by James E. Miller
In a recent BBC News article, philosopher
John Gray asks the quaint but otherwise vain question of what would John
Maynard Keynes do in today’s economic slump.
I call the question vain because practically every Western government
has followed Keynes’ prescribed remedy for the so-called Great Recession. Following the financial crisis of 2008,
governments around the world engaged in deficit spending while central banks
pushed interest rates to unprecedented lows.
Nearly four years later, unemployment remains stubbornly high in most
major countries.
Even now in the face of the come-down that
inevitably follows any stimulus-induced feelings of euphoria, certain central
banks have taken to further monetary easing.
The Bank of England recently announced an extension of its quantitative
easing program by £50bn. Not to be
outdone, both the People’s Bank of China and the European Central Bank cut
interest rates in an effort to boost consumer borrowing. Still, these new rounds of monetary stimulus
don’t appear to be doing the trick. The
Keynesian miracle cure has been a spectacular dud thus far. All that modern day disciples of Keynes can
do is scratch their heads and say “more should have been done.” They never allude to how many more trillions
of paper dollars should have been created or spent; just call it the excuse
that keeps on giving.