of
private health care in Communist China go back to clinics that treated venereal
disease. In other respects, the taint of private care has gone, and foreign
investment is encouraged. Over 30 joint ventures have been approved; many more
are in the pipeline. The country’s new five-year plan endorses private-sector
investors as part of the solution to the country’s shortage of affordable
health care. Health spending has soared in recent years and is set to top 700
billion yuan by 2015.
Media Dishonesty and Race Hustlers
Liberal's Risky Investment
When
NBC's "Today" show played the audio of George Zimmerman's call to a
Sanford, Fla., police dispatcher about Trayvon Martin, the editors made him
appear to be a racist who says: "This guy looks like he's up to no good.
He looks black." What Zimmerman actually said was: "This guy looks
like he's up to no good or he's on drugs or something. It's raining, and he's
just walking around, looking about." The 911 officer responded by asking,
"OK, and this guy – is he black, white or Hispanic?" Zimmerman
replied, "He looks black." NBC says it's investigating the doctoring
of the audio, but there's nothing to investigate; its objective was to inflame
passions.
In
his Associated Press article titled "Old photos may be deceptive in Fla.
shooting case," Matt Sedensky pointed out that the photos carried by the
major media were several years old and showed Zimmerman looking fat and mean
and Martin looking like a sweet young kid.
When
NBC's "Today" show played the audio of George Zimmerman's call to a
Sanford, Fla., police dispatcher about Trayvon Martin, the editors made him
appear to be a racist who says: "This guy looks like he's up to no good.
He looks black." What Zimmerman actually said was: "This guy looks
like he's up to no good or he's on drugs or something. It's raining, and he's
just walking around, looking about." The 911 officer responded by asking,
"OK, and this guy – is he black, white or Hispanic?" Zimmerman
replied, "He looks black." NBC says it's investigating the doctoring
of the audio, but there's nothing to investigate; its objective was to inflame
passions.
In
his Associated Press article titled "Old photos may be deceptive in Fla.
shooting case," Matt Sedensky pointed out that the photos carried by the
major media were several years old and showed Zimmerman looking fat and mean
and Martin looking like a sweet young kid.
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
The "Shadow" Government of USA
Leviathan
By Iain Murray
How many
Americans work in government? That’s a difficult question to answer.
Officially, as of 2009, the federal government employed 2.8 million individuals
out of a total U.S. workforce of 236 million — just over 1 percent of the
workforce. But it’s not quite as simple as that. Add in uniformed military
personnel, and the figure goes up to just under 4.4 million. There are also
66,000 people who work in the legislative branch and for federal courts. That
makes the figure around 2 percent of the workforce.
Yet even that
doesn’t tell the full story. A lot of government work is done by contractors or
grantees — from arms manufacturers to local charities, from
environmental-advocacy groups to university researchers. A lot of the work they
do is funded nearly entirely by taxpayers, so they should count as part of the
federal government. Unfortunately, we can’t ask the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) how many government contractors and grantees there are. They
don’t keep such records.
By Iain Murray
How many
Americans work in government? That’s a difficult question to answer.
Officially, as of 2009, the federal government employed 2.8 million individuals
out of a total U.S. workforce of 236 million — just over 1 percent of the
workforce. But it’s not quite as simple as that. Add in uniformed military
personnel, and the figure goes up to just under 4.4 million. There are also
66,000 people who work in the legislative branch and for federal courts. That
makes the figure around 2 percent of the workforce.
Yet even that
doesn’t tell the full story. A lot of government work is done by contractors or
grantees — from arms manufacturers to local charities, from
environmental-advocacy groups to university researchers. A lot of the work they
do is funded nearly entirely by taxpayers, so they should count as part of the
federal government. Unfortunately, we can’t ask the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) how many government contractors and grantees there are. They
don’t keep such records.
You Are No Better Than A Racist
If You Don’t
Believe In Man-Made Global Warming
by James E.
Miller
![]() |
Kari Norgaard claims that she is not plauged by any "aberrant sociological behavior" |
Oregon University
professor Kari Norgaard has made headlines with a controversial paper claiming
that global warming skeptics are plagued by an “aberrant sociological
behavior.” From the Daily Mail:
Sociology and environmental studies professor Kari Norgaard wrote a paper criticising non-believers, suggesting that doubters need to be have a ‘sickness’.
The professor, who holds a B.S. in biology and a master’s and PhD in sociology, argued that ‘cultural resistance’ to accepting humans as being responsible for climate change ‘must be recognised and treated’ as an aberrant sociological behaviour.
Resolving skepticism about climate change alarmists, she added, is a challenge equitable to overcoming ‘racism or slavery in the U.S. South’.
Norgaard added that effective international action on climate change is being hampered by ‘weak’ responses to the crisis by both individuals and societies.
Choosing Prosperity
The Rise and Fall of Indian Socialism
By Sam Staley
By Sam Staley
India became the poster child for
post–World War II socialism in the Third World. Steel, mining, machine tools,
water, telecommunications, insurance, and electrical plants, among other
industries, were effectively nationalized in the mid-1950s as the Indian
government seized the commanding heights of the economy.
Other industries were subjected to such
onerous regulation that innovation came to a near standstill. The Industries
Act of 1951 required all businesses to get a license from the government before
they could launch, expand, or change their products. One of India’s leading
indigenous firms made 119 proposals to the government to start new businesses
or expand existing ones, only to find them rejected by the bureaucracy.
Egypt’s bread revolution
Soaring
food prices could spark another uprising
by Heba Habib
Pouring onto the streets in an unprecedented uprising
last year, Egyptians toppled their dictator of three decades with resonating,
populist chants for “bread, freedom and social justice.”
But while more freedom and social justice
remain a possibility for Egypt, bread might be harder to come by.
Rain in Spain has not left the Plain
Wait a Moment
By Mark Grant
By Mark Grant
It sounds good when said and credible and positive but
the problem is that it is one more absurd illusion. Spain, this morning, says
the next round of budget cuts are going to come from Education and Health
benefits which is all very nice except they do not totally come under the
purview of the Spanish Federal government. The way that Spain is currently
constructed these expenditures are mostly under the control of the regional
governments and so that these kinds of promises by the current administration
in Spain are wisps of cultivated air floating from Madrid to Berlin. Even if
the Federal government could get the cuts accomplished it will take them months
and perhaps months and months so that the headlines of what Spain is going to
do has all of the substance of the milky froth atop some cup of coffee in
Valencia that resembles a cappuccino.
Tale of two small countries
Why is Cayman rich and Belize poor?
By Richard W. Rahn
By Richard W. Rahn
Cayman
is rich, and Belize is poor. Why? Both are small Caribbean countries with the
same climate and roughly the same mixed racial heritage, and both were
English-speaking British colonies. Belize (the former British Honduras)
received its independence in 1981, while Cayman is still not fully independent
but is self-governing at the local level, with its own currency, laws and
regulations.
Belize should be richer: It has a larger population
than Cayman (345,000 as contrasted with Cayman's 54,000). Belize has a much
larger and more varied land area with many more natural resources, including
gas and oil, and some rich agricultural land that Cayman lacks. Both have nice
beaches, but Belize has the second-largest barrier reef in the world after
Australia and also has Mayan ruins. Yet Cayman, with fewer points of interests,
has done more to attract tourists.
Back in the early 1970s, Cayman was as poor on a per
capita basis as is Belize today. Both countries had ambitions to be tourist and
financial centers. Cayman succeeded and has about six times the real per capita
income of Belize. What did Cayman do right and Belize do wrong?
The time bomb no one can defuse
This should be a great time to be a eurosceptic
By Gideon Rachman
The sceptics predicted the single currency would not work. They would love to gloat. Instead, they face a dilemma. For now the sceptics are being told that they must do everything possible to keep the euro together – or risk economic Armageddon.
By Gideon Rachman
The sceptics predicted the single currency would not work. They would love to gloat. Instead, they face a dilemma. For now the sceptics are being told that they must do everything possible to keep the euro together – or risk economic Armageddon.
This conundrum has provoked much head-scratching in Downing Street. Both
David Cameron and George Osborne thought the euro was a bad idea – and neither
man is surprised to see it in trouble. Instinct and intellect lead the British
prime minister and his chancellor to believe that the single currency could
well fall apart. If that is the case, then it would seem futile and
counterproductive to pour money and energy into trying to prop up a doomed
project.
Yet all the briefings Mr Cameron and Mr Osborne are getting from the UK
Treasury suggest that a break-up of the single currency could provoke an economic cataclysm – with banks
and businesses collapsing across Europe, and the risk of another Great
Depression.
Many of the academic and City economists consulted by the prime minister
and his senior colleagues have been just as gloomy as the Treasury. Confronted
with so many assurances that the break-up of the euro spells disaster,
Britain’s leaders have reluctantly gone against their initial instincts. They
are urging European colleagues to do everything they can to keep the single
currency together. In a memorable phrase, Mr Osborne told eurozone leaders to
follow the “remorseless logic” of monetary union and press on towards a true
fiscal union in Europe.
Strangers in a Stranger Land
Filling the Blanks
By Victor Davis Hanson
By Victor Davis Hanson
Trostkyzation
In ancient Rome, when the emperor or an especially
distasteful elite died, his image on stone and in bronze was removed. And by
decree there arose a damnatio memoriae, a holistic effort to erase
away his entire prior existence. When Tiberius got through with the dead
Sejanus, few knew that he had ever existed, such were the powers of the Roman
state to create alternate realities. Orwell’s Animal Farm [1] and 1984 [2] explored
the communist state’s efforts to airbrush away history. Orwell perhaps was most
notably influenced by the removal of Leon Trotsky from the collective Russian
memory to the point that he never existed. That force was used in these
instances does not mean that something like them could not happen [3] through
collective volition; indeed, I think we are starting to see dangerous signs
that a sort of groupthink is already beginning.
Nature and Volatility
Two Kinds of Black Swans
by John Azis
by John Azis
The black swan is probably the most widely
misunderstood philosophical term of this century. I tend to find it being
thrown around to refer to anything surprising and negative. But that’s not how
Taleb defined it.
Taleb defined it very simply as any high
impact surprise event. Of course, the definition of surprise is relative to the
observer. To
the lunatics at the NYT who push bilge about continuing American
primacy, a meteoric decline in America’s standing (probably
emerging from some of the fragilities I have identified in the global economic
fabric) would be a black swan. It would also be a black swan to the sorry
swathes of individuals who believe what they hear in the mainstream media, and
from the lips of politicians (both Romney and Obama have recently paid lip
service to the idea that America is far from decline). Such an event would not
really be a black swan to me; I believe America and her allies will at best be
a solid second in the global pecking order — behind the ASEAN group — by 2025,
simply because ASEAN make a giant swathe of what we consume (and not vice
verse), and producers have a historical tendency to assert authority over
consumers.
The aim of practical politics
Plenty of gloom
Forecasters of scarcity and doom are not only invariably wrong, they think that being wrong proves them right
The Economist
IN 1798 Thomas Robert Malthus inaugurated a grand tradition of environmentalism with his best-selling pamphlet on population. Malthus argued with impeccable logic but distinctly peccable premises that since population tended to increase geometrically (1,2,4,8 ) and food supply to increase arithmetically (1,2,3,4 ), the starvation of Great Britain was inevitable and imminent. Almost everybody thought he was right. He was wrong.
IN 1798 Thomas Robert Malthus inaugurated a grand tradition of environmentalism with his best-selling pamphlet on population. Malthus argued with impeccable logic but distinctly peccable premises that since population tended to increase geometrically (1,2,4,8 ) and food supply to increase arithmetically (1,2,3,4 ), the starvation of Great Britain was inevitable and imminent. Almost everybody thought he was right. He was wrong.
In 1865 an influential book by
Stanley Jevons argued with equally good logic and equally flawed premises that
Britain would run out of coal in a few short years’ time. In 1914, the United
States Bureau of Mines predicted that American oil reserves would last ten
years. In 1939 and again in 1951, the Department of the Interior said American
oil would last 13 years. Wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong.
When Government Safety Nets Break
Feeding the dolphins
by Gary North
The West's governments are going to default, one way
or another. Politicians cannot bring themselves to stop spending money the
governments do not have.
The deficits of the major Western governments are now
so great as to be irreversible. The governments must now borrow money to be
used to pay interest on money already borrowed. In the housing market, this is
called a backward-walking mortgage. It invariably spells default. The subprime
mortgages were mostly of this type.
The West's largest governments are therefore subprime
borrowers.
Monday, April 9, 2012
Carnaval Is Over
The end of the Brazilian miracle
When she strides into the White House on Monday,
Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff will carry with her one thing sure to draw
the envy of her American counterpart Barack Obama -- a whopping 77 percent approval rating. Sitting pretty as a BRIC, at
the top of the world, the darling of international investors, preparing to host
the 2014 World Cup and the 2016 Olympic Games, Brazil is caught up in a
national adrenaline rush comparable -- stereotypically, perhaps -- to what
Carnaval dancers feel when they march amid the cheers into Rio de Janeiro's
Sambadrome.
Roosevelt's vision in deep trouble
The Origins of Entitlement
By Robert Samuelson
By Robert Samuelson
Would Franklin Roosevelt approve of Social Security? The
question seems absurd. After all, Social Security is considered the New Deal's
signature achievement. It distributes nearly $800 billion a year to 56 million
retirees, survivors and disabled beneficiaries. On average, retired workers and
spouses receive $1,839 dollars a month -- money vital to the well-being of
millions. Roosevelt would surely be proud of this, and yet he might also have
reservations. Social Security has evolved into something he never intended and
actively opposed.
It has become what was then called "the dole" and is now known as
"welfare." This forgotten history clarifies why America's budget
problems are so intractable.
A BRIC Wall
The Buck Stops Here
By John Butler
By John Butler
Already on the defensive due to a persistent failure
to achieve its stated policy aims, the US Fed was subject to much fresh
criticism over the past week, including from the BRIC nations, collectively the
largest foreign holders of US dollar reserves. While the dollar remains the
world’s pre-eminent reserve currency, there is growing recognition everywhere,
except inside the Fed itself, that a choice will soon have to be made: Either
the Fed must move to implement a credible, rules-based monetary policy, focused
primarily on preserving the purchasing power of the dollar, or the dollar will
lose reserve currency status, initiating a vicious spiral of dollar and US
Treasury market weakness, which would quickly spill over into the financial
system generally. Were that to happen, the current debate about how to reduce
the US budget deficit would be promptly settled, as it would become impossible
for the US to finance public sector deficits in the first place. Does the Fed,
or the government, see the danger? Regardless, investors need not only to see
it, but to understand it and to act accordingly. Time may be shorter than I
previously thought.
We want war, and we want it now
Reading the
roasted duck
By Pepe Escobar
It was deep into the night, somewhere over Siberia, in a Moscow to Beijing flight (BRIC to BRIC?) when the thought, like a lightning bolt, began to take hold.
What the hell is wrong with those Arabs?
Maybe it was the narcotic effect of that perennially dreadful Terminal F at Sheremetyevo airport - straight out of a Brejnev gulag. Maybe it was the anticipation of finding more about the Russia-China joint naval exercise scheduled for late April.
Or it was simply another case of "you can take the boy out of the Middle East, but you can't take the Middle East out of the boy".
With friends like these ... It all had to do with that Friends of Syria (fools for war?) meeting in Istanbul. Picture Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal - who seems to have a knack for sending US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton into rapture - feverishly arguing that the House of Saud, those paragons of democracy, had "a duty" to weaponize the Syrian "revolutionary" opposition.
And picture al-Faisal ordering an immediate ceasefire by the Bashar al-Assad government, guilty - according to the House of Saud - not only of cruel repression but crimes against humanity.
No; this was not a Monty Python sketch.
It was deep into the night, somewhere over Siberia, in a Moscow to Beijing flight (BRIC to BRIC?) when the thought, like a lightning bolt, began to take hold.
What the hell is wrong with those Arabs?
Maybe it was the narcotic effect of that perennially dreadful Terminal F at Sheremetyevo airport - straight out of a Brejnev gulag. Maybe it was the anticipation of finding more about the Russia-China joint naval exercise scheduled for late April.
Or it was simply another case of "you can take the boy out of the Middle East, but you can't take the Middle East out of the boy".
With friends like these ... It all had to do with that Friends of Syria (fools for war?) meeting in Istanbul. Picture Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal - who seems to have a knack for sending US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton into rapture - feverishly arguing that the House of Saud, those paragons of democracy, had "a duty" to weaponize the Syrian "revolutionary" opposition.
And picture al-Faisal ordering an immediate ceasefire by the Bashar al-Assad government, guilty - according to the House of Saud - not only of cruel repression but crimes against humanity.
No; this was not a Monty Python sketch.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)