Is the Arab Middle East ready for democracy? We know how the past two American presidents have answered this.
by Andrew P. Napolitano
The revised stated purpose behind President George W. Bush’s invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq was to build a new world order by forcing democracy on populations to whom it was truly alien. The original stated purpose for invading Afghanistan was to destroy the folks who provided shelter to the 9/11 attackers, and the original stated purpose for invading Iraq was to rid it of a government that possessed and might use weapons of mass destruction.
The revised stated purpose behind President George W. Bush’s invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq was to build a new world order by forcing democracy on populations to whom it was truly alien. The original stated purpose for invading Afghanistan was to destroy the folks who provided shelter to the 9/11 attackers, and the original stated purpose for invading Iraq was to rid it of a government that possessed and might use weapons of mass destruction.
But when we
learned that the real support for the 9/11 attacks came from folks protected by
our so-called friends in Saudi Arabia, and when we learned that the only
weapons of mass destruction possessed by Iraq were the ones the U.S. sold to
Saddam Hussein in the mid-1980s, which he no longer possessed, the Bush
administration changed the rhetoric but not the violence or its cost.
Since the
termination of those wars came about after the installation of puppet regimes
in both countries, and since those regimes now claim legitimacy because they
were elected by the people permitted to vote there, we have been reminded that
democracy is more than the result of a majority vote. It is respect for the
rule of law and recognition of the inalienable rights of the individual. It is
not torture, extra-judicial killings, or government-sanctioned rape and legal
suppression of women and girls; it is not racial and religious and ethnic
hatred and persecution; and it is not the rule of mobs in the streets.
When Egypt was in
turmoil a year ago, President Obama nudged Hosni Mubarak from office. He was
the longtime American puppet and Egyptian strongman who called himself
president but was never really elected. His downfall was followed by a
short-lived military dictatorship, and that was followed by the popular
election of Islamic radicals to the government. They hate the West, the U.S. and Israel.
Is it any wonder
that our embassy in Cairo has been attacked and our folks who work and live
there are threatened every day? Should the president alone be able to help
depose a foreign leader without the consensus of the American people or their
elected representatives in Congress? Did the president’s miscalculations take
into account that it might be better to leave in place the devil you know
instead of inviting the devil you don’t know to replace him? Did he consider
that the leader of Egypt is for the Egyptians – and not the American government
– to decide?
The case of Libya
is even worse. There, Obama unlawfully, deceptively and unconstitutionally
bombed Libya in an effort either to kill Col. Gadhafi, its former strongman and
American ally, or to weaken his defenses until he surrendered. It was unlawful
because he used the CIA to fight a war. It was deceptive because he lied about
no boots on the ground ("boots" referring to troops, rather than
intelligence agents with military hardware). It was unconstitutional because
under the Constitution, only Congress may declare war on another country. This
was an act of war on a legitimate government, one that then-President George W.
Bush and then-British Prime Minister Tony Blair praised a few years earlier as
a partner in the war against terror, and one that posed no threat whatsoever to
American freedom.
Now we know that
some of the very same people the U.S. fought – and supposedly defeated in
Afghanistan and Iraq – were part of the coalition of violent militias that
ousted Gadhafi with the help of American bombs. And the government they wrought
is too weak to protect our diplomats and our real estate there from them. And
so they attacked our unguarded consulate in Benghazi and killed our ambassador,
and so far they have gotten away with it.
Does anyone really
believe the nonsense from the Obama administration that the recent killings of
Americans and others and the destruction in the Arab world are about a
15-minute grade-C movie trailer with dubbed voices and terrible acting and no
plot or message? Or is the violence about the opportunity of those Bush and
Obama trusted to run new governments to vent their hatred?
Is it not more
likely that when the West supported toppling Arab strongmen, the rioters in the
streets saw that as a signal to express hatred toward the meddling West? Might
Obama’s drones, which have fallen all over the Middle East killing innocents in
schools and hospitals, at weddings and funerals, and demolishing mosques and
homes, be coming back to haunt him?
The Arab Spring
has become the Western Winter, brought about by two American presidents who
thought they could kill without moral justification or painful consequence. We
should come home from these barbaric places and leave them alone. We should
trade with them, since they want to buy our iPads and washing machines and blue
jeans, but let them run their own governments.
No comments:
Post a Comment