by DETLEV
SCHLICHTER
I thought I
should address a couple of points that I consider to be misconceptions and that
frequently come up in discussions with the audience or other speakers when I
present my views on the fundamental problems with fiat money. I am not always
in a position to correct these misconceptions right then. They are often woven
into questions on other points and I have to leave them uncommented as not to
disrupt the flow of the debate. My book is, I believe, quite clear on these
points, so I could simply refer people to Paper Money Collapse. But,
for whatever reason, it is still the case that many in my audience make
inferences from similar arguments to my arguments, and I fear that some of the
differences between these positions might get overlooked. These differences are
not unimportant, and I think it is worthwhile to highlight and clarify them.
The first point
is related to the question what gives money its value? The second point is, is
fractional-reserve banking fraudulent and should it be banned on the basis of
property rights?